I don't follow this at all. I laid out my thought process on you, and the argument you're talking about originally had no involvement from me - I saw RDK was talking about one thing, and Achro was responding to another, as in they were talking past each other. So I explained what I thought RDK was saying (which he later confirmed was the case). And then you took that as if the point came from me - but crucially, once you found out that it wasn't me, but RDK, who made the original argument, you did nothing with it. You said "apply everything I said to you, to him", and then left the thread. And then you come back and repeat the very same sentiment that was already addressed as false.
Make it make sense pls.