• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Unranked Archived Fairy Tail Mafia - The Dawn of Fiore [Main Game Thread] (Game Ended - Zeref Dragneel and Acnologia have won the game)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Literally:

>JW: I don't think you would put this much effort into making people think you play the same as town and scum as Town.
>Me: I haven't really put much effort into that though?
>JW: If this isn't you putting in effort, then you putting in effort must be scary.
>Me: Uh, what?
>JW: When I talk about the effort you've put in, I'm speaking generally.
>Me: That's not what you originally said.
>JW: Your reading comprehension fails.

Like come on now.

As if I double check my past posts to make everything I say perfectly align with stuff I've said previously.... And it's not like everything I say is one continously connected idea thread. I'm thinking about multiple things at the same time.
 
You misinterpreting what I meant is what happened. I didn't say you were ever lacking in investment as Town in a general capacity. I meant in specific instances of being overly pedantic, Which I believe is something you lean in on slightly more as scum.
...You very clearly made the argument that you were speaking generally, which you defended, and then doubled down in defending prior to this. My alleged pedantry here comes from an argument where semantics were absolutely required, and your original point had nothing to do with pedantry anyway.
sure thing mr. formal debate man
The bread and butter of Mafia is identifying, and employing, fallacies. Dismissed.
 
As if I double check my past posts to make everything I say perfectly align with stuff I've said previously.... And it's not like everything I say is one continously connected idea thread. I'm thinking about multiple things at the same time.
That doesn't defend trying to pass the buck off to me for you contradicting your statements.
 
..You very clearly made the argument that you were speaking generally, which you defended, and then doubled down in defending prior to this. My alleged pedantry here comes from an argument where semantics were absolutely required, and your original point had nothing to do with pedantry anyway.

Bruh... The post comparing your your likelihood of enganging in that activity as Town was not what I meant by the "in general" statement
that statement was purely regarding the post I made about what you putting in even more effort would look like.
 
I haven't had the opportunity to really play that much before that point, so I'm trying to make up for that now. But there's just loose ends everywhere right now
 
Bruh... The post comparing your your likelihood of enganging in that activity as Town was not what I meant by the "in general" statement
that statement was purely regarding the post I made about what you putting in even more effort would look like.
This doesn't fly - I questioned your switch to "general" from your original stance, and you bucked down on "general". You even used your "general" statement to defend the issues I had with your original statement, by all means feel free to reconcile this.
 
This doesn't fly - I questioned your switch to "general" from your original stance, and you bucked down on "general". You even used your "general" statement to defend the issues I had with your original statement, by all means feel free to reconcile this.

I never switched my stance to begin with, this is merely something you believe happened cause you misinterpeted what I said
But sure dig down on this, I can keep going all day.
 
@Black Pegged Dragon I want you to read over my discussion with John Wayne today and let me know your thoughts on it.
I've read over it at about seventy percent strength. I do see where JW is coming from with his points, I just don't know if they have much validity or strength to stand on. I don't think it's a terrible way of trying to solve your slot to start, so I don't think you saying solving by tone is useless. I do understand he maybe changed his goal a little bit throughout his interaction with you. I don't really feel like it's necessarily wolf motivated. I also think that if he's a wolf and legit thinks you're a wolf, there are probably ways to start his game as opposed to going after you. I think your defense has been fine and there isn't really pingy in your responses to him. Being aware of your skill and this being a multiball, this does feel like town versus town with the energy and focus I was able to give your interaction.
 
I never switched my stance to begin with, this is merely something you believe happened cause you misinterpeted what I said
But sure dig down on this, I can keep going all day.
I don't need to do this all day - the evidence supporting my argument is in the thread. I'm more interested in how Prof, who is typically inclined towards logic, liked the points you've made. I think that's pretty egregious on his part.
 

