I see, thought the "square" just references town itself.
- Status
Rugrat
Caldust
I liked his points on Tweet at end of D1
I’m not sure lynching the indie is the best play here
Woof Woof!
(I caught up and have some thoughts I'd like to share. Tweet made some posts that bothered me for a couple of reasons:)
Here's my main gripe, Tweet calls X's analysis of Flower "Superfluous" and votes him for it...but that criticism doesn't mesh with that action. You cannot say Flower is so obvious she requires no elaboration and then advocate for not lynching Flower.
Worse, when the thread consensus wraps around to town X later in the day, he admits there was nothing behind this vote. He also thinks it's ok for X to vote Fang in this situation.
In combination with his statement "It's only a matter of time" makes it sound like Tweet is acknowledging Flower's demise as an inevitable conclusion, but he is not making himself participant. Which is a problem, because their claim and continued presence in the game is of obvious benefit to mafia, as One points out. As town there is strong demand to vote there, even if it is a forgone conclusion, doesn't seem like Tweet understands that.
Tweet is also largely a passenger in the discussion surrounding Flower's claim. If I'm a wolf, and I see a D1 *Dual Survivor* claim, I have to pretend I'm distressed, but I'm totally going to be kicking up my feet. Free passage into Day 2/3 for me and the boys. They could be lying, they could not be, but at this stage their utility is already known to me, because I have TMI, and I can resume directing my attention elsewhere. I'm not going to chew over it much, I can add some superficial comments to the discussion about them but my motive is to move on and set up more shade. This is exactly what Tweet did.
---
Bottom line: Tweet does not chew over the Indi claim very much, is over it so easily that he chastises X for his thought process...but is not showing an elementary part of a thought process that he should for how bored he is. States one thing, does another, shows little skin in the game. So, to me, this falls more in line with TMI.)
(I caught up and have some thoughts I'd like to share. Tweet made some posts that bothered me for a couple of reasons:)
Here's my main gripe, Tweet calls X's analysis of Flower "Superfluous" and votes him for it...but that criticism doesn't mesh with that action. You cannot say Flower is so obvious she requires no elaboration and then advocate for not lynching Flower.
Worse, when the thread consensus wraps around to town X later in the day, he admits there was nothing behind this vote. He also thinks it's ok for X to vote Fang in this situation.
In combination with his statement "It's only a matter of time" makes it sound like Tweet is acknowledging Flower's demise as an inevitable conclusion, but he is not making himself participant. Which is a problem, because their claim and continued presence in the game is of obvious benefit to mafia, as One points out. As town there is strong demand to vote there, even if it is a forgone conclusion, doesn't seem like Tweet understands that.
Tweet is also largely a passenger in the discussion surrounding Flower's claim. If I'm a wolf, and I see a D1 *Dual Survivor* claim, I have to pretend I'm distressed, but I'm totally going to be kicking up my feet. Free passage into Day 2/3 for me and the boys. They could be lying, they could not be, but at this stage their utility is already known to me, because I have TMI, and I can resume directing my attention elsewhere. I'm not going to chew over it much, I can add some superficial comments to the discussion about them but my motive is to move on and set up more shade. This is exactly what Tweet did.
---
Bottom line: Tweet does not chew over the Indi claim very much, is over it so easily that he chastises X for his thought process...but is not showing an elementary part of a thought process that he should for how bored he is. States one thing, does another, shows little skin in the game. So, to me, this falls more in line with TMI.)
Tempest
Leprous Monarch
I don't think he's lynchproof if that's your reasoning
Woof woof!
(TAT's opening is also horrible, his accusation of "meaningless vote" and "mundane questioning" of Flower reek of TMI that she isn't mafia.)
(TAT's opening is also horrible, his accusation of "meaningless vote" and "mundane questioning" of Flower reek of TMI that she isn't mafia.)
I mean that’s a consideration, but wasting another day lynching the second indy just seems a bit shite lol
I don’t understand the TMI point tho, who did he show TMI of?
He’s the vig lol
Tempest
Leprous Monarch
You're gonna have a fun time trying to read TAT if this is your first time
Where did Tweet unveil TMI stuff? I don't get it.
Woof woof!
(I don't think the argument that X was being over the top is terrible, but you must take the position that Flower is necessary to lynch first to justify it, and *that's* why I'm scum reading tweet. Because he is showing little commitment to this in his play. He also didn't really push the thought very far, so I'm extending less charity. Indie chewing is very much a scum tactic, but so is not giving a shit.)
TAT
Preeminent
TAT
Preeminent
what exactly are you implying
Woof woof!
(Go look at his early posts. When everyone is grilling Flower over her claim, he's kinda just there. Also, he makes some bizarre post about how he believes Flower's thoughts on you, after her claim, which immediately doesn't strike me as obvious what he means by that.
Now I can believe that he can do this as town, or reach the conclusion of what to do here faster than other players did. What I don't believe is that he misses the basic understanding that we shouldn't *not* lynch Flower in doing so. So I think it's TMI, a town reaching this point doesn't handwaive a Flower lynch as "only a matter of time" like she's self resolving, she needs to go and he was not seeing to that)
- Status