My brother in Christ, you are literally performing a double negative.
Memento Mori has shown no feats of it working as stated... so we should believe it works as stated?!
That's a literal NLF and you should know that's the case.
nigga are we spacebattles now??
That's literally not how "NLFs" work.
The statement of what it does isn't contradicted, so it does exactly as it is stated to do.
"This ability nullifies other abilities" is not the same as saying "this ability nullifies ALL abilities in fiction"
Like hell if I’m gonna argue any further when it comes to Fairy TailSo essentially Memento Mori has like no feats outside of hype statements.
Sounds like ass
Yes, that's absolutely how NLFs work...
No it didn't, it never demonstrated at all what it can do and all we got is a statement of what it can do. That's the absolute definition of a NLF as you are defining that it must work when it failed in it's only use, how it did so does not demonstrate otherwise as we have no idea how it would actually affect anyone.
My brother in Christ, you are basically saying that Memento Mori should be able to affect anyone when it affected no one in it's sole use...
The fact you can't understand that's a walking NLF is absolutely absurd.
It failed in it's only direct use against someone who could literally nullify the curse itself.
This doesn't support your point.
The attack that's stated to erase things would in fact erase people who haven't demonstrated the capability to withstand attacks that do just that.
That's how this works.
Take me what so long? That Nasuverse team going to win? I mean it didn't take me long, I immediately say it. Unless you mean you share this already and I say nothing? I didn't see it if you do, that's what
Yea I agree, as I said there, I believe most of the things here wins. Even if the team separated by class
But I am not entirely sure since idk how much stronger FT become, its still unclear to me. People seems to have completely different take on it.
Oh wait you mean what take me so long about R S? I'd still want to give benefit of the doubt they'd grow past their downplaying selfha It will go nowhere as I am sure you know, but might as well give them credit if they improve.
R S is saying that Cal is amped because Fergus said "Careless strike can destroy 3 hilltops" = "Caladbolg can only destroy 3 hilltops" and yes it is also because d'Eon saying "Caladbolg absorbing the magical energy as it spin" and he take both as "Caladbolg is getting amped! Because it can only destroy 3 hilltops and get magical energy." instead of it just being Caladbolg's natural ability like many other NP to absorb magical energy.
Yeah, this is failure in reading comprehension and misleading argument from his part.
It's stated to do a thing, and is not contradicted, so it can do the thing it is stated to do.
"Imagine Breaker nullifies powers" is not a NLF.
"Imagine Breaker can nullify any power it encounters" is a NLF.
"Mahoraga adapts to things" - is not a NLF.
"Mahoraga can adapt to anything" - is a NLF.
A "NLF" implies that I'm extrapolating beyond what is shown or stated.
And I'm not.
Its stated to do a thing and failed to do so the time it was used IIRC. I dont know if it was used any other times since I dont read fairy tail but yeah it sounds like its got nothing going for it EXCEPT statements.It's stated to do a thing, and is not contradicted, so it can do the thing it is stated to do.
You cant compare it to IB because IB has multiple, on top of multiple examples of how it works and shit"Imagine Breaker nullifies powers" is not a NLF.
"Imagine Breaker can nullify any power it encounters" is a NLF.
Same thing with Maho though not as many examples there are still examples"Mahoraga adapts to things" - is not a NLF.
"Mahoraga can adapt to anything" - is a NLF.
A NLF is assuming theres no maximum given a minumum.A "NLF" implies that I'm extrapolating beyond what is shown or stated.
And I'm not.
And an explanation was given: Demon Slayer Magic has the ability to nullify curses, such as Memento Mori.Its stated to do a thing and failed to do so the time it was used IIRC. I dont know if it was used any other times since I dont read fairy tail but yeah it sounds like its got nothing going for it EXCEPT statements.
and if statements were all you needed to prove ability then we would be going crazy with all kinds of shit
You cant compare it to IB because IB has multiple, on top of multiple examples of how it works and shit
Same thing with Maho though not as many examples there are still examples
A NLF is assuming theres no maximum given a minumum.
And then he died afterwards right? So other than that we dont know anything else about it besides 2 thingsAnd an explanation was given: Demon Slayer Magic has the ability to nullify curses, such as Memento Mori.
That's the only reason it didn't erase the one person it was used on.
Give you a couple"and if statements were all you needed to prove ability then we would be going crazy with all kinds of shit"
Like what though?
The difference for Iihiko/Solar is that, if I were talking about them I'd say "the former can nullify attacks by not recognizing them, and the latter manipulates energy"And then he died afterwards right? So other than that we dont know anything else about it besides 2 things
Statement: It erases people from existence
Feat: Doesnt work on people who can nullify curses
Thats all we got and its not much at all
Give you a couple
Solar the man of atom: "Everything is Energy therefore I can manipulate everything"
If all I needed was this with no backing then I could have him do whatever the fuck I wanted
Ihiko: "As long as he doesnt recognize it as an attack it wont work"
Guess I dont need to provide proof, Gokus Kamehameha does nothing to him
Kirby has infinite energy/power
The only thing we have for this is statements but fuck you if you think I'm gonna sit here and let people attempt to claim infinite power kirby
The difference for Iihiko/Solar is that, if I were talking about them I'd say "the former can nullify attacks by not recognizing them, and the latter manipulates energy"
And THEN the respective feats/statements besides those would be brought up
Saying the power does X is not the same thing as saying "it can do anything in regards to X"
and there's no other way to visibly demonstrate something as specific "removing the concept of life and death" from someone and erasing them from existence entirely
like
it either erases stuff from existence or it doesn't
it's a simple ass power to comprehend, no extrapolation needed
And they would still have feats to back up those statements and if they don't, we don't bring it up because it's featless... this isn't hard to grasp.
Yes it does because if all we have is a statement, then we have nothing to back up that statement and we are stuck with how far does it go, who does it affect and so on and so forth.
And don't give me "Zeref wouldn't be affected" because Memento Mori wasn't used on him, he just deemed Tartoros a failure at random and killed Mard and the Book they all came from, that's not a feat either.
Okay so by that logic, Mard Geer's Memento Mori can kill Accelerator right? As well as Aleister Crowley and those on the same wavelength? There's no proof it can do it and nothing at all saying it cannot either right? Because it either erases stuff from existence or it doesn't right?
I mean wow, I didn't realize it can kill beings like IIhiko to ORT to the Demi-Fiend with that logic.
Nah see, I said statements only. If there were not feats if we took statements as the only thing, Which is what this Memento Mori shit has for the most part, shit would just boil down to "are you faster?" otherwise GG you lose no debate needed, dont need feats.The difference for Iihiko/Solar is that, if I were talking about them I'd say "the former can nullify attacks by not recognizing them, and the latter manipulates energy"
And THEN the respective feats/statements besides those would be brought up
I mean Zeno has shown how he deletes shit from existence, Beerus too with Hakai so this is just wrong.Saying the power does X is not the same thing as saying "it can do anything in regards to X"
and there's no other way to visibly demonstrate something as specific "removing the concept of life and death" from someone and erasing them from existence entirely
I havent seen a single person get vaporized and then someone go "Yeah i wiped you from existence"because even vaporization from a strong attack can appear to do so to the naked eye
Again it needs the feats still. Just a statement wont work.like
it either erases stuff from existence or it doesn't
it's a simple ass power to comprehend, no extrapolation needed
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?