Oh like that. Yea I don’t agree but if that’s your perception then so be itI'm saying the opposite - you didn't mean to quote me, it was something you just said subconsciously that just happened to be my observation. You reached for something in your brain to shade Ekko and that's what you found.
WhyOh and woof woof woof
I do require an answer to this. Should be an easy yes or no.Do you see no way for someone to, within reason, see your progression on Tweet and feel like your initial town read caught you negative attention?
No I don’t. At all. There was literally nothing wrong with my reasoning at all lmaoI do require an answer to this. Should be an easy yes or no.
can u reply to my question above about which reads of mine u agree/disagree with? and why for each oneI see where You’re coming from, I think, in that I use supposedly town behavior to accuse Ekko, but in this case what’s bothering me is that he’s leaning so much into it without any merit. Almost as if he saw some people questioning his absence and him wanting to make up ground
does it matter how long i have been in the thread to make a read on someone???Because you came in with 30 minutes left, you could posture as much as you wanted but it was unlikely to change the lynch from your pov
I've heard enough.No I don’t. At all. There was literally nothing wrong with my reasoning at all lmao
why do u scum read ratchet???
I was defending someone being pushed, of course it’s going to be questioned… are you trying to say that would have surprised me, or that I’d be worried/scared of it? Because if so then why choose to defend him in the first place? And surely flipping my read on its head would just lead to more intense questioning?
u scum read me for making a read on tweet an hour to 30 min before deadline and asking for a case. there 0 analysis behind this m8Also you can repeat I’m lacking analysis as much as you want lmao it’s not gonna make it true, the thread is literally full of it
I don't recall reading him town. Can you pull that up please?Wait hang on
you said you had tweet Town initially until he gave up too easily, and yet you think my reason for reading him town was horse shit and ultra’s reason for reading him scum made more sense. So why were you reading him town?
bolded is a type of read that comes more from TMI PoV@Ekkologix
In short:
>Reads Tweet town without elaboration.
>Eventually says Tweet is town because he doubled down on suspecting X, because X was widely town read at that point in the thread. Dismisses the idea that scum wouldn't want to overextend, essentially.
>Gets called out for this, and then immediately retracts his read because of how tweet handled Alco (who had nowhere near as universal a read from anyone) which meant he was using an unrelated point to move himself positionally and dismiss his earlier reasoning.
It's easily his worst play of the game, and hard to reconcile as town. Appealing to WIFOM has been his main defence today, that and to dismiss arguments against him as "shite" without putting the work in to discredit them.
As stated^The reservation I have with Tweet here is - why as scum does he claim stump? I understand that this is approaching WIFOM, but with Xenos on the table I feel like basically anything but "lynching me is fine" would be strong enough a claim to at least dissuade some people from wanting his flip, but he chose the one claim that actually invites it. I don't believe this has been given due consideration - it was just tabled and then dismissed.
This post was directly towards Poyser, he read it and responded to it. In other words, he has no excuse to make this post:The problem I was having was his claim made more sense to me coming from town, with that more or less addressed I have nothing to defend him with. This is a long way of saying "null, but the flip is informative in regards to you & rugrat to me".
I rest my case.Wait hang on
you said you had tweet Town initially until he gave up too easily, and yet you think my reason for reading him town was horse shit and ultra’s reason for reading him scum made more sense. So why were you reading him town?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?