Which ones?But I like his other posts so I'm not sure.
I know, but his presence is better than it has been when he's scum - see last game here for example #1.Xadlin already made an excuse few pages before this where he said he is not doing much day 1.
I'm Red Night from WorstGenOh, I've played with you before? When was that?
The ones where he's actively trying to clear Luka come to mind. His scum play to me felt very out of pocket and irrational. I still disagree with the reads sometimes but it's more effort to thought on his part, that makes him feel towny to me imo.Which ones?
Not sure how Im supposed to get any kind of serious read on him lol. He has 6 posts, 5 of which are complete fluff and I think this which is his only serious one?No scum on that list
Why would I make it up about her? Retro can sometimes actually often head into psychobabble talks about something and make a point can't always be clear. It's not inherently scummy, it'd just her process imo.I dont really think Retro's posts have been discombobulated though? Are you just making this up? I've found her posts pretty straight forward to follow so far and I am somebody that usually has no patience for reading them
And?I caught up soon.
No I get thatWhy would I make it up about her? Retro can sometimes actually often head into psychobabble talks about something and make a point can't always be clear. It's not inherently scummy, it'd just her process imo.
can you define underwhelming in that context. i dont think doflas first posts were underwhelming. ultra called him out for chest puffing which is like the oppositeI'm agreeing with his takeaway, my reasoning is my own. I dunno why *you* find Dofla "sus", that's why I find him so.
doesnt matter if i find him sus after or before u. its my first time actually reading the threadAlright so in summary
You out of the blue finger Dofla as scum
Then you remark that my suspicion on him was the only redeeming quality from my posts
Then you critique both me and Ratchet for insufficiently identifying this scum read, which you are only now just identifying
lol
this isnt an overexplainationexplaining his null reads - scum by his own logic
well my issue with him is he gave a future reason to justify a past vote and then doubled down on itNot sure how Im supposed to get any kind of serious read on him lol. He has 6 posts, 5 of which are complete fluff and I think this which is his only serious one?
Can't say it strikes me one way or the other
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?