• We are currently rolling out incremental alterations to the forum. Don't freak! You aren't going crazy.

Game Ranked The Traitors Mafia

Status
Not open for further replies.

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
4 pages of complete and utter fluffed drivel. Nice.

Dice rolling for votes? What nonsense.



Why are you aiming for buddy points?
This is such a shite post as well, but seems like a pretty standard TOWN lethal entrance. Doubt he starts off by being aggro towards me out of everybody
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
which game of his did u see have fire from 3 pages in? this another shade by u. i cant say this is how u were in fairy tail man


wud of liked this more if u stopped after the first line. now u kinda gave him the answer. not sure why. we'll see


natalija's respond to me came way later, so no.. they were not around. her response came roughly 18 minutes AFTER your vote. it's not something you can predict and use as a reason for the vote. bad
U wot

Yes, they came back and responded 18 mins later…. Then still said nothing game related. Makes my point stronger not weaker lmao
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
u think magic who tells me not to fluff just makes stupid points like that? what for?

if it's to obtain a reaction then you dissmissing it *should* be a reaction of its own that magic has to yet talk about. what should we make of that?


he hasnt responded about it yet as far as i see, unless u consider his replies to me about his lack of vote a response. the idea here being that he called you scummy but doesnt seem to really care


not rly for second line. he has tame town games too, specially early in the game
Well I don’t really think he genuinely thought my post was scummy lol, so be interesting to see how he follows up. I’m not really sure where he stands atm other than town reads on Shep and tweet, and I need more on the Shep one because i don’t really see where it comes from
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
Roundaboutly that's what I was getting at, I'm not sure if you expect this to be a compelling defense. At the very least, if by your own admission you were bullshitting I'm not sure why I lose points in your book for calling you out for it.



If you're asking this question then surely you have some reason to think I should be approaching you differently. I'm all ears.
You lose points because the scumhunting feels forced. What exactly is it you expect me to do when it’s just me and Ekko around in pages 1-2 of the game. Expecting any kind of bite and hunting is pretty unrealistic which is why I don’t really see it as genuine from you.

Do you have any other thoughts on the game at all? There’s way more content now than page 1 fluff to sink your teeth into
 

Emil

Average Diabellstar Witch Enjoyer
V.I.P. Member
U wot

Yes, they came back and responded 18 mins later…. Then still said nothing game related. Makes my point stronger not weaker lmao
no poyser, your vote came before her post. you cannot vote then use a future post as a reason to justify it

i dont have an issue with the vote itself. actually forgot what started this interaction
 

Ultra

THE BEAR
Moderator
Null really. Her comment on recruits strikes me more like a calculated thing to say than not.

Next question - if I can sum up your contribution to this thread as taking a town read off the table who by your own admission you aren't even scum reading, how do you think I should be reading you right now?
 

Emil

Average Diabellstar Witch Enjoyer
V.I.P. Member
Huh? You thought I was gonna lock in my vote on the second page kek?

Natalja’s entrance is the most sus to me. They were in the thread but seemed scared to post. Just posted about the vote mechanic and dipped kek. They were still around tho, cos also responded to ekkos question about being faithful
oh right this

the first part is ok (i dont think nat entrance is sus for her) but okay its w.e. she only had 1 post. the second part (bolded) cannot be included as a reason for the vote, but can possibly be included as a reason for the scum read i guess? do u still hold that scum read of nat?
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
no poyser, your vote came before her post. you cannot vote then use a future post as a reason to justify it

i dont have an issue with the vote itself. actually forgot what started this interaction
I wasn’t justifying my vote kek
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
oh right this

the first part is ok (i dont think nat entrance is sus for her) but okay its w.e. she only had 1 post. the second part (bolded) cannot be included as a reason for the vote, but can possibly be included as a reason for the scum read i guess? do u still hold that scum read of nat?
Yes, I’d say Nat, RAEM and Ultra are the guys I don’t like this far

Already probably enough to say RAEM and Ultra are less likely to be aligned
 

Poyser

Moderator
Moderator
I’ve got

Hime
Aurelian
Lethal

As town so far

Haven’t really minded Ekko so far either tbh, seems pretty focussed and wanting to hunt players down so you can add a soft town lean on him too
 

Emil

Average Diabellstar Witch Enjoyer
V.I.P. Member
Yes, I’d say Nat, RAEM and Ultra are the guys I don’t like this far

Already probably enough to say RAEM and Ultra are less likely to be aligned
i like nat and ultra so far so dont agree much

back to magic topic, if u think his post is irrelevant and not worthy of addressing (when hes a non fluff player) do u not consider it in one way or another alignment indicative? i think magic might be rusty on his day 1 scum game. his town game was good hes struggling to match it. i feel him off as opposed to last game

also u called aurelian town and that's another name magic shaded earlier, also without any vote
 

Ultra

THE BEAR
Moderator
You lose points because the scumhunting feels forced. What exactly is it you expect me to do when it’s just me and Ekko around in pages 1-2 of the game. Expecting any kind of bite and hunting is pretty unrealistic which is why I don’t really see it as genuine from you.

Do you have any other thoughts on the game at all? There’s way more content now than page 1 fluff to sink your teeth into

It's an early impression - categorically it cannot be anything but lacking in evidence. I fail to see how that's an indictment on me for calling out things that catch my eye.

No thoughts. None.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top