It’s a lack of cognitive flexibility and imagination to not be able to parse that much apart.
I just think it's just extreme lack of actually trying to do any real research or expanding a person's knowledge amongst stuff like that...
Even I who tended to stick to himself knew about the art of cinematography in it's basic form quite a few times to the point it shocks me that no one equally has ever heard of a Oner or a Tracking Shot or any of those other terms.

Cinematography - Wikipedia
Whether it’s an outlier or not isn’t the issue. It very well can be whether my math is correct or not. Measure what is seen, don’t try and make it fit your POV.
Nah, I can get that, I'm more pointing it out because it was someone else and they didn't really bring in anything themselves math wise to go against it or otherwise. It's just more fitting their POV rather than actually having it be expanded as it's the SB way.
Like I said, the presentation is hard to parse apart and nothing he measured comes out to any of the numbers his post churned out for results.
It’s like he had ChatGPT hallucinate a result for him or something.
Again, Brohan showed his work better, was often correct because the math was simple, and you could follow how he got from point A to B.
Yeah, it's all completely fucked and like I said before, I'm godawful at math but even when I know you are doing shit wrong... you are doing shit wrong.

Don't be proud of that sewage because no one else is going to be outside of SB and people already see SB as a joke for that amongst many other reasons.