Xcano believes that 100 humans can beat anything on land
- We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!
Circus of Humorous & Humiliating Arguments Part 5: Diamonds are fleeting. Stupid lasts forever
- Thread starter Masterblack06
- Start date
Xcano believes that 100 humans can beat anything on land
grillmaster
Exceptional
the person below is right about gorillas being gentle, theres just one small issue here
i was under the assumption that for these fights we assume the animals are bloodlusted
otherwise i think if you had a hundred people gathered together a gorilla probably would run off cause its just not worth fighting a hundred people
but then theres no fight so wtf is the point
i was under the assumption that for these fights we assume the animals are bloodlusted
otherwise i think if you had a hundred people gathered together a gorilla probably would run off cause its just not worth fighting a hundred people
but then theres no fight so wtf is the point
grillmaster
Exceptional
with tools absolutely thats our best advantage being tools and traps, but then you get schizoposts like the one OG showed where they talk about getting several people to physically hold down a brown bear and get one guy to punch it in the face
which is just
lol
Darth Zion
Preeminent
Even without spears, a hundred unarmed humans can just pick up rocks and eventually stone almost anything that walks on land to death.
Stones would certainly not hurt any animal with thick hides, but it does not need to- all we need to do is go prehistoric, keep them on the run for four to five days and watch as they drop from exhaustion and overheat. Humans are not made for strength, we have stamina builds for a reason.
The advantage of being bipedal and built for low energy jogging
Yeah no, most of these debates arent "the humans vs an animal thats just gonna run" its "unarmed humans vs an animal thats trying to kill and wont run"
Your not stoning an elephant to death
your getting fucking killed
Your not stoning an elephant to death
your getting fucking killed
Darth Zion
Preeminent
Tell that to the larger wooly mammoths we hunted to extinction with sticks and stones.
There's literally nothing in the world that a hundred humans can't hunt. Ten or twenty men, I can see them losing to the starting rampage. But a hundred working together, no chance.
Tell that to the larger wooly mammoths we hunted to extinction with sticks and stones.
There's literally nothing in the world that a hundred humans can't hunt. Ten or twenty, I can see losing. But a hundred, no chance.
thats not unarmed fam
also how you gonna compare us to the absolute monsters that our ancestors are
We were not beating wolly mammoths bare handed homeboy
Yeah the post clearly said unarmed as in Xcano is such a stupid fuck he thinks we can take on Elephants with our bare hands. The only way a hundred humans can possibly beat an elephant with their bare hands is if it's a very sick and nearly dying elephant, they use the landscape to trick it into a ditch or cliff or they have such fanatical zeal or lack of fear they proceed to just dogpile and slow it down through sheer volume of dead bodies to where they can get lucky and just pick it's eyes out, but that is easier said than done, especially when almost no human being is that brave, or stupid, to get near those things in a fight.
thats not unarmed fam
also how you gonna compare us to the absolute monsters that our ancestors are
We were not beating wolly mammoths bare handed homeboy
like yeah 100 dudes can beat a lot of things on land barehanded but we gotta at least be realisticYeah the post clearly said unarmed as in Xcano is such a stupid fuck he thinks we can take on Elephants with our bare hands. The only way a hundred humans can possibly beat an elephant with their bare hands is if it's a very sick and nearly dying elephant, they use the landscape to trick it into a ditch or cliff or they have such fanatical zeal or lack of fear they proceed to just dogpile and slow it down through sheer volume of dead bodies to where they can get lucky and just pick it's eyes out, but that is easier said than done, especially when almost no human being is that brave, or stupid, to get near those things in a fight.
Darth Zion
Preeminent
The physical capabilities of the ancestors are widely exaggerated, evolution does not happen quickly enough for humans to have changed that quickly in a couple thousand years. Your mammoth hunting caveman would not be physically different from a tribal African or Indian whose lived in the wild his whole life.
They begin unarmed, the elephant manages to kill around ten or twenty in the starting rampage as the rest retreat to a safer distance and regroup. Then they unleash hell upon the beast.
