Game Ranked Wrestling Wars Mafia

[Grammaton]

and i certainly dont care to appease u either. i asked u about lethal read because u say u r good at reading him

and asked about ratchet because he is the only thing of meat that we had a small discussion about, as u requested I ask u about that

I got ur thought on both matters, which wesn't rly established in case of ratchet's read but I have them atleast

I'll say I got what I asked from that interaction. u didn't rly ask me any question to continue

I’ve never gatekept how to read lethal tho

he has an activity tell, and his speech is generally chalk and cheese when he’s town or scum

i think it likelier that you wanted me to try and make a read off that post and then catch me in a contradiction if I did, rather than genuinely wondering - which would be fine lol, certainly town applications there

instead you ‘genuinely’ thinking I might have a read makes no sense at all. You trying to tell me you’d come away enthused about my processes if the roles were reversed here?

 

[Arne Slot]

also calling me bloodthirsty seems pretty inaccurate given the sheer amount of waffling I did last game. was accused of not being willing to vote with town lol

 

[Ratchet]

BLD doesnt need me to defend him lol

if I town read him it'd be something else. but I'm voting him rn so

I'm getting tired of having to explain everything including subtext. I was saying to Ultra that there doesn't need to be a motive, because it could simply be a lost train of thought.

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

of course I don't the game just started lmao

do you have strong reason to scum read bpd? you're voting him

nope

I'm getting tired of having to explain everything including subtext. I was saying to Ultra that there doesn't need to be a motive, because it could simply be a lost train of thought.

i thought u meant by staying consistent as in if BLD is getting pushed later, I would use it as an excuse to defend him later and not vote for him

which wouldn't be the case as I don't town read him yet

 

[Ultra]

This requires me to assume that as scum, he would keep every single train of thought he had consistent with one another. Seldom the case. Next.

Ah, my mistake to think you'd be interested in worthwhile avenues of discussions and not worthless ones.

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

I’ve never gatekept how to read lethal tho

he has an activity tell, and his speech is generally chalk and cheese when he’s town or scum

i think it likelier that you wanted me to try and make a read off that post and then catch me in a contradiction if I did, rather than genuinely wondering - which would be fine lol, certainly town applications there

instead you ‘genuinely’ thinking I might have a read makes no sense at all. You trying to tell me you’d come away enthused about my processes if the roles were reversed here?

i am not trying to catch u on anything. just want ur current view on lethal

I want to vote one of these 4
bld
lethal
bigman
nevermidn

just asking u who might be better at reading him to tell me what ur early thoughts of him are. i understand he only made one post but I was more looking for a GTH type of deal, not for u to make a read and then I catch u changing it later. that'd be silly because reads made off 1 post can be changed rather easily anytime when lethal starts positing anyway

 

[Grammaton]

I need to check some stuff from Elden ring but cba right now

add it to the list of stuff I need to do

 

[Ratchet]

i thought u meant by staying consistent as in if BLD is getting pushed later, I would use it as an excuse to defend him later and not vote for him

which wouldn't be the case as I don't town read him yet

No, I said for there to be a motive, you would, as scum, have to be keeping track of both the fact you're supposed to be scum reading BPD and that you would jump at a chance to defend a player you felt you could. I am saying, to Ultra, that his question is silly because any motive I could ascribe is in the realms of WIFOM, and there doesn't even need to be one in the first place. I could go further and say Ultra is unduly defending you by implying that there needs to be a motive, but I find that the discourse hs already grown tiresome.

 

[Ratchet]

Ah, my mistake to think you'd be interested in worthwhile avenues of discussions and not worthless ones.

I don't think speculating on possible motives that may not even need to exist is very worthwhile, sorry. Least of all when it concerns Ekko. I'm sure you can find someone else who does.

