this was 4 hours left until eod.
you also called him out as scummy earlier then left him as null despite explaining why you felt he was shady.
this was 4 hours left until eod.If Watson doesn't appear I may turn my vote in Dofla's direction.
He would bother to do it if he and Ekko agreed upon it.pein's almost sole contribution was doing nothing then voting ekko. if they were scummates i dont see that as something he'd bother to do.
which arguments? my argument with fang was less than a page and hardly prolonged. i didnt say my argument with him would help me get a better read on him, i said my argument with him would make him more readable. he does better in interactions. i actually said the opposite about it helping me read him as it tends to, or has recently at least, caused me to be prone to error in how i read people(flower in 2 games, ekko/tpein in melkor's game off the top of my head).
also who are your town reads?
^this.Luka : Town leaning. Also very cringe. If he's not a powerole, I do not oppose if the scums want to kill him. 230 posts at the moment I'm writting this. Stop him, please.
Ekko : A bit weird slot. He's active and implicated but I cannot figure out if he's really trying to solve or if there is something other, but strange feeling from him. Null.
Poyser : It's the first time we play together iirc. He's sweetly caressing my c*ck. I like how he's playing. I just hope he doesn't jump from nicely touching my weewee to crush my balls.
Magic : It seems he's trying but most of his posts are reactions to other posts. I would like him to make clear reads because I have the impression that he's on all front but has no clear direction or theory. Slightly town leaning.
Craig : He's playing agressive but in a manner I appreciate. He's asking questions and doesn't give a fuck of who is his opponent. I hope he still plays like this. Town leaning.
Ultra : I'm not sure why, maybe because he was supposed to have a hiatus before registering this game, he seems less energetic than before and more fixated on some debates. Excepted during the Avatar game on WG, I really didn't have the opportunity to appreciate his scum play so I don't if he's going to turn scum or not. In the Avatar game, he subbed at endgame and in the Hell's Paradise game, he was lynched Day 1. He's still trying to be question people. Slightly town leaning.
Gad : How am I supposed to read this guy? He seems to have no logic. But yet, I do not feel the falsely dumb thing I felt during last game. Null.
Aurelian : The same Aurelian as usual. It looks like he wants to kill everybody here, nothing unusual. Not the same Aurellian staying in the shadow of wagon to push chaos in the battlefield like it was the case during the All of Us are Dead game. Town leaning.
The Orca : I feel like he's posting a bit without conviction. Godfather+strongman+janitor.
Kweh : I like his posts. He's priorizing quality over quantity. His reactions seem genuine. Also he's annoyed by Luka's never ending posts for the reason it blurs his reading comprehension of the game. I feel like he's not the only one who's like him. Town leaning.
Ratchet : I really don't know what to think of Ratchet. Like most of the time, he comes and leaved, again and again. He seems a bit colder than while the previous games. Null.
Polar Bear : Are you indie? PB seems not agressive. He's like the start of the previous game, calm. I quite like it. Or maybe because the two last time he went for me as scum he was lynched Day 1 he might be scared.
Retro : She seems more defensive and acts like a third party. I'm not sure I like it but I would rather wait and observe a bit more to have my conclusion on this slot. Null.
Dofla : My only scum read. Very opportunistic. I have the exact same feeling I had during the All of Us are Dead game. He's also talking about sparing Ekko on who I have a weird feeling. Scum leaning.
For the guys who didn't get a read, talk more.
Dofla is my only scum read. I'll give more scum reads probably after this dayphase when I make my conclusion from the lynch flip.
Sorry I made a mistake on the name at the end.this was 4 hours left until eod.
you also called him out as scummy earlier then left him as null despite explaining why you felt he was shady.
This is how I caught gad a few games ago so I like it as town solving thought processyoure really not giving any reads, mostly just comments.
everything also goes towards the null direction for you, even your responses to other people's reads such as poyser's here about watson.
I did not outright vig them. If I did, I would've said I did. I also do not know for a fact that I preformed the kill, I just have it as a large possibility.@Luka
Can you just confirm outright you vigged Dofla
Don't see the point in being coy if you already outted you have a kill
^and thisThere are a lot people voting Ekko I think, maybe too much, who among these people do not have an other scum read?
^this.
also you had dofla as scum, not null.
On Ekko*
Sorry I made a mistake on the name at the end.
do you not think a long back and forth with aurelian makes him more readable?
^is what i said.But you said it was clear he was town after his first few replies. If there's no argument then how will you achieve a town read of him?
I'm not exactly pushing the idea that his logic is flawed and therefore he's scum, but seeing as you didn't read the exchange you wouldn't really know that I suppose!
I meant to ask you what you meant by this, btwgo on mr alco
I think you're arguing in circles here - you suggested a long back and forth makes him more readable, ergo the point of the long back and forth was to get a better read of him. You're objecting to the latter statement while admitting the former.^is what i said.
i didnt say it was a way for me to read him better and at the start of the argument i said as much, but aurelian is easiest to read when in an argument/clash/etc.
what did you mean it was pretty in character for him?I meant to ask you what you meant by this, btw
Horrific he says!You can believe what you want. Still a horrific shot if from a vig
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?