• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked EastEnders Mafia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cuz its for the benefit of town?
You are just wanting to "waste" a cop on you if you are town?

:zilla1:

id say having me confirmed might be useful?

your whole line here is disingenuous as fuck cause I am 100% certain that had I said try someone else instead, you would take it as sus also, which makes this conversation a waste of time if there’s evidence you’re probable town
 
@Ratchet This was your last response to me. I was looking for further evaluation of his play from you, and you didn't take the opportunity to do so. I'm not going to squeeze water out of a rock, especially because I don't feel strongly about Rugrat's alignment - I just don't follow your reasoning and I think your read of him demands a bit more explanation than what you've given if you're making a push.
I don't mind pulling up the quotes to further explain my thought process, will have to wait until later tonight though. I just think that when you ask me where the consideration for his macro play is, then there must have been something you think I've skipped over when I don't. I could barely tell you anything about Rugrat's game aside from that one point. Which I suppose is saying something in it's own right, but you see my point.
 
So Poyser will extend an olive branch to Tweet, who he is conflicted about, but will just straight up put me on ignore, someone he has a pretty strong town read on. Both me and Tweet were sussing him, but both of us got very different treatments.
So what does that tell you?
 
You were getting sussed because you were trying to act like she wasn’t already solved as not Town when she was kek
I engaged with Flower a bit more after her claim to see if she was wolf or harmful indie. Considering she exposed a mate in xenos, no harm seeing if she really was a wolf to find anymore team equity.
 
id say having me confirmed might be useful?

your whole line here is disingenuous as fuck cause I am 100% certain that had I said try someone else instead, you would take it as sus also, which makes this conversation a waste of time if there’s evidence you’re probable town
The evidence is the claim, by the way. If you think that the claim is compelling then you obviously think he's town. There isn't any further context that you're missing, it's the claim straight up.
 
So far its been:

- Poyser vs BPD
- me vs BPD
- Gramma vs T-Pein

Day 2 has been fun

Just need more activity from guys like Alco, Imposter, and Kekko.
 
Cute I'm off ignore now. Got your emotions in check?
I’m not emotional I just find it pointless talking to you when you don’t listen to a word I say, never re-evaluate anything and just make dumb digs. Like I get frustrated at trying to deal with you and then I get conscious of the fact that the rest of the thread doesn’t want to read us arguing for 20 pages in a discussion that goes absolutely no where as every discussion with you ends up
 
No, me and tpein voted on his awkward post asking about BBC shows, then BPD followed afterwards when he questioned the TSA thing
I see. Personally I think the TSA thing was the most egregious behaviour from him rather than early fluff, so it's not a huge shift reads wisebut I'd be remiss to not note that I'd been operating under the idea X got that ball rolling.
 
I got and idea, let's sync our votes together so we can have more power in this thread, we are being drowned out by the louder but no substance voices

unvote vote OLU
 
I don't mind pulling up the quotes to further explain my thought process, will have to wait until later tonight though. I just think that when you ask me where the consideration for his macro play is, then there must have been something you think I've skipped over when I don't. I could barely tell you anything about Rugrat's game aside from that one point. Which I suppose is saying something in it's own right, but you see my point.

I alluded to it. He went on to A) Pretty freely town read tweet and reverse that read and B) for a rather abstract reason. And I don't think that fits the profile of what your case on him is - a scum who needed a rubber stamped reason to push town tweet - on both accounts.
 
I see. Personally I think the TSA thing was the most egregious behaviour from him rather than early fluff, so it's not a huge shift reads wisebut I'd be remiss to not note that I'd been operating under the idea X got that ball rolling.
That was egregious too, but when someone comes in the thread and tries hard to create discussion that is not only not game related but also not even theme related then it’s a pretty giant red flag lol. It’s not like he was reacting to stuff being talked about in the thread. I saw X as the guy that just piled onto the bandwagon but then over compensated by going harder lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top