If we were to assume you’re an indie, all the indie choices are pretty bad.
Yup, why would a non-hostile indie be bulletproof AND have investigative abilities? Makese zero sense.
Just the air. Why do you not want to lynch Prof, who was literally busdriven with a townie, for Kobe?
You stop, clearly you’re manipulative
And that makes me a lynch candidate today... why, exactly? Again I hard claim not game ending, so if you think I'm Indie (and I'm not hard claiming that) then if I'm Zeref I'm breaking that whole "I don't lie as Indie" thing. At the end of the day Nat, I self-resolve, if I haven't proven something by day 5 then by all means revisit it.
in the d1 WU it said there was an indie looking for something, maybe that's Ratchet and would explain his investigation?
Well I’m 3-0 on scum so I’ve done something right lol.
I'm giving Prof a compromise. It's not a hard result on him, after all, and he is willing to work with me. Or would you expect me to work with someone trying to lynch me?
I am not saying you are one, I’m just showing you the issue about all your claims which are a little nuts at this point.
I'm hunting scum, Nat. Based on how Prof came forward to help out Ratchet while completely ignoring the claim aspect, it becomes more probable that Ratchet and Prof are teammates. Prof is saying that he killed Ruffles, who flipped town, without any justification.You stop, clearly you’re manipulative
I mean if I win before day 5 and everyone loses then you can flame Ekko - it's not the case.I am not saying you are one, I’m just showing you the issue about all your claims which are a little nuts at this point.
By day 5, is there even a town left
Why does my teammate Ratchet come out with something that can be used to incriminate me for no reason and ask me to claim lol
It’s more likely they are soulmates.
See, this is the kind of post that seals it for me. If we're teammates, then I obviously have no reason to extract a claim and essentially have him as a lynch candidate out of hand after he has a pretty good record in the thread in terms of getting scum. It seems pretty obvious to me that your arguments are changing to suit the narrative you wish to push.
Indeed, very manipulative
I said "probable". There is a case for you to be the vig but your hard defense on Ratchet without questioning his alignment suggests that you are coasting, rather than hunting scum. I give you more credit than that as a player.
Your argument that it's "probable" is the issue given that you've failed to give the obvious due consideration to reach this point. Which is of course, if we're team mates I've ruined his game for relatively little gain. I'm more or less willing to put the nail into this coffin, I think you're transparently scum.
It is not really. As I have told you before, my case on you has nothing to do with Prof. It is you who are now shifting the narrative that your stance on Prof and his view of you clears you somehow.
