Nope, we are talking about what you claimed was a slip. Don't get shy now.It was not because of the we word “just” though it did help, but that you quickly went from “mango is sus” to “mango is posting now and I like it, somewhat”.
“Just” can mean immediate past.It was earlier in the game, can't remember the post range.
Basically, because I used the word "just", he insisted I had "slipped" because I was referring to events from 1-2 hours prior, when if I was using the word "just", I should have only been referring to events from moments ago.
I pointed out that the word "just" can be used in different ways, and the context I used it in was to mean "exactly" and a means of couching the sentence (we are using informal language after all).
His response was to quote the google dictionary definition, full on copy and paste, including the "2" being visible to show that there were alternate ways to use the word.
In other words, he skipped the definition that applied to my usage, made it appear as if there were only one way to use the word, all to claim that I had slipped, when said slip doesn't even establish scum behaviour to begin with. A real gotcha, you like those no?
cant rly understand it much without seeing the post itself but doesn't seem importantIt was earlier in the game, can't remember the post range.
Basically, because I used the word "just", he insisted I had "slipped" because I was referring to events from 1-2 hours prior, when if I was using the word "just", I should have only been referring to events from moments ago.
I pointed out that the word "just" can be used in different ways, and the context I used it in was to mean "exactly" and a means of couching the sentence (we are using informal language after all).
His response was to quote the google dictionary definition, full on copy and paste, including the "2" being visible to show that there were alternate ways to use the word.
In other words, he skipped the definition that applied to my usage, made it appear as if there were only one way to use the word, all to claim that I had slipped, when said slip doesn't even establish scum behaviour to begin with. A real gotcha, you like those no?
you say you try to solve ekko, ratchet, and ultra but they're all "dangerous" null reads. what does that mean?
why mention the flower thing at all?
xeno town read seems okay I guess. the mango and fuji ones probably generous? mango seems a lot different than last game, idk why you would compare him to how he was in a dead chat. can you expand on the fuji read pls?
How quickly did it progress?Nope, we are talking about what you claimed was a slip. Don't get shy now.
I didn't progress all that quickly. In fact, my use of the word just being in error (according to you) was because I was referring to events from too long ago to be able to use the word "just" to refer to them, so now telling me it was all top quick is actually in contradiction to what you previously said.
Well he has engaged in mostly useless topics like always. I will say that his handling of my slot has been rather poor, and I feel like it's objectively manipulative in a way that can't just be dismissed as NAI AlwaysMind trolling, but everything outside of that has been par for the course. Which is to say, Null/Scum. Or as you would put it, "scum side of null".cant rly understand it much without seeing the post itself but doesn't seem important
whats ur read of him rn?
At least 2 hours over. More like 4, if I'm not mistaken.How quickly did it progress?
lmao i knew semantics were gonna be a problem“Just” can mean immediate past.
I thought Mango was making no sense with some of the stuff he said like pondering the meaning of Pein claiming when nobody can claim, and turning his Ratchet read around in a short time, but then he started to sound more townie. You deciding to go for Pein instead of Mango made me think you might have interpreted Mango's reaction the same way I did. Doubt Mango would bus Pein like that day 1 so probably not aligned scum, one or the other if any.
Like I’ve said, I’m no longer voting ratchet. I just saw an earlier interaction that I found interesting and wanted to dig deeperlmao i knew semantics were gonna be a problem
AM i like ya spunk my dude but you understand you're forcing your view of how you define its usage, yeah?
and it's so much harder to actually argue against the meaning of just precisely *because* of its many applications
i do this too so lemme help you out here
so you're asking the wrong question maybe.
the definition is irrelevant, you're gonna create pages of what someone meant using just.
do you feel their intent to use it was based on dishonesty? and why is it dishonest?
or you're just scum then w/e. you and mel have that commonality, you both latch onto specific details and wind up getting sussed for it. but if you're really gonna bark up the semantic tree, you're gonna have a hard time
or you're trolling
in which case gg no re
You've just flown completely under my radar so farNot going to lie this post from tweet registers as weird to me since I've taken strong positions on two players he's also expressed interest (He's voting Mango, and he's town reading Oneiros) and and he's factored none of that into his assessment.
No that was him but I've changed my mindthought u just said there was a post of oneiros u didn't like or seemed fake
or was that sm1 else
Translation?i could say the way i feel is blue like ten times until i hold my breath in anger and pass out
and you'd be yelling that i the way i feel is closer to turquoise actually
id just neck myself tbqh
You've just flown completely under my radar so far
whats gna be ur game plan ultraYou've seen enough of my posts to make an assessment. And between them they're the subject of most of my posts...so yup, still weird.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?