Aurelian kinda defensive. Get being defensive not really a knock on him per say.
So er, what’s your take here? He’s defensive because I’m making him defend himself, that in and of itself isn’t indicative of anything is it?
Aurelian kinda defensive. Get being defensive not really a knock on him per say.
So er, what’s your take here? He’s defensive because I’m making him defend himself, that in and of itself isn’t indicative of anything is it?
I don't see it as scummy. He wrote a lot though.... Whatever.
What do you think about what he wrote? Does it make sense to you?
You claim this, I'm not under the impression I believe your saying this though.May I just ask why exactly you keep repeating that I’m following BPD? It doesn’t stack up because my stated reason for voting you has 0 to do with anything he said,
Then you are being crystal-clear disingenuous. If you wanted to be analytical and playing to win as town, you'd be fully aware that BPD has a long history of making very bold flat-faced accusations without much proof behind them and zeroing in on a single post I made while lying about it being a delibarate attempt to "copy" my entrance from the last game should've been a red flag to you about him, not me.it’s specifically to do with how you responded - what he said is virtually immaterial which I’ve been pretty clear about.
This seems to be defensive on your part. Especially since I already exhaustively explained why its more suspicious your following in BPD's footsteps on something you know has zero tangible proof to operate as me being suspicious for not bothering with an initial rebuttal but I suspect you already know that and are just ignoring it.What exactly is the benefit of being ‘careful’ here - what am I supposed to be waiting for? If you do stuff that makes me think you’re town, I’ll move my vote, just as I do any other game?
Why wouldn't you?Why would I need BPD to work in tandem with if I were trying to mislynch you?
I'm not unduly bothered by you advocating for my lynch, even as misguided as it is. I'm more annoyed you are intentionally misrepresenting my entire response to X, then having the absolute nerve to say I'm taking your words and misusing them when you started this with a strawman about me calling X scum when I said it could be scummy. I'm not going to be lynched today either way and I know what my slot is.I’ll clear it up for you - I think you are pretty blatantly scum and will be strongly advocating for your lynch. I think you are wilfully misrepresenting the reason for my vote as you think it’s your best chance to survive
Ya this . kinda emotional player. Not tacticaldoes what he say usually make sense to you? does it always stack up logically and straight forwardly?
does what he say usually make sense to you? does it always stack up logically and straight forwardly?
Garbageunvote
vote Aurelian
You are the one who needs to have the gun to his head.This feels like a very loaded question, do not like.
For the sake of argument, like 90% of players he is prone to saying stuff that makes no sense, however the best way to weigh it up is get as much on the record as possible, no?
Not really. Looks like Evans is going to stay in the "lynch people who annoy me" lane so he's cop/vig fodder imo, don't wanna bother with him anymore@CraigPelton any early takes?
lowkey sound fake bc i never claimed being part of your team. im actually a traitor with no fake claim and you outed urself over it. sad.jpgYeah, but your role is weaker. I will eventually have to buss you, as your Godfather I need to secure my position.
Did Ratchet gave me that role on purpose? LOL!
This feels like a very loaded question, do not like.
For the sake of argument, like 90% of players he is prone to saying stuff that makes no sense, however the best way to weigh it up is get as much on the record as possible, no?
???Man the duel role is popular in this site.
No, its more that Grammaton is being absolutely disingenuous and misrepresenting anything I said and then falsely accusing me of doing that to him. If you look carefully back on my exchange with him so far, he doesn't actually address anything about the fact his vote and tunneling on me immediately after BPD drops a literally bullshit post on the spot with zero evidence or proof to it, just a one-liner and fucks off from the thread.ya but he's more prone to it than most. he can dig himself into a hole by standing his ground due to the way he perceives things playing out not exactly playing out what it's like in reality.
such as him attributing your push to bpd's one line or questioning if it's possible you two are working in a tandem effort against him.
overall i do see the divergence from his current play and defense compared to last game, but it might be related to other things.
what do you think of bpd?
No, its more that Grammaton is being absolutely disingenuous and misrepresenting anything I said and then falsely accusing me of doing that to him. If you look carefully back on my exchange with him so far, he doesn't actually address anything about the fact his vote and tunneling on me immediately after BPD drops a literally bullshit post on the spot with zero evidence or proof to it, just a one-liner and fucks off from the thread.
Thinking I'm attributing this entirely to BPD isn't true I said simply it was 'possible' if they were aligned it comes off very suspicious how quickly he does that while BPD evacuates from the thread.
You claim this, I'm not under the impression I believe your saying this though.
Then you are being crystal-clear disingenuous. If you wanted to be analytical and playing to win as town, you'd be fully aware that BPD has a long history of making very bold flat-faced accusations without much proof behind them and zeroing in on a single post I made while lying about it being a delibarate attempt to "copy" my entrance from the last game should've been a red flag to you about him, not me.
This seems to be defensive on your part. Especially since I already exhaustively explained why its more suspicious your following in BPD's footsteps on something you know has zero tangible proof to operate as me being suspicious for not bothering with an initial rebuttal but I suspect you already know that and are just ignoring it.
Why wouldn't you?
I'm not unduly bothered by you advocating for my lynch, even as misguided as it is. I'm more annoyed you are intentionally misrepresenting my entire response to X, then having the absolute nerve to say I'm taking your words and misusing them when you started this with a strawman about me calling X scum when I said it could be scummy. I'm not going to be lynched today either way and I know what my slot is.
You need, and have failed several times now, to explain how my actions are "blatantly" scum.
Do you have anything to add besides being a worthless cheerleading commentator?Ya this . kinda emotional player. Not tactical
No, he has no case. Grammaton's entire pivot to me was based around BPD, therefore BPD is contingent to this. He hasn't acknowledge or refuted that X's post was worthless for quite awhile now, which is telling he really doesn't have much to go here on.his case is that instead of acknowledging bpd's one line or bullshit accusation properly you just called him a retard without putting any effort into it(in a similar vein to how you are now in response to gramma's case).