Day 1 - Vote Count 6 (Up to post #1036)


Votes:
Kobe ->
Ultra > Magic
Magic -> Kobe > Sworder > Prof > TAT
BPD -> Flower > Sworder > Flower > Kobe
Ratchet -> Sworder > Xadlin > Kobe > Xadlin
Sworder -> BPD
Aurelian -> Sworder
Tpein -> Sworder > Unvote
OLU -> Flower > Unvote > Hime
Flower -> Prof > Unvote > Voldemort > Kobe > Unvote > Ratchet
Mango -> Sworder > Ruffles > Xadlin
Xadlin -> Sworder > Unvote
Hayumi -> Prof > Kobe
TAT -> Sworder
RDK -> Xadlin
JW -> Sworder > Ratchet
Tweet -> TAT
Hime -> Kobe
Prof -> TAT
Melkor -> Xadlin

Count:
Xadlin = 4
(RDK, Melkor, Ratchet, Mango)
Kobe = 3 (Hayumi, BPD, Hime)
TAT = 3 (Magic, Tweet, Prof)
Sworder = 2 (Aurelian, TAT)
Ratchet = 2 (JW, Flower)

Hime = 1 (OLU)
Magic = 1 (Kobe)
BPD = 1 (Sworder)

Not Voting: Xadlin, Tpein, Psychic, Gad, RAEM, Ruffles, Poison, Juliet, Natalija



Please let me know if I made any mistakes.
Votes displayed may not reflect the actual vote count in play.


A little more than 5 hours are left for Day 1 and Magic Game 1 (Part 2)
Day 1 ends in - Countdown


An extension can be granted for Day 1 and Part 2 due to the ~4 hours missed before the game start.
Message me in role PM if you want to vote for a 4 hr extension for Day 1 and Game 1 - Part 2.

Need majority votes for the extension.

does the tags even work?
 
Last edited:

Day 1 - Vote Count 6 (Up to post #1036)


Votes:
Kobe ->
Ultra > Magic
Magic -> Kobe > Sworder > Prof > TAT
BPD -> Flower > Sworder > Flower > Kobe
Ratchet -> Sworder > Xadlin > Kobe > Xadlin
Sworder -> BPD
Aurelian -> Sworder
Tpein -> Sworder > Unvote
OLU -> Flower > Unvote > Hime
Flower -> Prof > Unvote > Voldemort > Kobe > Unvote > Ratchet
Mango -> Sworder > Ruffles > Xadlin
Xadlin -> Sworder > Unvote
Hayumi -> Prof > Kobe
TAT -> Sworder
RDK -> Xadlin
JW -> Sworder > Ratchet
Tweet -> TAT
Hime -> Kobe
Prof -> TAT
Melkor -> Xadlin

Count:
Xadlin = 4
(RDK, Melkor, Ratchet, Mango)
Kobe = 3 (Hayumi, BPD, Hime)
TAT = 3 (Magic, Tweet, Prof)
Sworder = 2 (Aurelian, TAT)
Ratchet = 2 (JW, Flower)

Hime = 1 (OLU)
Magic = 1 (Kobe)
BPD = 1 (Sworder)

Not Voting: Xadlin, Psychic, Gad, RAEM, Ruffles, Poison, Juliet, Natalija



Please let me know if I made any mistakes.
Votes displayed may not reflect the actual vote count in play.


A little more than 5 hours are left for Day 1 and Magic Game 1 (Part 2)
Day 1 ends in - Countdown


An extension can be granted for Day 1 and Part 2 due to the ~4 hours missed before the game start.
Message me in role PM if you want to vote for a 4 hr extension for Day 1 and Game 1 - Part 2.

Need majority votes for the extension.

does the tags even work?
remaining tags since only first 20 work i belive

20. @Juliet
21. @John Wayne
22. @Natalija
23. @Ratchet
24. @hime
25. @TAT
26. @Flower
 
I'd like to say that even if Flower did that supposed Truth Tell of hers, her play since as well as her just following my vote on Ratchet do feel a bit like Pocketing.
 
I don't need to do this all day - the evidence supporting my argument is in the thread. I'm more interested in how Prof, who is typically inclined towards logic, liked the points you've made. I think that's pretty egregious on his part.

I mean I'm not exactly Town reading Prof lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top