Part 2 in further showing why there's no credibility with SB anymore(Part 3 will be Sukuna vs. the JoJo Antagonists LOL)
You can quite literally see it's a single continuous blast, the explosion is just an after effect. Sieg never tanks Brahmastra.
Again, tanks a stronger attack than Brahmastra, only loses a shoulderguard and is otherwise alive, why does he NEED to tank Brahmastra to prove himself?
The game shows us Siegfried takes no damage by clashing Balmung vs Tametomo's NP. But takes damage if he takes it directly.
So... we are gonna ignore that Siegfried took a 3rd Arrow that was as strong as the original to the chest and was just "injured"(but still capable of fighting and attacking) from that huh? We just pretend it was only the clashing of Balmung and Tametomo's NP that happened right? Okay then.
Your sole example of him 'tanking' anything (being generous and counting Brahmastra despite the fact he didn't) is an NP that Night Gawain blocked with a sword slash and a featless NP that's sole showing is clashing with Balmung.
Not seeing the uhh, way better part here.
How is Tametomo's NP featless when the aftershocks of it's attack destroyed 3 fucking islands?!
Atleast fucking try Ruby, fucking try to actually use logic and not slander and lies.
That is not how scaling works. You need to show that two attacks logically scale to one another. Just because they have basic similarities, doesn't mean they directly compare in terms of output and how it destroys things.
Okay, lets see how you state that Caladbolg cannot be around a similar tier then.
Excalibur, for example, does way more damage then Excalibur Galantine, but Galantine can destroy a larger number of things and a greater area (maybe no blow up as tough targets, but still). Destroying something like a mountain or something cares as much about the distribution of energy as it does about how much actual energy there is. If you have a super attack that focuses damage to the size of a tree and only effects a singular target, its not going to blow up a mountain, even if it would do more damage to that one target then a mountain destroying attack might.
Hell, the things you are trying to scale to explicitly point that out in the LN, where Balmung loses to Clarent specifically BECAUSE of how it distributes its power in its attack, making Clarent stronger at the distances they were using it. You can't just say "if scaling applies" in this case, you need to make the argument that it does because its not something you actually can directly say since Caladbolg is so different from even those two in function.

Yeah and you completely fucked it up...
One, Excalibur wiped out an entire half city with Excalibur in Hollow Atraxia and an Asteroid that was destroyed into a wider area that was already as tall as the Eiffiel Tower and it destroyed all of that too... and Excalibur Galatine has no real extra range to it that's above Excalibur, that's fanon nonsense
2. The logic used for why the Mountain feat doesn't matter makes zero goddamned sense. Again, in the Real World alone, we have weaponry that can hit for way harder than they should but ultimately disperses with far less damage for many reasons due to physics. We can blow up Mountains but that same force will not take out a city as shown with the Nuclear Detonation or otherwise.
By that logic, Tatsumi, Esdeath and practically everyone in fiction should never be stated to be X because apparently, they aren't destroy entire City Blocks by casually moving their arms around.
3. Balmung never lost power in the slightest in the LN nor did it ever lose against Clarent Blood Arthur in the LN, they both clash and ate each others attacks and lived due to various reasons.
Yes, but its a NP focused on prolonged usage to do that. People like to say "It scales to this!" and showing the Agartha feat, but it ignores that he was sitting there and... well, drilling into the island with his NP. It wasn't an instant thing. Most NPs that are blasts with high level of powers are a singular blasts that do everything at once, this was just a constant attack with a constant output. More over, it was a floating Island, so saying its Island destruction completely is not completely right since its not like it atomized the island or anything, it did enough damage to it that it collapsed and broke apart, cause, you know, its a floating island which once its not held together anymore will just start to crumble apart.
It doesn't just destroy landscapes because its powerful, its also because its function is suited to it. It acts like a drill with a wide range and power, meaning its specifically suited to destroying landscapes in a way that even something objectively superior to it might not be.
That is literally not fucking true, what garbage is this?!
I normally don't like using icons, but they're always generally a low end to start with on account of inflating the size to be visible on the map And I have nothing else to run with, so fuck it *shrugs* Chang'an = 245 pixels Rock Formation...
onelastforum.com
Before
After the instant his NP activated:
I do not understand in the slightest on how it "took it's time" to get to that state when it wasn't.
I know SB has lost any and all integrity as shown with their new rules but again, atleast use logic to why this can't make any sense, not just make shit up.