How in the hell can someone be omniversal +Thanks I now have an aneurysm reading DC of "At least Omniversal+"
Seriously fuck everyone involved in that stupidity
I don’t see Goku in that listUnless someone went around changing shit the only people that had it were TOAA, The Presence and MoM
I wish I was joking but Elaine Belloc and Presence pages had Omniversal+ on them before I dropped bothHow in the hell can someone be omniversal +
Okay dropped as well, if Bern has an issue with the Umineko pagesovervoid I think also had omni+ on it
we literal did have all of those
im pretty sure Umineko still has it and a win over CAS and Mandrakk on the wiki lmao
people were going crazy with omniversal shit
Jakk was saying Genis could channel the power of TOAA
What the fuck were people smoking
I brought up our fading standards a lot but thats fucking ridiculous
Aight who tf let Bern edit the umineko profiles
Man for a moment I thought you were saying Overlord specifically and I was about to lose itovervoid I think also had omni+ on it
Genis had the most outrageous stats of all bruh, you don't remember them omniversal cajun fries?We didn't have Lucifer at omniversal, nor Michael, definitely not fucking Umineko characters lmfao and def not fucking Genis. At most you gave him megaversal
Unless someone went around changing shit the only people that had it were TOAA, The Presence and MoM
Yeah just being called a universe wouldn't be enough, it needs to be something comparable to what our standard of a universe is, which would be our own universe. Some sort of information supplied somewhere that's more than just "its a universe"So destroying something called a universe isn't universe level unless there additional is proof that thing is universe-sized? What kind of proof are we talking about here? Most fictions won't specify what the radius of the universe is, so I don't think we can expect that.
We cant assume a dimension is universe sized just because it mirrors the real world as that dimension can be localized to a planet and still mirror the real world.Why not? If something is supposed to have real life cosmology destroying it would be universe level, no?
Well obviously Isekais would be their own universeActually, we wouldn't, as Kaguya's dimension isn't a populated main dimension. I was thinking of stuff like Isekai worlds or so that have proven to have planets orbiting suns and stuff.
Well yeah destroying a concept would rank higher than just destroying a physical space. Destroying just a universe would obviously be universal but destroying it and its timeline would easily put you higherWhy would time be relevant, though? Never took us to rank timeline destruction higher than universe destruction like VSB.
I mean that's the whole point of this thread, to get this classified properly. I was hoping the other people in this thread would comment on this part when i said it, but they kinda didntAnd in our prior debate we didn't really require infinite universe to be shown. Why make it a requirement now?
I get you, though even if they were in other multiverses, destroying the 2 universes from each one would still only make you multiversal but with a fuck off huge range.Yeah, at the same time goes without saying. When I say same set, I mean that the universes don't lie in different multiverses. Just that a term like set/group works better, as many fictions don't explicitly call it different multiverses.
Yeah but writing it out that way may come across as confusing to some people. Its best to keep stuff simple but defined so no one can play dumb or semantics with itThat's what I wrote. Just that using the word "Multiverse" in the definition would require us to first define what a Multiverse is. And a Multiverse is a set/group/collection of universes, so....
I don't really get this. Space and time are connected. That's why blackholes can bend time. If your destroying the universe you would be destroying space and thus time.Well yeah destroying a concept would rank higher than just destroying a physical space. Destroying just a universe would obviously be universal but destroying it and its timeline would easily put you higher
No destroying the universe doesn't suddenly delete the concepts of space and time.I don't really get this. Space and time are connected. That's why blackholes can bend time. If your destroying the universe you would be destroying space and thus time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?