every day as in every phase, I mean. With the exception of D1 I guess.every day 6 pages in?
or every day after day 3?
Scum don’t say that. They’ll feel some moral obligation to their team and care about perception in the thread.Yeah, but can you elaborate on any of the statements you make lol?
dalton is bringing up a post from page 6 and questioning my resolve in it as if i am supposed to have strong reads by that point. what do u make of thisevery day as in every phase, I mean. With the exception of D1 I guess.
I'm point out a contrast in your resolve last game and this one, is how I'd put it.
What I'm saying is you've got Craig and Me as null even though we've contributed to counter wagoning Lethal, and in the case of Craig he is voting for you directly.
Moreover, it's an actual rule of the game not to request a rep in-thread :slipScum don’t say that. They’ll feel some moral obligation to their team and care about perception in the thread.
I can follow CPs stated thought process though. Hes wrong, but I cant expect him to know that cause I wouldnt think I was obvtown either really
You are favouring a push on a player you understand over one you dont - again this isnt scummy in isolation
You are a player who routinely and comprehensively claims to have the game in his bag. And is, from my experience, routinely and comprehensively wrong.im afraid it doesnt work this way
if u want to shade me with a statement that because i am ekko i am supposed to have strong reads by 6 pages in you need to establish that from somewhere
you have 2 town games from me here. elden ring and death note (protown indie)
in elden ring i only had a strong read day 2 onward after fang flipped. in death note i had one day 3 when i was being wagoned
i dont "think" you are wrong. i know you are. i want to know where you came up with this
Its WIFOM. He could know he's not making end-game and be trying to set-up mislynches in the interim.I‘ve never seen his scum games, but according to himself if he‘s scum he tends to set somebody up to win the game in case he gets offed. So from this would it not be apparent to the ones who know his scum meta to deduce his partners from this?
But yeah, it‘s ultimately WIFOM I suppose.
If I understand it correctly, I think he's seeing a change in posting style between both games, and I get the same impression, ngldalton is bringing up a post from page 6 and questioning my resolve in it as if i am supposed to have strong reads by that point. what do u make of this
I said some years ago we should modkill this kind of thing and it was actually enforced.Moreover, it's an actual rule of the game not to request a rep in-thread :slip
1. Dalton
2. T-Pein
4. Grammaton
6. Lethal
7. Hans TWEETenberg
8. Ultra
9. CraigPelton
10. Goth Boy
11. Psychic
12. Aurelian
14. Black Pegged Dragon
15.Big ManRDK v2
16. PHEN0M
17. Doddsy
18. Evans
19. Nevermind
20. Rugrat
21.IndigoAlco v2
22. Ekko
23. Tiara
Tbh ngl
You're not being easy on us because you're hard bussing lethal and town will do the work for you, right?
I see. You know him better, so I keep that in mind. (I hope you‘re Town this game btw).Its WIFOM. He could know he's not making end-game and be trying to set-up mislynches in the interim.
Anything's possible with Gramma, and I think its important to factor this into your theories.
(I'm currently leaning town on Gramma, FWIW).
Rather err on the side of caution until there’s a scum flip.Do you have any play based reads?
These all seem to be linked to role or other stuff
dalton again i dont "think" you are wrong. I know you are. I never claim to have solved the game by page 6 ever. in elden ring i was struggling for awhile just to pick a side. only after ultra/ratchet/tpein flipped where i started getting my head into the gameYou are a player who routinely and comprehensively claims to have the game in his bag. And is, from my experience, routinely and comprehensively wrong.
Yet your conviction never waivers - which one of the most frustrating things when playing with you.
I've never once said you need to have the entire game solved or anything of that nature, fwiw. But even if you didn't have many concrete reads, you would at the very least imply to have these reads, if for nothing more than a reaction so that you could then... generate concrete reads.
Your play this game has not fallen under the umbrella of what I deem to be your town game.
And before you ask me to go find specific proof from previous games, no, I won't be doing that because I can't be arsed. If anyone thinks I'm in the wrong on this, they're more than welcome to take it up with me.
you are missing the pointIf I understand it correctly, I think he's seeing a change in posting style between both games, and I get the same impression, ngl
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?