RDK
Resplendent
If TAT flips town then I'm bad for voting for the probable scum instead?
If TAT flips town then I'm bad for voting for the probable scum instead?Well the sus is based upon me thinking that he is trying to derail from a potential scum in TAT.
If TAT flips town then he is just bad..
dunno why you're insulting me when I'm just playing the game lolI soft leaned him town as I've said like a dozen times before because his behavior was the same in the last game as a townie. Not strong enough to go beyond that tentatively or risk a day with no lynch. How would you read the entire shtick I had with Magic over him doing the 180 with all the pressure I put on his behavior and reads and press me as town until that one comment of me thinking TAT might be town could be construed from him?
Not sure if serious.
Do you Town read Xaldin more?I soft leaned him town as I've said like a dozen times before because his behavior was the same in the last game as a townie. Not strong enough to go beyond that tentatively or risk a day with no lynch. How would you read the entire shtick I had with Magic over him doing the 180 with all the pressure I put on his behavior and reads and press me as town until that one comment of me thinking TAT might be town could be construed from him?
Not sure if serious.
I don't really support this angle to be honest - he has spent quite a bit of real estate pushing for Xadlin, even beginning to form associatives based off of a scum flip, so it's a stretch and somewhat disingenuous to ascribe his motivation in pushing Xadlin as wanting to save a scum mate that's floundering.I’d be surprised if TAT were scum, and his teammate RDK saw us talking about scum having a chance to derail from TAT and then he thought it was such a good idea to go ahead and do it right there lol
dunno why you're insulting me when I'm just playing the game lol
I had him as a nullDo you Town read Xaldin more?
If TAT flips town then I'm bad for voting for the probable scum instead?
I'm a bit confused then - you are pretty indiffierent to Xadlin being lynched, you had a town read of TAT (soft), but you voted TAT over Xadlin? Who were you voting beforehand?I soft leaned him town as I've said like a dozen times before because his behavior was the same in the last game as a townie. Not strong enough to go beyond that tentatively or risk a day with no lynch. How would you read the entire shtick I had with Magic over him doing the 180 with all the pressure I put on his behavior and reads and press me as town until that one comment of me thinking TAT might be town could be construed from him?
I don't really support this angle to be honest - he has spent quite a bit of real estate pushing for Xadlin, even beginning to form associatives based off of a scum flip, so it's a stretch and somewhat disingenuous to ascribe his motivation in pushing Xadlin as wanting to save a scum mate that's floundering.
How much of the thread have you read?*rolls eyes
Aurelian portrayed a false game-state which directly benefited Xaldin and then voted the counter-wagon when he doesn't have a solid read on either.Yes for making yourself look sus like that.
You also used this reasoning to sus aurelian so whats up with you?
Sussing others for things you also just did?
How much of the thread have you read?
Aurelian portrayed a false game-state which directly benefited Xaldin and then voted the counter-wagon when he doesn't have a solid read on either.
I (with a clear idea of the game-state) voted for my main scum read all phase.
How is it the same?
Fang is looking really scummy this game.
Yeah. Actually agree with this.Psychic can probably go by the way - she spent enough time to send in her shots for the mini gme, but has a total of three posts so far in the main thread and most of them aren't related to the game whatsoever. I think she's very clearly avoiding the thread.
Until the WU.can i still post?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?