You don't actually believe this lol, dross.
You don't actually believe this lol, dross.my point is aurelian has been much more engaged than you, not that u arent engaging others
Well, yeah I guess, I can't really help that because it means were coming from completely different perspectives. Fwiw, I don't have any defence of Sparkles via her play, so I don't completely hold it against you for pushing it.I get your point but I don't really put as much stock into it as you do. I mean his capacity to be aggressively wrong is a large part of why I'm not scum reading him, so the premise that he is never wrong about sparkles as town, while sound, is not something I care about over my own considerations.
I mean sparkles has absolutely nothing going for her, complete ass
Like come on, COME ON. It's just gas lighting, by what possible metric has Aurelian been more engaged with this game than I have?You don't actually believe this lol, dross.
Well, he was earlier on. It's when I gave him my town read (in my mind). He changed up since ig but I don't think in a scummy way so I'll still keep my read on him there.What nonchalance lmao
not rlyI wasnt claiming when Ultra did because I still wanted scum to waste shit on me but 4 is a lot lol.
this is a bad get back attempt fang, too many inaccuraciesI'm scum for claiming when you've taken a eunuch style position of giving no real input between Ultra and Poyser, sniping from the sidelines, and then getting the audacity to call me scum when I'm the lead wagon? Get your head out of your ass.
I checked Melkors games and they had 3 vanilla claims or 4 for bigger games. This is an 18 player game and I think 4 is a lot, I hope there isnt more vanilla lol. Well if there are now they know there are 4 vanilla claims. Sparkles, Ultra, Aurelian and me.
Between this and the earlier one where he said I was dodging T-Pein's question, some of Ekko's posts towards me have been COMPLETE SHIT.Like come on, COME ON. It's just gas lighting, by what possible metric has Aurelian been more engaged with this game than I have?
its more of me having concern about ur play than defending aurelian, i dont know how u took it as such. i legit think fang is playing better than u which is pretty tellingI'm feeling Ekko. Don't like his defence if Aurelian at all because all he's done is try to marry his play to other slots (why him and not them). Beyond that, I want claims from the low posters and PoE. If Aurelian flips Town then I don't know, I'd have to re-read and see. Would probably defer.
aurelian and gad? I'm downCan we all agree to just lynch one and vig the other
YawnI'm asking you to answer a question like a normal human being and offer a plausible explanation for what would be kind of offensively transparent. Seems like a dumb assumption from you, and instead of defending it, you're posturing about it.
Tempest is basically doing the same thing but he's better than you so I'm just kinda chalking him up as scum, but I'd like to see you try a bit harder than this
this is all time bullshitter stuff lmao, no notes whatsoeverits more of me having concern about ur play than defending aurelian, i dont know how u took it as such. i legit think fang is playing better than u which is pretty telling
Whatever you say buddythis is a bad get back attempt fang, too many inaccuracies
Lynch Sparkles and vig you? Sounds like a plan.aurelian and gad? I'm down
yes hes not infallibleSo, the thing with Sparkles is that I have not yet seen Poyser read her wrong. So his read has a lot of value to me. And I think, as town or scum, he has an obligation to read her right. So my position woukd be that for Sparkles to be scum here, Poyser's chances of being scum go up drastically. And I guess this is a problem I have with you, because you aren't really treating Poyser like you think he's likely scum. So I have to ask, you think he would be confidently wrong on Sparkles as town?
Yeah I don't buy this one bit. Early game you had me as obvious town, now I know you've been walking that read back but at the very least, it means you've seen things from my slot that you think are townie. Now you act like I've played shit based on... I'm not sure actually, you've even called me frozen when I have over 100 posts in the thread. It's just complete dreck.its more of me having concern about ur play than defending aurelian, i dont know how u took it as such. i legit think fang is playing better than u which is pretty telling
You can't just dismiss it as "he can be wrong". Maybe so, but until I see it I will trust his read. And I've outlined the considerations that come with not trusting his motivations. You gonna address that any time soon, or just snipe?yes hes not infallible
also cud easily see posyer as scum
scum aurelian never claimed for u either iirc, think ur overselling this point tbh. its closer to NAI id say, probably a mood reliant than alignment reliant thingTown Aurelian would tell me that he would never claim for me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?