T-Pein™
The Nexus
Then why did you suggest it?
To me it looked like you were trying to save him in the thread and he botched it.
The problem is the "out" in this scenario would be if he chose to say "oh I was just talking about flavor". He claimed a role. So this is bs.
I'm not thinking about who I'm familiar with or not just reacting to whatever pings me whoever it's fromI've noticed. You have leaned more into interacting with and buddying up to players less familiar with your play - would you agree that this would be in contrast to the previous two games here? Entirely plausible it is coincidental, of course.
Wouldn't call it low hanging fruit but your relationship with him and how it pans out is more my interest, saying outright so nothing is being hidden about my intentions. That's how I like to handle my POE.Tldr mid is low hanging fruit.
And sussing him d1 is weak af.
Get better content.
It's curious, though. Usually you would expect to "vibe with" the familiar moreso than not.I'm not thinking about who I'm familiar with or not just reacting to whatever pings me whoever it's from
I'm not reading his alignment based on that claim either way.
TPein is insisting that he should be scum read but doesn't want to get the other mason to claim to verify a disparity
Why notI'm not reading his alignment based on that claim either way.
huhIt's curious, though. Usually you would expect to "vibe with" the familiar moreso than not.
counts a bit less given that its lethal who often times puts himself in unfavorable situations even as town. i also do that too so I understand lethal a bitDoes it being Lethal disqualify any part of any of my interactions? You wanted me to be more engaged, I've been more engaged, and it's on the wrong person so it counts less or whatever.
Surely you remember though that he's not too easy of a catch as scum and not to be read town too euphorically?Yeah but the last time I saw you as scum was nearly 2 years ago so my memory of your scum game is foggy. I don't think you were scum in any of the WG games we played together
Good point about IndigoI think Psychic said that after the second mason came out? I think she said something along the line of 'double masons can't be good for town, one must be scum'. So it had nothing to do with knowing the host, but I think just a reaction to there being a second pair of masons.
Does Indigo not get any benefit of the doubt in your eyes for claiming second mason pairing? Is Flower a town read for you here? Obviously you're much more familiar with Poyser games and how he might handle mason pairings, but in my eyes, Flower first coming out with a mason claim and Indigo doing it second, show me some town motivation to be open and honest. I do agree that Indigo hasn't really done anything for posting, though, and my town read of him is solely based on him coming out as the second mason pairing. I'll also admit I've lost track of Flower a bit in this game because of her claim.
Not at all. In this case, T-Pein would be the exception that proves the rule, or whatever. I just find it interesting that you've gone from back-to-back games where you, overall, tend to find yourself on the same page with people you know more (especially Elden Ring), notably both town games, and yet here you seem to be more on an island.huh
do you think I've only played a couple games with t-pein?
Does Indigo get no credit, though, for coming forward with the second mason pairing? Just for argument sake, if Indigo is wolf, that means he had the wherewithal to get ahead of a potentially bad situation for him. Do you seeing that be possible or true?
err I was mainly vibing with ultra last game?Not at all. In this case, T-Pein would be the exception that proves the rule, or whatever. I just find it interesting that you've gone from back-to-back games where you, overall, tend to find yourself on the same page with people you know more (especially Elden Ring), notably both town games, and yet here you seem to be more on an island.
Then why did you suggest it?
To me it looked like you were trying to save him in the thread and he botched it.
Overall null, but I have felt that some of his questioning has leaned more into being "correct" than actually pursuing a read, and I think it was T-Pein who pointed out that RDK had been responding to quite a few votes with "why". What T-Pein missed was that he had done the same thing with my vote on Lethal too, so I think he (T-Pein) may have a point there. That said, I haven't really had any issue with his overall posting.could I ask for ur current read of RDK? I'm thinking going there next
Yes, but you disagreeing with Poyser on some things and agreeing with Ultra on others is not the point I'm making, It's where you find yourself settling in, and I suspect you are intentionally distant from those that can read you better, here.err I was mainly vibing with ultra last game?
like whoYes, but you disagreeing with Poyser on some things and agreeing with Ultra on others is not the point I'm making, It's where you find yourself settling in, and I suspect you are intentionally distant from those that can read you better, here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?