And, in practice, when dropped on the cast, it failed to kill anyone or even destroy the Shadow Border, much like how Artemis, even in her final battle, very much did not blow up a planet. In point of fact, the biggest thing we see her blow up is an island. If you want to argue that Artemis...
forums.spacebattles.com
And, in practice, when dropped on the cast, it failed to kill anyone or even destroy the Shadow Border, much like how Artemis, even in her final battle, very much did not blow up a planet.
The Shadow Border explicitly wasn't anywhere near the battle where Wodime fought everyone at...
Secondly, "It didn't blow up the Planet" can be said for literally any attack that should very much blow up the Planet... but doesn't for the sake of the narrative unless you are going to stupidly say some shit that Interstellar Battleships do not have Planetary Durability for their space trekking.
In point of fact, the biggest thing we see her blow up is an island. If you want to argue that Artemis could theoretically blow up a planet with an unknown amount of charge time and energy requirements, that's one thing, but if you want to also argue that Wodime scales to this theoretically turbo-charged Artemis, that's another that you would need to go about proving.
Ah so the narrative and authoritative intent doesn't suddenly matter now? Funny how they love pulling on this to justify their stupid rants except when it makes no sense.
Other Gods have literally stated Artemis can blow up a Planet, Oddyseus who has full knowledge of what the Gods can do in that History has stated she can blow up Planets, and both Wodime and Zeus are compared to her in firepower. The intent is clear regardless of needing to demonstrate it on-fucking-screen because if that's the case, I guess we can really start throwing out scaling entirely since god knows how many characters don't do what we heard they can do despite the narration and intent stating otherwise.
Atlantis and Olympus were full of statements about how X person could theoretically blow a planet/solar system/whatever, but as it happens, all the people those statements got made about also got fought, and very specifically did not do any of those things.
That's not how that works... Narrative Intent very much matters.
Artemis proved that even with a relatively significant charge time (for a fight) her shots could only blow up islands and could not navigate around small, durable objects held by Servants.
...That doesn't even make sense.
Are we trying to apply real world logic now or are we being fucking stupid in how this shit works for a gotcha?
Artemis doesn't need to blow up the Planet with every shot to show she has the ability to blow through the Planet because that is what Narrative Statements are supposed to be for(because if we don't, American Comics and shit like DBZ would basically be full of outliers no one should care for... but this is SB and they actually try that crap).
And secondly, Artemis only has those cooldowns AFTER the she fires her Planet Destroying Laser for her own safety, she has no literal cooldown if she wants to go all out at risk to herself.
Wodime fought several battles with his full power and didn't destroy Olympus or even the Shadow Border, though it was stated a direct hit could do the latter. Zeus has so many asterisks on his major powers, it's a joke, and can be fought for extended periods of time by relative insects.
Okay, let's play this game then:
Garou compared Saitama to a Mountain thus Garou before CF Garou cannot damage a Mountain. Saitama got hurt by a cat thus he and everyone else has weaker durability than him.
Nolan was able to feel pain being bitten by a Re-Animen, thus he cannot be as strong as he actually is.
Just because characters don't be destroying Planets with their attacks that they should be able to, doesn't mean they cannot, especially when the narrative fully agrees. Even in a VS. Debate, you cannot pretend the lack of showing ALONE means it doesn't exist and it's just hyperbole.
Meanwhile, there's an argument to be made for Scion's ability to destroy a planet that's completely irrelevant, because what he does do is actually devastate continents when he's fighting, which makes him so much stronger than Zeus in practice, if not in theory, that nothing else matters.
Uh? We literally have Fergus threaten the entire US in the FGO American Manga, we have had Surtr literally reduce entire Realms which still work under Norse Cosmology to ashes and damn near burned the entire World to ashes(that's why Scandaniva is literally covered with Ice and Snow, it's literally Skadi's attempts to get rid of Surtr's flames over a FAILED attempt to burn the Planet to ashes), Scion devastating continents when he's fighting doesn't mean shit on it's own.
Zeus didn't die because, as far as we know, Wodime didn't kill him, though he planned to kill him later and killed a couple gods to prove he could, so once again, I'm not really sure what your point is.
Ah yes because LB Zeus = Ancient Gods Dioscuri, that helps your argument... how about actually explain that the reason Wodime CAN kill Lostbelt Zeus is only when Zeus wasn't focusing on him and going all out due to thinking he was just a lone Mage and the reason he believed he can kill him for true is due to the bullshit conceptual powers Animus Animusphere truly is capable of?
But apparently Conceptual anything means nothing despite Conceptual Powers are some of the most broken things in fiction...
forums.spacebattles.com
ha
