But the character in question saying it is a reputable source
There's more reason to believe he's right (being one of the most knowledgeable characters on magic in the series, and being an immortal who wants to die) when he says it can't kill him over the idea that he's wrong and it can kill him.
like damn this isn't some random saying this
it's practically the author's mouth piece
Touma isn't a reputable source for what he says about his own physical capability, because it's contradicted by his own showings and he's blatantly delusional in that regard.
Zeref is a reputable source on magic in Fairy Tail though.
They're not the same.
"scp 3396 is stupidly fast for index standards like even Othinus’ light speed feat doesn’t even come close to how fast 3396 considering this thing can fire projectiles at the same speed."
vsb says it's MFTL through scaling to cosmic entities that flew across space in an unspecified amount of time
Kind wild this is even being argued by 3 people here yeah.I didn't think due to FT would start an argument about the NLF. Although you could argue about friendship and love.
As long as there is nothing contradicting the statement or implying the statement is wrong, and as long as the statement come from reliable source within the story: We assume the statement is true.
But the character in question saying it is a reputable source
There's more reason to believe he's right (being one of the most knowledgeable characters on magic in the series, and being an immortal who wants to die) when he says it can't kill him over the idea that he's wrong and it can kill him.
like damn this isn't some random saying this
it's practically the author's mouth piece
In the context of resisting Hit's time stop, yeah?
Stronger than Time Jiren confirmed then
The statement is all that matters Pax, the feat isnt neededIn the context of resisting Hit's time stop, yeah?
That's what Vados meant.
You are misrepresenting argument as if I said every statements are immediately and always true, this behaviour of misrepresenting is no different than Spacebattle. If Zeno is stated to be capable of rewriting reality and nothing contradicts it even if it isn't shown that means he can. Jiren shows his power and I think it isn't transcending time, therefore I think thats a contradiction. Is he strong enough to beat Hit's time stop? Yes, is he strong enough to break time? No.
Stronger than Time Jiren confirmed then
As long as there is nothing contradicting the statement or implying the statement is wrong, and as long as the statement come from reliable source within the story: We assume the statement is true.
Your problem is that your taking me poking jabs at the argument of "If the statement is from a reliable source then we dont need feats" as a serious thing.You are misrepresenting argument as if I said every statements are immediately and always true, this behaviour of misrepresenting is no different than Spacebattle. If Zeno is stated to be capable of rewriting reality and nothing contradicts it even if it isn't shown that means he can. Jiren shows his power and I think it isn't transcending time, therefore I think thats a contradiction. Is he strong enough to beat Hit's time stop? Yes, is he strong enough to break time? No.
This is like saying "Chaos cannot destroy the world as it got stopped by Musashi and therefore just statement and not feat". Bruh.
That is not how it works in Spacebattles. Spacebattles are the one that doesn't believe statement at all, hence why one of their downplay technique is that. Imaginary Idjit's favourite technique is this. In fact I remember talking about this in SB because they believe statement are wrong unless there is feat. I don't remember what thread was that but it happens in SB. Believe thing will also means believing Chaos can't destroy world because there is no feats shown he can do that as Musashi stopped it.That is literally not how it works here, that's how it works in Spacebattles, what the fuck is happening here?!
My brother in christ they had a whole year where they tried to give Ainz blanket immunity to fire because he had a statement saying he was immune to fire.That is not how it works in Spacebattles. Spacebattles are the one that doesn't believe statement at all
Your example with Chaos is also ass as well. My entire annoying with Memento Mori is being going "Well its said to erase people from existence but it wouldnt work on Zeref" with no fucking backing to make that claim other than. "Zeref wanted to die" and "Zeref killed him." That less than worthless. If Excaliblast was stated to be able to one shot Herc through all 9 of his lives and then Saber got killed before she even got the chance to try. I would say "Guess we wont know" and leave it at that I wouldnt just give her the feat and call it a day.
That is not how it works in Spacebattles. Spacebattles are the one that doesn't believe statement at all, hence why one of their downplay technique is that. Imaginary Idjit's favourite technique is this. In fact I remember talking about this in SB because they believe statement are wrong unless there is feat. I don't remember what thread was that but it happens in SB. Believe thing will also means believing Chaos can't destroy world because there is no feats shown he can do that as Musashi stopped it.
Some people in Spacebattle do, some people don't like you guys here. Either way this is your argument with Paxton, I'll leave you guys to it.
Oh, that Mr. Bean gif. I remember that episode from when I was a kid, and the context around him doing it. Funny as fuck. Rowan Atkinson is an absolute legend.Nah
going by your logic, as long as the character in question says it wont or will then thats all that matters. Feats or lack of feats be damned
the simpliest explanation is all that matters in your eyes.
So were just gonna run with that for everything now.
Something I chose to gloss over by bringing up Mr. Bean. That's what.WTF happened here?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?