So the mere existence of nudity in the manga warrants a full ban on it ever being discussed in ANY sense?
Friendly reminder threads discussing **** films Cuties was totally fine for the SB modsFOR FUCKS SAKE THEY DIDNT LOCK A THREAD INVOLVING MONSTER GIRL QUEST
BRO GET THIS NIGGA OUTTA HERE
AbsolutelyThe fact that Asagi Igawa from the hit series Taimanin Asagi got all of her orifices stuffed with demonic dicks shouldn't detract from the fact that she could legitimately stomp a good chunks of shounen titles through sheer speed alone.
And as long as i don't post said stuffing scene, i should be allowed to argue in a thread how Asagi speedblitz Muzan from KnY.
I got a warning for posting an Edens Zero scan without any nudity because Rebecca was being 'sexualized' in it.
I feel like this is kind of moderation is dumb and unwarranted. The points actively being argued in the thread had nothing to do with and completely dissonant from the NSFW aspect of the work in question.
Even their in-site ruling for shits like that is concerned more about actually posting and/or directly linking to NSFW contents within the forum board. Not a direct forbiddance of a body of work that just so happen to have NSFW aspect to it.
Haven't seen all the linked scans in the thread itself, but i can only see the thread locked being justified if someone actually deadass posted the gratuitous fanservice-y parts of the manga. And so far i didn't see it.
Someone needs to start checking the mods hard drivesFriendly reminder threads discussing **** films Cuties was totally fine for the SB mods
The fact that Asagi Igawa from the hit series Taimanin Asagi got all of her orifices stuffed with demonic dicks shouldn't detract from the fact that she could legitimately stomp a good chunks of shounen titles through sheer speed alone.
And as long as i don't post said stuffing scene, i should be allowed to argue in a thread how Asagi speedblitz Muzan from KnY.
I feel like this is kind of moderation is dumb and unwarranted. The points actively being argued in the thread had nothing to do with and completely dissonant from the NSFW aspect of the work in question.
Even their in-site ruling for shits like that is concerned more about actually posting and/or directly linking to NSFW contents within the forum board. Not a direct forbiddance of a body of work that just so happen to have NSFW aspect to it.
Haven't seen all the linked scans in the thread itself, but i can only see the thread locked being justified if someone actually deadass posted the gratuitous fanservice-y parts of the manga. And so far i didn't see it.
Absolutely
As long as there are actual feats and it's not all just gags, any work of fiction should be on the table.
I cross the line on fanfiction and anything unofficial / unpublished
I know Suggsverse, more specifically Heir to the Stars, is a published workTechnically it's published... he went that far just to win debates.
I know Suggsverse, more specifically Heir to the Stars, is a published work
It’s got its own problems for why no one seriously argues with it in this hobby - namely it it’s attempt to be the ultimate power fantasy in fiction, it reads like a bunch of nonsense
Someone on SB actually tried recently to do just thatWhich is why it should not be seriously usable in debates.
It’s over bros
Viz removed the FTL line in their official translation and replaced it with ultrafast
Sounds about right. They're not exactly the most reliable people when it comes to translations.Isn't viz the same company that got a character's gender wrong in Kagurabach, long after they were confirmed to be female by the author?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?