scum side of nullWhat do you think about Ratchet?
Gramma I believe. Or Poyser. Somebody brought that up in the DN game.Who told you that
well it shows u im not very confident. its a weak readthe fact you’re using ‘idk’ in your justification should be a clue that you’re building on sand
Tbh I didn't get the impression that they were light hearted at all. I was just curious what this was all about.scum side of null
our interaction ended. i thought his early posts to me where he votes me and says he has a day kill were forced. he is saying they were meant to be light hearted. which one do u think they were?
both you and gram said it feels off but didn't specify what feels off
I think you haven't understood my position at all. I said I was otherwise leaning town, but the way this transpired gave me pause for concern. None of this was presented as a "strong prior", particularly after being informed by T-Pein that Masons not being told of each other's player names is a normal convention for the host. If you were really paying attention, you'd know that it was that extra anonymity that led me along to the idea that the mason pairing was scum/town, and with that mostly shelved, I have no reason to hold onto that belief.I have one concern about your progression right now - earlier you seem to hold as a strong prior that masons in this game probably implied a scum pairing, and that's why you were scum leaning Flower.
The problem is that I would expect you, if you believed this sincerely, to want to get the other mason claim regardless of your read on Flower, because a 50/50 shot is a pretty good trade off. You have not done this.
well it shows u im not very confident. its a weak read
You didn't think me saying I was about to shoot Ekko in 5 minutes with a day kill was a light hearted comment.Tbh I didn't get the impression that they were light hearted at all. I was just curious what this was all about.
But as a wolf mason wouldn't she want to get ahead of the game and act like the onus of suspicion is on her partner? Not necessarily but a possible motivation so not sure why it wouldn't be consideredProbably better ways for wolf Flower to claim mason if all she was going to say is 'I am mason with someone I don't know and I don't know how I feel about that'.
i agree in that i really dont feel the tone was "light hearted"Tbh I didn't get the impression that they were light hearted at all. I was just curious what this was all about.
thats just past statistics. u know full well i dont rly try to solve using meta. i can use it as a basis for a weak read but nothing beyond thatso if I take this at face value, you’ll see why I object to you using phrases like ‘99% of the time in this situation, she’s town’
(I’m aware that’s not a direct quote and I’m open to correcting it if I’ve misrepresented the meaning of what you’ve said)
its not about it being serious or notI was obviously fully serious about my threat, because I would definitely shoot someone in 5 minutes with a day kill if they didn't answer my question immediately.
Good Lord.
thats just past statistics. u know full well i dont rly try to solve using meta. i can use it as a basis for a weak read but nothing beyond that
More prattle.its not about it being serious or not
I didn't think u had a day killshot. otherwise why wud u say it anyway. if your intention is to get my alignment and shoot a scum me then you wouldn't tell me u got a kill, because that just leads me into tailoring how i reply to u in order to maybe gain your favor and have u not shoot me
its about the way u came swinging with it in page 2
u arent familiar with her play nearly as much as us, I can see why u may read her not towny for claiming this earlyyou’re saying you wouldn’t challenge someone who drew the opposite conclusion?
Do you remember meThis feels like another culture clash issue lol
its gna be one of them games isn't itMore prattle.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?