Game Ranked EastEnders Mafia

[The X]

Trying to fluff still?
Found a live one...
Also I watched Peaky Blinders.
My fave is Arthur

Ye I was gonna vote when i finished reading too so u can have town points for beating me to it

vote xenos

I ask a simple question and you vote me?

Lmao [Vote Lynch Black Pegged Dragon]

Not that it matters, but this is the xenos progression. Tpein called xenos out for fluffing (on page two) then voted for him. Poyser followed Tpein's vote (for little reason). I voted xenos after the TSA reaction he had and it seems his collapse starts with his reply to me.

 

[Grammaton]

The evidence is the claim, by the way. If you think that the claim is compelling then you obviously think he's town. There isn't any further context that you're missing, it's the claim straight up.

i don’t think this is accurate at all - an absorber is NAI itself, it’s what he claims to have absorbed and the circumstances that would need to go into that

why did you even post this?

 

[Goth Boy]

I got and idea, let's sync our votes together so we can have more power in this thread, we are being drowned out by the louder but no substance voices

unvote vote OLU

Vote Alco instead

 

[Ratchet]

I alluded to it. He went on to A) Pretty freely town read tweet and reverse that read and B) for a rather abstract reason. And I don't think that fits the profile of what your case on him is - a scum who needed a rubber stamped reason to push town tweet - on both accounts.

No, again, you're misunderstanding my position. I don't know how, I made this clear earlier. I think a town flip on tweet looks better on Rugrat as he has no reason to force in a scum read on a mislynch that only makes him look bad. On the other hand if tweet is scum he would want to get some credit, hence inventing a new reason to scum read him to look like he's playing a part. My position was a town tweet flip looks bad for Poyser and good for rugrat, and a scum tweet flip looks bad for rugrat and good for Poyser.

 

[The X]

I’m not emotional I just find it pointless talking to you when you don’t listen to a word I say, never re-evaluate anything and just make dumb digs. Like I get frustrated at trying to deal with you and then I get conscious of the fact that the rest of the thread doesn’t want to read us arguing for 20 pages in a discussion that goes absolutely no where as every discussion with you ends up

I listen to what you say, I just don't believe what you're saying this game. I also do re-evaluate (I got sussed in Death Note for completely dropped my D1 scum read of Lethal). And please show me where I made dumb digs? You always start the chirping first.

 

[TAT]

No because poor Imposter had an idea and people told him no. I stand by Imposter

 

[The X]

That you dislike Dest

Poyser takes it personal.

 

[Ratchet]

i don’t think this is accurate at all - an absorber is NAI itself, it’s what he claims to have absorbed and the circumstances that would need to go into that

why did you even post this?

What he claims to have absorbed is part of the claim I was referring to, yes.

 

[Aurelian]

I alluded to it. He went on to A) Pretty freely town read tweet and reverse that read and B) for a rather abstract reason. And I don't think that fits the profile of what your case on him is - a scum who needed a rubber stamped reason to push town tweet - on both accounts.

Can you elaborate on the context here?

 

[T-Pein™]

it seems his collapse starts with his reply to me

Lol no?

 

[Grammaton]

What he claims to have absorbed is part of the claim I was referring to, yes.

well then yes, it’s possible it’s a worked piece of collaboration but it’s not a very compelling argument for a variety of reasons

 

[T-Pein™]

Pegg really wants that "cred" for pushing some indies huh.
Sus....

 

[Poyser]

Vote Alco instead

Why

 

[Ultra]

No, again, you're misunderstanding my position. I don't know how, I made this clear earlier. I think a town flip on tweet looks better on Rugrat as he has no reason to force in a scum read on a mislynch that only makes him look bad. On the other hand if tweet is scum he would want to get some credit, hence inventing a new reason to scum read him to look like he's playing a part. My position was a town tweet flip looks bad for Poyser and good for rugrat, and a scum tweet flip looks bad for rugrat and good for Poyser.

I was trying to see how his switch up informed your view of him and you've made it pretty clear that's not a consideration. I think this is invited by my earlier comment to Poyser about how you've kinda planted your flag at a singular point. If tweet flips town, your take on Rugrat is pretty stale since you can just as easily argue he TMI'd him and got cold feet if he perceives town tweet improving or is afraid of retribution from a stump

 

[Poyser]

I listen to what you say, I just don't believe what you're saying this game. I also do re-evaluate (I got sussed in Death Note for completely dropped my D1 scum read of Lethal). And please show me where I made dumb digs? You always start the chirping first.

You literally started by talking inane shite about me changing my read due to needing my hand held by gram kek. I don’t always start the chirping at all, I obviously made the grand mistake of finding your play sus early in the game

 

[Ultra]

@Ratchet This was your last response to me. I was looking for further evaluation of his play from you, and you didn't take the opportunity to do so. I'm not going to squeeze water out of a rock, especially because I don't feel strongly about Rugrat's alignment - I just don't follow your reasoning and I think your read of him demands a bit more explanation than what you've given if you're making a push.

I alluded to it. He went on to A) Pretty freely town read tweet and reverse that read and B) for a rather abstract reason. And I don't think that fits the profile of what your case on him is - a scum who needed a rubber stamped reason to push town tweet - on both accounts.

I was trying to see how his switch up informed your view of him and you've made it pretty clear that's not a consideration. I think this is invited by my earlier comment to Poyser about how you've kinda planted your flag at a singular point. If tweet flips town, your take on Rugrat is pretty stale since you can just as easily argue he TMI'd him and got cold feet if he perceives town tweet improving or is afraid of retribution from a stump

Woof woof woof

 

[xenos5]

.

That was egregious too, but when someone comes in the thread and tries hard to create discussion that is not only not game related but also not even theme related then it’s a pretty giant red flag lol. It’s not like he was reacting to stuff being talked about in the thread. I saw X as the guy that just piled onto the bandwagon but then over compensated by going harder lol

I would have if I or any other player actually knew anything about this theme lol.

Though now I do want a Doctor Who game at some point down the line. I could imagine some pretty fun mechanics like going through the different regenerations for The Doctor and The Master

 

[Poyser]

Also you’re lying, you never listen or take on board a word I say when we are interacting. This is literally the 3rd game we’ve played together in a row where you’ve come at me with dumb shit and dismissed every one of my rebuttals and not re-evaluated or taken anything on board. As I said, it’s just an exercise in futility. You’re the one player I’m fine to put on ignore once I’m satisfied I’ve figured out your alignment because your posts don’t add anything of value to the game for me

 

[Ratchet]

I was trying to see how his switch up informed your view of him and you've made it pretty clear that's not a consideration. I think this is invited by my earlier comment to Poyser about how you've kinda planted your flag at a singular point. If tweet flips town, your take on Rugrat is pretty stale since you can just as easily argue he TMI'd him and got cold feet if he perceives town tweet improving or is afraid of retribution from a stump

Given that I pointed it out fairly early, I could argue that had something to do with it too...

I'm not really contesting that my argument revolves around a single behavioural incident, it obviously does, but it's the most noteworthy to me. I'm happy to give him a re-read but I'd be surprised if there is anything in there compelling enough to warrant further consideration.

 

[Poyser]

Fwiw I don’t hate ratchets point about Rugrat