He's getting bandwagoned because people dislike how he talks instead of a valid reasonQuestion Mark
It was suggested to you that the alignment of the partner couldn't be trusted, and then you come out with this? Yeah I don't believe you arrived at this naturally.
He's getting bandwagoned because people dislike how he talks instead of a valid reason
im mid read back and have to object to the bolded
I don’t doubt she’s a mason
I’m saying there’s no reason to think she’s town based on her posting stuff that’s easily fakeable. That’s not questioning the veracity of her claim, it’s questioning her alignment.
So your reason is a meta sample of what, 2 games?
Yes, of course you don't need 100's of posts. But without evidence in the firm of some kind of trail then it's hard for me to think you genuinely just happened to settle on me because of *apathy*. I think we both know it's not, you even say you're fine sheeping, so I don't know why you felt compelled to dress it up as anything else in the first place.
And instead of correcting yourself, you left it because...? Don't answer, I don't really care.
...yeah I think I'll just get some sleep instead of this to be honest. My ceiling would probably be more receptive to dialogue.
I'm sure you've got good reasons to establish why I'm linked to Gram on this-
Ah, wait, of course you don't. Silly me. This is why there is no reason to engage with you. You're approaching the whole thing in bad faith, and when you receive an answer that satisfies what you originally asked, you alter your line of questioning to appear to press the upper hand. I don't know why you think it works, it doesn't, but you try anyway.
And because I already know how you'll try to spin this, no it's not a defence of Gram. He could well flip scum. It won't be because you arbitrarily decided to put him and I together and decreed that there must be 1 scum between us for "phoning it in".
As for scum reads, a few, but not much.
Yes, we should all make claims and then have nothing to back them up with, and when we're asked to support them, we should say it's only day 1, and without flips and night actions, we can't do any more.
>I think
>I don't agree
>I assumed
>I think
Once I find a compelling reason to care even a little bit about any of the above, or understand why that should compass my thinking at all, I will let you be the first to know. Next.
Uh huh, which is why I've looked to not engage over extended period of times frequently over the course of the game, but had to, because I've had to explain the absolute pits like why a shark gif implies humour or whatever. Intellectually-dishonest. I haven't been seeking this shit, it has been flung at me instead, and the best you have is to observe the volume of interactions and interpose that *I* must be the one farming this?
No, that's not the point I'm making. I'm saying that your "motive" angle doesn't really work because any perceived "lack of effort" does not carry to conception that I'm scum with it. Also, let me just point out how ironic it is for you to whine incessantly about being held to unfair standards over your Elden Ring mislynch, yet me not going full aggro on Day 1 means I haven't contributed anything meaningful to the game. Absurd.
I don't believe you've even begun to make a sincere attempt towards this.
Ah, there we go. So you want an explanation yet don't care to read it. Welp, I'm sure that will work out well for you.
He's getting bandwagoned because people dislike how he talks instead of a valid reason
Telling me that you have not seen me apathetic *is* meta. That was your justification as to why said apathy was scum-indicative. It's not just about the votes also - it comes after 3 other players have expressed some level of scum read that aren't voting, all fairly easy to glean from the last few pages.It’s day 1, Im playing off gut feeling here not meta reads. I’m not a trail guy, not my play style, I don’t have the time or energy. Also, I’m not sheeping on this though? Again, I’m 2nd person on wagon, not like you’re leading that I just jumped on.
Also yes, having given time for it to percolate, I’d be favouring ekko over ratchet in a T/W situation
there’s an observation I have about ratchets play as scum that’s kinda triggering me which is a shame cause I infinitely prefer his style
Telling me that you have not seen me apathetic *is* meta. That was your justification as to why said apathy was scum-indicative. It's not just about the votes also - it comes after 3 other players have expressed some level of scum read that aren't voting, all fairly easy to glean from the last few pages.
Lad I was referring to Tweet here with his vote of you.In what way?
Proving I’m a DV by voting someone who won’t get wagonned when I’m asleep lol
Frozen in wolf chat!!!I'm also pretty busy this weekend, so sorry if i'm not as active
will do my best to help town anyway!
That's...that's not it. At all. Are you even following the game?He's getting bandwagoned because people dislike how he talks instead of a valid reason
I’m truly not following what you mean hereExcept that you said you doubted the alignment of her defenders moreso, and then proceeded to vote for Ekko. Maintaining that I'm wrong is a valid defense, especially if you're vindicated, but now I'm more confused as to what your objective is
I’m truly not following what you mean here
when you said veracity of her claim, what did you mean?
Dismissive maybe - I'm perfectly in reason to question your motives when you also have some pressure building on you and you try to present yourself as having naturally come to voting me as opposed to having any other agenda (such as saving yourself).Said i don’t associate you with it, I’m sure you have been.
Well if you were to flip in the near future it would be great to look into why they’re all talk and no action. I’m bout my business boy! My vote seems to have struck a cord with you it appears, getting a tad defensive and dismissive
Care to elaborate?
Any thoughts on Gram's "Bray Wyatt" comment?Lad I was referring to Tweet here with his vote of you.
Frozen in wolf chat!!!
That's...that's not it. At all. Are you even following the game?
I think if you doubt her claim it goes without saying you doubt she's town, correct me if I'm wrong
Townie but not mason.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?