T-Pein™
The Nexus
we know he is mean when town.
What do we know, though?
Did you read all his posts?we know he is mean when town.
Can you at least give reasons for some reads? Just a small summary would do. I‘m not ignoring you at all.Lethal plays and gets ignored. Town can go fuck themselves. I hope wolves win, again, even if it gives me a loss
I'm specifically asking about the point I raised regarding him. I can see one plausible explanation for it - I obviously won't be providing it until he answers.I would say his posts this game feel a little off, but that might also be partly OMGUS, so I might be biased here. Not in the best position to judge anything Tweet related in this game. Feel like he‘s a bit too hung up on his scum read on me and doesn‘t really want to reevaluate here, though.
As per original post, no explanations will be provided. But you're nice.Can you at least give reasons for some reads? Just a small summary would do. I‘m not ignoring you at all.
Trying to be unbiased here, this is a valid point. But Ig it can also be seen as some kind of self pres on your end if you refuse to work with Ekko now if you‘re scum because last time you played like this you got D1‘d. So basically it can be seen as you trying to play the reverse of what you did in Fang‘s game to avoid a confrontation with somebody who got you lynched in a past game. And Ekko can be persistent and can have the threadpull to do this. Saying you are playing like in Fang‘s game, however, is evidently false. It‘s exactly the reverse in fact.Oh yeah, I recalled one issue I had with Tweet - him saying my handling of Ekko looked similar to how I treated him as an SK reeks of TMI to me. I obviously know I'm not scum, and he, if scum, would know I'm not Mafia at least, so using the SK angle would be a way for him to justify his read while not actually catching Mafia.
Moreover, it's pretty silly. What part reminds him of it, exactly? In that game, I was playing towards the town because my wincon required it, and more to the point, I was going out of my way to work with Ekko, which is the complete opposite of this (it's in large part what is informing my dismission of Ekko here, actually). I don't really see how anyone can believe I'm handling Ekko the same way in this game, as I did that one.
Surely you've played enough games with him to know that he's tried to fake this in the past?we know he is mean when town.
This characterisation is pretty silly though - Ekko "got me lynched" by breaking the rules of the game *and* with hard mech I had nothing to fight against with. Unless Ultra has included exactly this, after claiming that all lie detectors are bad by default, in this game, Ekko getting me lynched Day 1 probably isn't all that much a concern to me. Even Ekko admits he wouldn't have gotten his lynch without the mech evidence (which was a stacked deck). Moreover, you've seen scum me happily engage with Ekko many, many times - so I don't think this is a thought you've properly fleshed out or developed.Trying to be unbiased here, this is a valid point. But Ig it can also be seen as some kind of self pres on your end if you refuse to work with Ekko now if you‘re scum because last time you played like this you got D1‘d. So basically it can be seen as you trying to play the reverse of what you did in Fang‘s game to avoid a confrontation with somebody who got you lynched in a past game. And Ekko can be persistent and can have the threadpull to do this. Saying you are playing like in Fang‘s game, however, is evidently false. It‘s exactly the reverse in fact.
Hence the "can" be seen. If that was the arguing point I would agree that it would make sense to assume so. But if the point is you play like you did in Fang's game it's just false.This characterisation is pretty silly though - Ekko "got me lynched" by breaking the rules of the game *and* with hard mech I had nothing to fight against with. Unless Ultra has included exactly this, after claiming that all lie detectors are bad by default, in this game, Ekko getting me lynched Day 1 probably isn't all that much a concern to me. Even Ekko admits he wouldn't have gotten his lynch without the mech evidence (which was a stacked deck). Moreover, you've seen scum me happily engage with Ekko many, many times - so I don't think this is a thought you've properly fleshed out or developed.
No time for this lmaoLethal plays and gets ignored. Town can go fuck themselves. I hope wolves win, again, even if it gives me a loss
We have like 29h left in the day. Can we not hammer yet, please?No time for this lmao
vote lynch: lethal
Surely you've played enough games with him to know that he's tried to fake this in the past?
Last time he was caught he resorted to trolling and I've seen some trolly posts the past few pages too tbh.
I interpreted that completely differently. Thought you were defending him lolThats what I am saying.....
He is over correcting again.
Day will be granted a 24 hour extension since the site was down for half a day. It's majority, so you can take the time or leave it. Thus from the time of this post, you have approx 30 hours.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?