Penguini
The Best Dog
it must be hard, when you don't remember making comments - but pro players have receipts
- Status
Polar Bear
G.O.A.T
I'm here and not one player has a receipt of anything. Especially you
Penguini
The Best Dog
the bolded is a contingent statement
Polar Bear
G.O.A.T
So replace you with RDK, it changes nothing at all in the statement
Polar Bear
G.O.A.T
That was before mass claims.
Polar Bear
G.O.A.T
Put me up to 7 and ill hammer myself
Polar Bear
G.O.A.T
I now know why town loses so much lol
The Orca
Antihero
So im just going to zone out and talk to myself
Orca 1: What would scum likely do in a mass claim to appear as town as possible
Orca 2: Fuck off you troll
Orca 1: Already ahead of you
Orca 2: Da fuck is wrong with you
Orca 3: Fine ill play along, scum most likely wants to claim something that can't be counterclaimed, makes sense, backed up by info but can't be disproved, go under the radar, claim something everyone can
Orca 1: Well let's look at the mass claim
Retro claimed something that while doesn't look good, doesnt make sense to do so as scum. It went somewhat against Orca's who she would know is town, had a bad look on the moves, and could be used to tie her to a role block maybe
Polar made it known he wasn't claiming to get voted and then claimed something that conflicted with Whicker (getting to him). As scum that's just doubling and tripling down on bad play, just why would someone do this also making it almost wanting a 1V1 for the lynch
Whicker: claimed quickly, had a clean and precise claim, backed up by maybe dead people only, jumped on Polar's claim
One guy: VT
Tweet: VT
BB: VT
Sky: BP
Sigismund: missing in action still but around enough to participate
I'm sure I've missed some off hand or mixed something up, but seriously I think you all are going about this in the wrong manner
On the claims alone id say
BB, Sigismund, and Whicker have the red flags
Orca 1: What would scum likely do in a mass claim to appear as town as possible
Orca 2: Fuck off you troll
Orca 1: Already ahead of you
Orca 2: Da fuck is wrong with you
Orca 3: Fine ill play along, scum most likely wants to claim something that can't be counterclaimed, makes sense, backed up by info but can't be disproved, go under the radar, claim something everyone can
Orca 1: Well let's look at the mass claim
Retro claimed something that while doesn't look good, doesnt make sense to do so as scum. It went somewhat against Orca's who she would know is town, had a bad look on the moves, and could be used to tie her to a role block maybe
Polar made it known he wasn't claiming to get voted and then claimed something that conflicted with Whicker (getting to him). As scum that's just doubling and tripling down on bad play, just why would someone do this also making it almost wanting a 1V1 for the lynch
Whicker: claimed quickly, had a clean and precise claim, backed up by maybe dead people only, jumped on Polar's claim
One guy: VT
Tweet: VT
BB: VT
Sky: BP
Sigismund: missing in action still but around enough to participate
I'm sure I've missed some off hand or mixed something up, but seriously I think you all are going about this in the wrong manner
On the claims alone id say
BB, Sigismund, and Whicker have the red flags
Polar Bear
G.O.A.T
BalsamicBear
Whicker
Hans Tweetenberg
Sigismund
Big Man/Bachi
Retrolize
CraigPelton
RDK
Oneiros
The Orca
Sky
Psychic
Grammaton
Polar Bear
Whicker
Hans Tweetenberg
Sigismund
Big Man/Bachi
Retrolize
CraigPelton
RDK
Oneiros
The Orca
Sky
Psychic
Grammaton
Polar Bear
Polar Bear
G.O.A.T
Did I do it lol.
Need me to?
Sky
So unreliable.
- Pronouns
- She/Her
What the fuck is the first half of this post
Sky
So unreliable.
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Would have been waaaaay better for you if you'd taken this position for Lethal btw
- Status