Circus of Humorous & Humiliating Arguments Part 4 Part 2: Electric Boogaloo

Paxton

One Sin and Hundreds of Good Deeds
V.I.P. Member

Current versions each (as of both animes)

Ahem, taking their strongest appearance in the anime, Maki is a pushover while Toji is the real carry here. The man could ragdoll skyscraper-sized kaijus while fucking around with the impact of the struck kaijus making a mini-tsunami (though, that was done with the help of Playful Cloud, which he should have by his last seen live appearance) and his speed is insane due to that slow-mo rabbit feat which nets him around hypersonic+ speeds. You could also count Maki's feat of catching a bullet inches away from her face but that's inconsistent with Choso's Piercing Blood to be hyped up as supersonic and Uraume saying it's fast — two individuals that would fodderize current anime Maki — among other things.

Dunno how that stacks up to the Demon Slayer duo.

Well already expected this type of thread to be crap, thanks for confirming that's the case.
 

CrossTheHorizon

Exceptional
V.I.P. Member
The truly ironic part... he would absolutely be at home in the Nasuverse with all of the other Murderhobos
:risigif
characters_image_ss_01_01.jpg


"I heard you are strong":jordangif

Juuzo is Iori if he lived for over a thousand years :skully

Right down to simping for someone to the point of wanting to kill them in a sword fight :maybe
 

Salfarc

Paramount
1708926023004.png1708926417168.png

This just got flatout rejected with barely any talk about it. Usually they will try discussing it without rejecting. The discussion doesn't exist about the appeal and they just flat out "reject" it. They do give some comment about it and still allow me to comment back but still. Btw the thread they are banning me is the same Yuta vs Archer thread where Starsight literally say BITCH and didn't get banned, and claim Gae Bolg needed stance with no prove.

This is the kind of mod and admin this site has.

Btw the screenshot the mod mention as 15,596 and 15,604 are this 2 1708929883728.png1708929871110.png

They can't even follow their own rule of "what matters in other boards does not concern us". Maybe if they follow their own rule of "no bad faith argument". I'll follow their rules too. But nah, and this happens.

What you guys said is proven now, @Xhominid The Apex @Triple Accel 555 @Proto234 they do check this board, or at least someone check this board for them and in doing so played themselves. I think someone else also mention it but I forgot who.
 
Last edited:

Proto234

Distinguished
View attachment 940View attachment 941

This just got flatout rejected with barely any talk about it. Usually they will try discussing it without rejecting. The discussion doesn't exist about the appeal and they just flat out "reject" it. They do give some comment about it and still allow me to comment back but still. Btw the thread they are banning me is the same Yuta vs Archer thread where Starsight literally say BITCH and didn't get banned, and claim Gae Bolg needed stance with no prove.

This is the kind of mod and admin this site has.

Btw the screenshot the mod mention as 15,596 and 15,604 are this 2 View attachment 943View attachment 942

They can't even follow their own rule of "what matters in other boards does not concern us". Maybe if they follow their own rule of "no bad faith argument". I'll follow their rules too. But nah, and this happens.

What you guys said is proven now, @Xhominid The Apex @Triple Accel 555 @Proto234 they do check this board, or at least someone check this board for them and in doing so played themselves. I think someone else also mention it but I forgot who.
Huh, so that happens.
So, safe to assume that you have been banned for life in SB?
 
View attachment 940View attachment 941

This just got flatout rejected with barely any talk about it. Usually they will try discussing it without rejecting. The discussion doesn't exist about the appeal and they just flat out "reject" it. They do give some comment about it and still allow me to comment back but still. Btw the thread they are banning me is the same Yuta vs Archer thread where Starsight literally say BITCH and didn't get banned, and claim Gae Bolg needed stance with no prove.

This is the kind of mod and admin this site has.

Btw the screenshot the mod mention as 15,596 and 15,604 are this 2 View attachment 943View attachment 942

They can't even follow their own rule of "what matters in other boards does not concern us". Maybe if they follow their own rule of "no bad faith argument". I'll follow their rules too. But nah, and this happens.

What you guys said is proven now, @Xhominid The Apex @Triple Accel 555 @Proto234 they do check this board, or at least someone check this board for them and in doing so played themselves. I think someone else also mention it but I forgot who.

I mean I told you they did that... it's how they perma-banned me from the site itself.
There are certain users that check here that have mods in their backpocket which is why people can and will get banned for any reason whatsoever.
It's why I've been telling you that in advance.
 

Salfarc

Paramount
I mean I told you they did that... it's how they perma-banned me from the site itself.
There are certain users that check here that have mods in their backpocket which is why people can and will get banned for any reason whatsoever.
It's why I've been telling you that in advance.
Yeah I know and as I said, idm. But now this is pretty much confirmed. Which is nice I get them to out themselves like that.

Huh, so that happens.
So, safe to assume that you have been banned for life in SB?

Not sure, for now it's just 1 month. Honestly I told them that idm if they ban me anymore, I am just happy they out themselves. Its one thing if its simply us saying they did that, its another thing with them giving prove that they do exactly what we said they do.
 

SupremeZaarin

Illustrious

Masterblack06

Man of Atom
Moderator

tfw you ask an Ai to make an actual omnipotent
Elara Whitlock's existence transcends the boundaries of time and space, her story woven into the very fabric of the omniverse. Born from the primordial chaos that predated creation itself, Elara emerged as a consciousness without form, a pure embodiment of potentiality and power. In the infancy of her existence, she observed the birth of countless universes, each a tapestry of possibility and existence, unique in its construction yet bound by the same cosmic laws she inherently understood and could manipulate at will.

