What I effectively did was ask if anyone had leads, then looked into it some, and found nothing consequential. what I'm assuming now is that we're still working on that.
There are several pages arguing about TAT being lynched and I have no idea what that accomplished. T-pein told me to go look back at those in specific when i asked if someone could explain what's been happening, and that’s what I got from it. I'm going to have to go back further and really look into things for myself when I get the chance to.
It does seem kinda convenient, huh Not convenient as someone actually telling me what I missed, though. Looking back a bit, it looks like there was a lot of discussion about a guy who is currently dead and not participating. It was a good opportunity for everyone involved to make themselves look scummy, but in a way that doesn't really give me anything substantial to work with. Idk, can someone make sense of this for me?
Apologies for the inactivity yesterday, the day phase came at a less than ideal time... If anyone can give me a quick rundown on what's what and who I should be concerned about it would be much appreciated. I have to go haul ass and hope that the Austin traffic gods do me a solid, but I'll be back in an hour or so.
Reading through the past 10-20 pages, my concerns with Prof haven't changed Idk about TAT being scum, but considering how and why I've been inactive, I'm much more willing to believe that they're just busy. Could be scum for other reasons though, i haven't looked too far into their posts yet.
I don't completely understand what this bit is Prof's doing. Like I get it's meant to be a sort of "reverse psychology" and by acting suspicious in a very blatant way, we're meant to assume he's town. It just makes him look untrustworthy, and I don't really see how that benefits him.
Fine in the sense that it's not enough information to figure out your role, because there are several with the same ultimate? That's the charitable way to interpret it. I guess it could also be fine if it's a misdirection, though, since it's technically not giving away what your role is.
As someone who also hadn't said anything at that point, i'm curious to know why you'd go for prof specifically. I figure your more familiar with him, and maybe he's the type to do the intentionally inactive strat... but you know what they say about assumptions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.