i dont think so, not the same team who one of them claims hider without visiting gram then claims serialIf he had a team, wouldn’t they tell him that?![]()
i dont think so, not the same team who one of them claims hider without visiting gram then claims serialIf he had a team, wouldn’t they tell him that?![]()
u trust xadlin? if so why
why wud lethal fake hiding behind gram when he didnt visit gram lolAlso why would Xadlin fake being blocked? Track a VT, say target went nowhere, easy money?
Huh?i dont think so, not the same team who one of them claims hider without visiting gram then claims serial
CP is a ws player, he wouldnt know about the "action failed"@Ekkologix how does your theory of the scum team being disorganized gel with your other take that CP is scum?
lethal claimed hider lolHuh?
CP is a ws player, he wouldnt know about the "action failed"
cp was not around when lethal/xadlin claimed. only gram/magic were
i have some reservations on gram as well regarding how he is handling xadlin now
Point takenwhy wud lethal fake hiding behind gram when he didnt visit gram lol
Well yeah lol
X-shot hider. Used on gram last night. After the stuff with fang and raem I wanted to be sure he was a good boy. I’m alive so he’s good, unless godfather.
asking me for a proof and telling nat there must be a 3rd blocker (which both ultimately work in favor of xadlin)Which is how, exactly?
asking me for a proof and telling nat there must be a 3rd blocker (which both ultimately work in favor of xadlin)
if xadlin was mafia u or tweet could be partners. im just grasping at some straws here but i may have got a big one
this flip is generally very informative. more so than nat's flip
There are two things which worry me:asking me for a proof and telling nat there must be a 3rd blocker (which both ultimately work in favor of xadlin)
if xadlin was mafia u or tweet could be partners. im just grasping at some straws here but i may have got a big one
this flip is generally very informative. more so than nat's flip
ok i gave u the proof, now what? do u deny it? do u justify xadlin's posts as not being what he said?I didn’t say there must be a third blocker, I said it’s essentially certain there will be a blocker
Asking you for proof being scum indicative is laughable, as is everything else you post
so where do u move from here?Point taken
ok i gave u the proof, now what? do u deny it? do u justify xadlin's posts as not being what he said?
being told that ratchet uses "action failed" by a player that u *town read*, against a player who u say that *you do not trust* does not carry weight?Deny what?