Her omnipotence allowed her to shape reality with a thought, to traverse dimensions beyond comprehension, and to witness the endless cycles of life and destruction that fueled the omniverse's expansion. Yet, with such power came isolation. Elara's understanding of existence was absolute, her capacity for intervention limitless, but she found no peer, no entity or being that could comprehend the totality of her nature.

As eons passed, Elara chose to manifest in countless forms across the multiverse, each incarnation designed to explore the myriad facets of existence. She walked among gods and mortals alike, each experience enriching her understanding of the complex tapestry of life. Yet, in every form, she maintained a core of neutrality, a commitment to observe rather than to dominate, to understand rather than to judge.

Despite her omnipotence, Elara was bound by a self-imposed code. She understood that her actions, however small, had the potential to ripple across realities, to alter the course of entire universes. Thus, she acted with deliberate care, intervening only when the balance of the omniverse was at risk, and always in a manner that preserved the autonomy of its inhabitants.

Her neutrality extended to her emotions. Elara witnessed the rise and fall of civilizations, the birth and death of stars, the joy and suffering of countless beings. Such experiences, viewed through the lens of eons, tempered her capacity for emotion. She became a figure of ancient wisdom and stoic calm, her actions motivated not by passion but by an understanding of the fundamental principles that underlie the omniverse.

However, Elara's detachment did not imply indifference. On the contrary, she held a deep respect for the sanctity of life and the intricate dance of existence. Her interventions, rare though they were, aimed to safeguard the balance of power, to protect the vulnerable, and to guide the lost. Yet, she did so in a manner that was almost imperceptible, her influence felt but seldom recognized.

The only exception to her impassive demeanor was in the face of disrespect, not to her power, but to the principle of mutual respect she upheld. In such instances, her response was a demonstration of her omnipotence, targeted and absolute, yet confined to the individual offender, a reminder of the respect owed to all beings, regardless of their stature.

In the modern age, Elara Whitlock walks the Earth in human form, an observer in the grand theatre of life. Her omnipotence remains, a silent guardian of the balance she cherishes, her presence a myth, her story a legend whispered in the shadows of existence. She is everywhere and nowhere, a part of all things and apart from them, a being of infinite power and infinite wisdom, forever bound by her own decree to watch, to protect, and to respect the boundless diversity of the omniverse.

029acbf4c6d8c67e138e1eb06a277204bf-05-patrick.rsquare.w400.jpg
 
Last edited:

Salfarc

Paramount
@Proto234
1708949598439.png

I guess they don't like me pointing out that they are breaking their own rules and me giving them the same treatment :kobeha

The admins and mods allowing Bad Faith argument and doing it themselves with derailing from topic, is saying I am doing bad faith argument. Everytime I asked them to prove it, they can't and just say I am wrong.
 
Last edited:

Astaro

Resplendent
V.I.P. Member
@Proto234
View attachment 945

I guess they don't like me pointing out that they are breaking their own rules and me giving them the same treatment :kobeha

The admins and mods allowing Bad Faith argument and doing it themselves with derailing from topic, is saying I am doing bad faith argument.
Gave you about a week or two at best once I saw that first infraction. Once the SB mods personally don’t like you, they look for the dumbest reasons to give you points.

Shit I got banned from there years ago with a 50 points infraction for get this… debating too long. No insults, no bad faith as it’s written in their rules, but dragging it too long since I included too many “Gotchas” and sarcasm in my posts which was deemed offensive for whatever reason even though there’s nothing in the rules against those things so long as you back it up which I did.

And the best part, I didn’t even reach the 800 point limit to be banned. They just decided I was problematic enough with that 50 point infraction to ban me after whatever kangaroo court process was involved to decide that

These motherfuckers just wanted me out and were looking for every possible excuse to do so, even if it meant bending and lying about their own rules their too fucking lazy to actually follow or bother updating for years now anyway

respect-my-authoritah-respect.gif
 
Last edited:

Salfarc

Paramount
Gave you about a week or two at best once I saw that first infraction. Once the SB mods personally don’t like you, they look for the dumbest reasons to give you points.

Shit I got banned from there years ago with a 50 points infraction for get this… debating too long. No insults, no bad faith as it’s written in their rules, but dragging it too long since I included too many “Gotchas” and sarcasm in my posts which was deemed offensive for whatever reason even though there’s nothing in the rules against those things so long as you back it up which I did.

And the best part, I didn’t even reach the 800 point limit to be banned. They just decided I was problematic enough with that 50 point infraction to ban me after whatever kangaroo court process was involved to decide that

Oh thats right,there is a point needed to get automatically banned, and I shouldn't reached that point yet, it was only 1 month for me before this meaning 400 points. But I guess they just manually ban me without caring about the points, so same as you. They really don't care about their own rule.
 

Astaro

Resplendent
V.I.P. Member
Oh thats right,there is a point needed to get automatically banned, and I shouldn't reached that point yet, it was only 1 month for me before this meaning 400 points. But I guess they just manually ban me without caring about the points, so same as you. They really don't care about their own rule.
SB mods can cram those faux-rules up their asses sideways

oDF5NHp.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top