 

[Grammaton]

i am not trying to catch u on anything. just want ur current view on lethal

I want to vote one of these 4
bld
lethal
bigman
nevermidn

just asking u who might be better at reading him to tell me what ur early thoughts of him are. i understand he only made one post but I was more looking for a GTH type of deal, not for u to make a read and then I catch u changing it later. that'd be silly because reads made off 1 post can be changed rather easily anytime when lethal starts positing anyway

they are all highly uninspiring targets, but I think you should decide yourself

making any kind of read, including a snap GTH off that post is an exercise in banality, and unless you think I’m town, how would it inform your read on him specifically?

 

[Ultra]

I don't think speculating on possible motives that may not even need to exist is very worthwhile, sorry. Least of all when it concerns Ekko. I'm sure you can find someone else who does.

I don't care about what anyone else thinks, I care about what *you* think, because you're voting him and accused him of an undue defense despite the fact that he joined the wagon.

 

[Grammaton]

i am not trying to catch u on anything. just want ur current view on lethal

I want to vote one of these 4
bld
lethal
bigman
nevermidn

just asking u who might be better at reading him to tell me what ur early thoughts of him are. i understand he only made one post but I was more looking for a GTH type of deal, not for u to make a read and then I catch u changing it later. that'd be silly because reads made off 1 post can be changed rather easily anytime when lethal starts positing anyway

Also I didn’t say the bolded

I expressed objections to reading flower off of NAI stuff, what I’m saying I think your intent is/was was to catch me doing the same off a lethal NAI post to either sus me or at least debilitate my argument around flower and the reads she was getting

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

they are all highly uninspiring targets, but I think you should decide yourself

making any kind of read, including a snap GTH off that post is an exercise in banality, and unless you think I’m town, how would it inform your read on him specifically?

i dont lean anywhere on u rn. i think u r better than last game when it comes to interacting with u, which in itself doesn't tell me much because u were town there (altho a pin)

since I don't lean anywhere on lethal either, id rather ask the active player thoughts on the inactive one. i cant rly work on the inactive one

my PoV here is I don't rly outright dislike any of the current active players. ratchet wud be the one I'm somewhat leaning scummy on but I don't mind exploring the inactive ones even with him being alive

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

Also I didn’t say the bolded

I expressed objections to reading flower off of NAI stuff, what I’m saying I think your intent is/was was to catch me doing the same off a lethal NAI post to either sus me or at least debilitate my argument around flower and the reads she was getting

i interpreted this as that

i think it likelier that you wanted me to try and make a read off that post and then catch me in a contradiction if I did, rather than genuinely wondering - which would be fine lol, certainly town applications there

no that wasn't my intention. i wanted just ur take on lethal from the opening. if u don't have any we can end this here until he posts

 

[Ratchet]

I don't care about what anyone else thinks, I care about what *you* think, because you're voting him and accused him of an undue defense despite the fact that he joined the wagon.

I've given you the only answer I care to give you.

 

[EkkoLoJinx]

I need to check some stuff from Elden ring but cba right now

add it to the list of stuff I need to do

about lethal's play?

 

[Ultra]

I've given you the only answer I care to give you.

I find your lack of interest kind of bizarre, honestly. Your response seemed to imply I was calling him town, but it was an open ended question. If you suspect him, does it not occur as odd to you that he contradicts himself?

 

[PHEN0M]

Hey all, checking in.

 

[Ratchet]

I find your lack of interest kind of bizarre, honestly. Your response seemed to imply I was calling him town, but it was an open ended question. If you suspect him, does it not occur as odd to you that he contradicts himself?

More nonsense. I told you, that I don't need to answer about what his possible motive could be, because there may simply not be one. That is already highlighting the possibility of a contradiction. I gave you this answer, and you responded with your usual vapid bluster about focusing on worthwhile discussions over worthless ones. Now you bring up the possibility that it was a contradiction as if I hadn't been saying that was in play from the very start. So we can completely throw away the last sentence.

My response implied that because your demand for a motive carries the assumption that it must be calculated (and it obviously makes little sense to be calculated, though there exist some possibilities in play there - no, I'm not going to list them out). Any more of this garbage or are we done for now?

 

[RDK]