If you're expecting humans to just bullrush the animal in one go, then that's stupid. You're taking away the strongest tool given to our species, our greatest weapon- the mind. There's nothing saying the hundred humans just can't run away at the start to forage the spears and stones. I've talked to people from tribes in Bengal who occasionally hunt tigers and elephants with wooden sticks in groups of ten so I'm pretty sure that a hundred humans do defeat anything on land.
Barehanded and stupid though, an elephant or a rhino has thick enough hide that nothing we do would even register to them unless we somehow manage to poke out the eye. That's not gonna happen against an elephant, especially so I would agree with you on that.
bro that was 14K Years. What do you mean a couple thousand
Also evolution can happen fast or slow there is no set amount of time that has to pass
Thats the problem dawg, your using your head
when these people say unarmed
they mean with their bare fucking hands
This shit stemed from people on tiktok thinking that in a 1v1 a man can easily handle ANY breed of dog barehanded. You underestimated just how stupid these niggas really are
grillmaster
Exceptional
fwiw i do think in natural circumstances a hundred people would absolutely win, the issue is the vs matchup is not natural circumstances, if it were its more likely than anything that the animal would see a mob of a hundred people and decide it isnt worth it and leave
and morons think those hundred people would just zerg rush a bloodlusted elephant and idk kick it in the knees or something, when what'd really happen is it'd just thunder at them and trample everyone
fist fighting a hypothetical bloodlusted elephant might as well be like fist fighting a monster truck
to play devils advocate though, this isnt counting stamina
like the tiger or bear could probably maul a dozen or two dozen unarmed humans if theyre just trying to rush and fist fight it, a better question i think is how long until the tiger gets exhausted from just one shotting people
and morons think those hundred people would just zerg rush a bloodlusted elephant and idk kick it in the knees or something, when what'd really happen is it'd just thunder at them and trample everyone
fist fighting a hypothetical bloodlusted elephant might as well be like fist fighting a monster truck
to play devils advocate though, this isnt counting stamina
like the tiger or bear could probably maul a dozen or two dozen unarmed humans if theyre just trying to rush and fist fight it, a better question i think is how long until the tiger gets exhausted from just one shotting people
Like I said, there are a lot of animals 100 niggas can for sure take down, we'd loose a shit ton of people but its doable
elephants? hippos? fuck no
grillmaster
Exceptional
im telling you if that mastodon puts me into a situation ill just use my aikido skills to
grillmaster
Exceptional
i think the 100 humans could win if they use some sort of supernatural chi power to astral project all their punches simultaneously into the enemy and ignore distance so all 100 humans simultaneously get a punch in
Darth Zion
Preeminent
Very rarely did actual hunters make use of such traps, like pushing mammoths from mountain edges by tricking them into corners or making them fall into already dug ditches is just a modern glorification of human intelligence.
The chances of animals falling for that was very low, making it an inefficient method to hunt. Ancient humans did not have the commodity of failure, people starved when hunts went unsuccessful so almost nobody took the risk of the animal taking a wrong turn or detecting the trap. They used more successful methods, which involved hunting them for days and killing them when they dropped from exhaustion.
The chances of that failing were pretty low. The chances of the animal taking a wrong turn during the chase and missing the trap entirely is pretty high in comparison.
I mean, even twenty thousand years is not long enough for a species to change significantly. Evolution is not that quick...
I don't think it would not get exhausted from mauling a hundred people, especially if they just charge at it continously. If anyone has been around mules or horses used by then they'd know animals can keep walking and running just as long as most people can.
Using the woolly mammoth example- the cavemen did not just constantly run for days without breaks behind the mammoth or fight it in rounds until it dropped dead from exhaustion.
The hunting party would follow the mammoth, harass it into running around for a couple of hours and then retreat to put it into a false sense of security. The exhausted animal would seek out food and water, and the hunting party would follow behind it for the same. Then the mammoth and the humans would both drink, eat, and sleep.
The only difference between the two being that humans would be back on their feet for another round of chase and harassment in about an hour or so, whereas the mammoth would still be exhausted from the previous round. This would repeat again and again for several days until the mammoth would either give up or drop from exhaustion. That's what people mean when they say humans have superior stamina.
Last edited:
Meanwhile the range for evolutions is weeks in a lab to millions of years
not that quick is not something you say when it comes to evolution