Because you came in with 30 minutes left, you could posture as much as you wanted but it was unlikely to change the lynch from your pov
- It's that time of the year again! Just kidding, we were late.
Click here to see the awards and nominate people for the rest of the categories.
- We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!
- Status
One Last Username
Acclaimed
Who we whacking today?
Day 3 Vote Count 1
RDK
Resplendent
Vote Count:
Ekko (1): Imposter
Poyser (1): TAT
Alco (1): Ultra
With 20 alive it takes 11 to lynch
??
I was defending someone being pushed, of course it’s going to be questioned… are you trying to say that would have surprised me, or that I’d be worried/scared of it? Because if so then why choose to defend him in the first place? And surely flipping my read on its head would just lead to more intense questioning?
are you stupid lol? I would literally know whether or not the read is right, so I’d have no need to think of it as being bad
She claimed survivor duo and was clearly caught lying kek
Also you can repeat I’m lacking analysis as much as you want lmao it’s not gonna make it true, the thread is literally full of it
She outed herself intentionally to save Xenos, which ended up her getting lynched instead.
If you think I'm town then there's no reason given why you would want to vote Ratchet, you felt strongly about wanting to get Ekko out of here throughout day 2 and earlier today, why the switch to him?
I am saying this is a specific observation I made in/after a game that was met with some applause. I don't believe you say this completely independently, no. It's not the most damning part - it can be derived you were talking about town Ekko without that context - but that is why it struck out to me
This response has nothing to do with what I asked. I will try it once more:are you stupid lol? I would literally know whether or not the read is right, so I’d have no need to think of it as being bad
Do you see no way for someone to, within reason, see your progression on Tweet and feel like your initial town read caught you negative attention?
It wasn't that you were town reading tweet that was questioned, it was the reasoning that underpinned it. Reasoning that you yourself walked back, using an entirely different point to justify doing so. Hello?
Alco
Distinguished
I think you’re overestimating how much I care about mafia if you think I’m gonna go out there and quote something you said on the Discord lol
Also, you are again conflating the read with the reasoning. The read can be wrong or right, it's not actually important here. The reasoning is what you are ultimately judged from, and your reasoning for reading Tweet town was bad. I think you're doing this intentionally by the way, you know exactly what I'm saying and you're altering the point to make it easier to dismiss. We call that a strawman fallacy.are you stupid lol? I would literally know whether or not the read is right, so I’d have no need to think of it as being bad
Wait whatShe outed herself intentionally to save Xenos, which ended up her getting lynched instead.
If you think I'm town then there's no reason given why you would want to vote Ratchet, you felt strongly about wanting to get Ekko out of here throughout day 2 and earlier today, why the switch to him?
Alco
Distinguished
I see where You’re coming from, I think, in that I use supposedly town behavior to accuse Ekko, but in this case what’s bothering me is that he’s leaning so much into it without any merit. Almost as if he saw some people questioning his absence and him wanting to make up ground
I'm saying the opposite - you didn't mean to quote me, it was something you just said subconsciously that just happened to be my observation. You reached for something in your brain to shade Ekko and that's what you found.
Oh and woof woof woof
I don’t know what you’re going on about kek
- Status