• We are currently rolling out incremental alterations to the forum. Don't freak! You aren't going crazy.

Game Ranked The Traitors Mafia

Status
Not open for further replies.

hime

Exceptional
Pronouns
She/Her
shit i accidentally deleted a post @T-Pein™
it was a reply to ultra saying one person was in the game and the other wasnt
context being whether ultra subbed for tat or OLU
 

Magic

Resplendent
kind of sux day 1 reads wont be very accurate with recruits
Breh you can't disregard all day 1 reads for the sake of a recruit. Hunting the main 3 first then the recruit last always makes the most sense, especially as you don't know when they'll recruit.
 

Magic

Resplendent
i made a "promise" not to post so much but the faithful heart inside of me wants to post until all traitors are banished from this mansion
Your posting less shouldn't mean that ratio for your content related posts compared to fluff posts decreases heavily
 

Magic

Resplendent
does this mean you're going to be mean this game rather than the nice guy act you pulled in ekkos
I'm always nice!

What did you think of ekko and poyser on the first page.

Do you think nat disliking the voting style was genuine?
 

Magic

Resplendent
They usually do get 2 recruits iirc. Or at least 2 attempts, don’t think I’ve ever seen any of them get 2 successful recruits

I think it’s probably just one for game purposes tho, no way gram and big man sign off on 2 recruits you would hope
This is also boring.
 

Magic

Resplendent
i didnt feel that he was going for good guy points. why not vote him if its scummy?
Why not. What did you think.

I left the thread after reading post 3. But yes I agree post 3 was sufficient. Why did you have thoughts for this but not poysers nat vote? Was my lack of.vote more interesting?
 

Ultra

THE BEAR
Moderator
If his posting less coincides with lower percentage of quality posts(combined with overall post) I'll dare say he's scummy.

So to be clear, you're not accusing him of posting trash, you're establishing that if he posts trash hypothetically, that you will punish him for it.

Which for me still begs the question of what the point of your post is, to be quite honest. You proposing hypotheticals before catching up with his contributions is pointless, no?
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
For example this post gave me the impression he had convinced himself into a vote
Huh? You thought I was gonna lock in my vote on the second page kek?

Natalja’s entrance is the most sus to me. They were in the thread but seemed scared to post. Just posted about the vote mechanic and dipped kek. They were still around tho, cos also responded to ekkos question about being faithful
 

Ultra

THE BEAR
Moderator
Like, you're not telling me you have a bad/fluffy impression of Ekko's post and you're warning him if he keeps it up he's gonna get the rope.

You're telling me you have a neutral impression (You're still catching up apparently, so I don't see how you could even categorize his posts as such at this point), but for some reason have decided to wave your fist in his direction for no apparent reason rather than rectify your lack of an impression by simply being informed.

:whathekong
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
i want to yeet magic more. dont see what he said regarding poyser wanting to buy good guy points

but then poyser doesnt even comment on it

maybe one of them scum atleast

7KU7Fqx.png
I haven’t addressed it for a reason lol. It’s a stupid point obviously
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
Actually vote. That's why I think treating it as a one and done deal instead of doing the theatrics of fake votes and fake count counters etc is probably better. Also shows skin-in-the-game.
Wait hang on

Do you realise votes get locked when you send them in lol?
 

Ultra

THE BEAR
Moderator
Huh? You thought I was gonna lock in my vote on the second page kek?

Natalja’s entrance is the most sus to me. They were in the thread but seemed scared to post. Just posted about the vote mechanic and dipped kek. They were still around tho, cos also responded to ekkos question about being faithful

I was more talking about how you trodded out your reasoning - it looked like you took an observation of "hey here's a slam dunk" and then rolled with it rather than organic suspicion. The element of the vote being real or not really doesn't matter.

To be fair though if that post is the sole thing I found suspicious from you I probably wouldn't bat an eye. Found your calm entrance more jarring.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top