• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked EastEnders Mafia

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm saying the opposite - you didn't mean to quote me, it was something you just said subconsciously that just happened to be my observation. You reached for something in your brain to shade Ekko and that's what you found.
Oh like that. Yea I don’t agree but if that’s your perception then so be it
 
Oh right you guys hinted masons

are you saying you’re character and alignment confirmed to each other?
 
Wait hang on

you said you had tweet Town initially until he gave up too easily, and yet you think my reason for reading him town was horse shit and ultra’s reason for reading him scum made more sense. So why were you reading him town?
 
BTW I’m off for a work meeting so don’t expect much from me in the coming hours

Meanwhile vote Gramma
 
can u reply to my question above about which reads of mine u agree/disagree with? and why for each one

what u've been doing is just unqualified shade. let's get u on the spotlight a bit
 
Because you came in with 30 minutes left, you could posture as much as you wanted but it was unlikely to change the lynch from your pov
does it matter how long i have been in the thread to make a read on someone???
 
i am sorry i didnt know i had to be here since day 1 posting 1000 posts to read someone town or scum
 
No I don’t. At all. There was literally nothing wrong with my reasoning at all lmao
I've heard enough.

Vote: Poyser

Bonus questions for the room:
1 - Why does Poyser apologise to Ultra in the post where he rescinds his Town read of Tweet if his reasoning now had no issue with it?
2 - Why did other players besides myself take exception with his reasoning, and if I'm not mistaken here, most notably Tweet himself?

I think Poyser is very transparently bloviating in his arguments - he dismisses points against him as stupid and nonsensical and tries to posit that there is no justifiable reason for the conclusions made to have been made. In spite of this, he continues to conflate the arguments themselves - when his reasoning is discussed, he makes it about the conclusion of the read for example. I feel like I've given more than enough opportunity here for him to show some form of a logical thought process - it is entirely absent.
 
why do u scum read ratchet?
 
Also you can repeat I’m lacking analysis as much as you want lmao it’s not gonna make it true, the thread is literally full of it
u scum read me for making a read on tweet an hour to 30 min before deadline and asking for a case. there 0 analysis behind this m8
 
Wait hang on

you said you had tweet Town initially until he gave up too easily, and yet you think my reason for reading him town was horse shit and ultra’s reason for reading him scum made more sense. So why were you reading him town?
I don't recall reading him town. Can you pull that up please?

Yesterday, I questioned why Tweet as Scum would claim Tree Stump. I believe it was you who provided a perfectly plausible and agreeable counter to that, which I duly retired, and then insisted he was firmly Null. I suppose you can argue that me saying "I don't know why scum tweet claims stump" is town reading him, but you were fully aware of this position I held, and you were fully aware of my resulting progression, so you trying to present it as a contradiction now is outright disingenuous.
 
bolded is a type of read that comes more from TMI PoV

for poyser tho ive seen him do these kind of reads as town before when he reads lethal doddsy tpein or psychic for some weird reasons in previous games so i wouldn't say its a damning point

why is he that aggressive towards me when he himself used to read tweet town at certain point

also the posts u brought probably tells me poyser/ultra arent a team
 
I'm struggling to find the post where I said I think he gave up which looked bad on him, but I did find the post where I mentioned his stump claim was my (singular) reservation.
 
As stated^
 
The problem I was having was his claim made more sense to me coming from town, with that more or less addressed I have nothing to defend him with. This is a long way of saying "null, but the flip is informative in regards to you & rugrat to me".
This post was directly towards Poyser, he read it and responded to it. In other words, he has no excuse to make this post:
Wait hang on

you said you had tweet Town initially until he gave up too easily, and yet you think my reason for reading him town was horse shit and ultra’s reason for reading him scum made more sense. So why were you reading him town?
I rest my case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.