Anyway, I think I'm coming around to the Masons claiming. Probably character too but I don't imagine there is a pressing requirement for it, more ticking a box.
i'll not comment on this more tbhJust seems unnecessary, no?
average midnight commentary
i assume if i ask u which direction u prefer u wont answer?
Why not? Don't you want to play nice with me?i'll not comment on this more tbh
sure. another topic thoWhy not? Don't you want to play nice with me?
Was voting RDK just because apes-strong-together but that post about Flower and Evans feels really forced, I could see it.
He did call a post of mine based though which makes it a bit hard
so far
lethal or nevermind can be scum. entered with flavor talk and nothing else
gram has some posts observing and shading a bit towards me and ratchet and flowa. no followup beyond asking questions
bld/psychic just checked in but nothing else.
goth, if hes midnight, is going to be semi unreadable day 1 lol
ratchets posturing to me felt a little forced. interactions with the rest r okay
doddsy looks more easy going early and not playing dumb. looks townie
ultra looks okay. always strong day 1 entrances. interactions with ratchet r good
flowa looks okay. if the neighbor has 1 town 1 scum i favor her being the townie in it rn
if they r both town its basically like a cop clear for 2 players. its rly powerfulNo,
Mason chat is just noise.
Consider them vanillas and move on.
I expect nothing from those guys
if they r both town
thoughts on lethal entrance wud be great too
expecting him to be more excited about a wresting game
Expect nothing huh? Oh, that's a mistake brother
i think entrance using ratchet's post in itself is poor look, but not necessarily scummy on its own
I am asking you because from last game you claim to know how to read him, or at least have a feel of his play.
and i certainly dont care to appease u either. i asked u about lethal read because u say u r good at reading him
and asked about ratchet because he is the only thing of meat that we had a small discussion about, as u requested I ask u about that
I got ur thought on both matters, which wesn't rly established in case of ratchet's read but I have them atleast
I'll say I got what I asked from that interaction. u didn't rly ask me any question to continue
not a strong one but any read wud be good
he hasn't commented on lethal at all until I asked
what we have so far
1. this is a theme lethal likes and knows very much
2. makes one entrance post from ratchet's post about flavor
3. goes MIA after
I think this may be enough for an early read, certainly from those who claim to read him good
I for instance am leaning slight scum on lethal just from one post. you gotta start somewhere I mean
excited enough to shit talk it, roleplay, flavor spec yada yada - general excitements players often feel when they enjoy the themeWhat's with this shade? How excited can one be for a theme? I have theme knowledge
i was right about u
and i had doddsy scum from his day 1 read on flowa
that isn't the point. you don't have strong reason to scum read me or other players but u r down just to kill for the sake of killing
not saying u did it here but u r prone to it. i am still unhappy about the hammer on me last game truth be told
"this much" is an exaggerationAll this content around Gram here but just looks a bunch like word salad. And seeking his clarification on reading me of all people? The town Ekko I know doesn't seek validation this much
what?
we can't know this.
Just like said b4.
Last time I was mason in a Poyser or WS game I was scum and my mason was town.
Claiming will only help scum identify the non Power Roles.
Doesn't do anything for town.
Mason should want to be killed by scum thinking they are a doc or cop instead of them taking a shot somewhere else.
because i made the mistake of following the majority and then my reads got fked afterwardBut you didn't push him
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?