• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked Wrestling Wars Mafia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reader mode
Ratchet said:
They really haven't, though. I don't think my position is unreasonable here, and at least as far as this point itself is concerned, I don't think you think it is either.
Click to expand...
I say this because your tantrum can only really be reconciled as emotional. If you genuinely think I'm scum and making absurd, nonsensical arguments, then there is nothing that's prompting such an emotional outburst. I don't really like reading into emotions too much, especially as you commented on having a headache or migraine or whatever, which I could see influncing your disposition, but all the same.
 
Ratchet said:
I say this because your tantrum can only really be reconciled as emotional. If you genuinely think I'm scum and making absurd, nonsensical arguments, then there is nothing that's prompting such an emotional outburst. I don't really like reading into emotions too much, especially as you commented on having a headache or migraine or whatever, which I could see influncing your disposition, but all the same.
Click to expand...
tedium drives me crazy, especially when others are validating it for no good reason
 
it reminds me of my interactions with BPD in ER but I expect more logic from you so it's obviously more suspicious here, plus the context of you being defensive and apathetic going into this ridiculous attempt to shade me
 
CraigPelton said:
yes it is. you're asking why I didn't voice my suspicions about someone ITT when my suspicions are based on stuff that happened outside the thread, and there was no way for me to voice them ITT without revealing my role
Click to expand...
Uh, I'm quite certain you could have mentioned something based on what Doddsy has posted, or from what other people have said about Doddsy. None of that would require you to claim, especially not if you are careful with your wording.
 
Ratchet said:
Uh, I'm quite certain you could have mentioned something based on what Doddsy has posted, or from what other people have said about Doddsy. None of that would require you to claim, especially not if you are careful with your wording.
Click to expand...
you realize doing that would've made any attempt to get reads on him in our mason chat completely futile right?
 
Ratchet said:
You could have gone the opposite route and defended him in thread. I just went over this. Read.
Click to expand...
I don't have to do what you would've done, I also don't see how that would've been more fruitful. in fact, my method did yield some edible results
 
CraigPelton said:
I don't have to do what you would've done, I also don't see how that would've been more fruitful. in fact, my method did yield some edible results
Click to expand...
It would have given you a comment you could have pulled up from the thread and said "hey look, you see where I defended Doddsy here, that was me trying to win him over". As it stands, I *can* accept your claim, but it's harder for me to just accept it all because there is nothing in thread to evidence what you're saying.
 
* I think it's self explanatory why CP does not provide a read for his own mason partner that he can't elaborate on. Holstering or even lying about how you're reading a Mason buddy is NAI
 
Ratchet said:
It would have given you a comment you could have pulled up from the thread and said "hey look, you see where I defended Doddsy here, that was me trying to win him over". As it stands, I *can* accept your claim, but it's harder for me to just accept it all because there is nothing in thread to evidence what you're saying.
Click to expand...
I wasn't thinking about having something to point to ITT, wasn't expecting to pull the cord this early. anyway if doddsy comes in and says I'm lying about our exchange then that puts us in a 1-for-1 trade which is favorable to town
 
Reader mode
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top