Lol watSo why do you have two completely different viewpoints on the whole town/wolf mason thing regarding your positions on Fang and Ratchet? It has been said that a wolf mason could be just mason and nothing else. Fang really shouldn't be that much different than Ratchet based on their mason claims, yeah?
Like your literally arguing with Fang that Ratchet could be wolf mason when Fang's own check isn't even 100.
One thing we agree with. No way in hell you, me, and Tpein are a team.That OLU list is positively horrendous lmao
Why were you reading Fang town before?Lol wat
It’s more likely that a scum mason would have a secondary role. I’d say it’s actually a lot more likely that they would than not. That said, they COULD be a mason and nothing else, sure. Again, this is why I said he wasn’t 100%
Ratchet is not confirmed to be a mason and nothing else, so obviously not the same
The rest is just dumb, clearly the fact that before all this came out, I read Aurelian as town anyway and Ratchet as scum anyway plays a part in how I’m reading them kek
Would be a good play to know ahead of time that cp was gonna cop Ratchet so we could make that whole thing work initOne thing we agree with. No way in hell you, me, and Tpein are a team.
You and Tpein, though...
Probably, but it's been said to have been done before where wolf mason is just mason. To me, your check on shouldnt absolve him from his terrible play.Only CP says that.
mason + something else always for scum mason.
Because his play and response to pressure in this game isn’t even same universe let alone same ballpark as his play when he has been scum in the two scum games I’ve seen himWhy were you reading Fang town before?
I'm talking about his activity and involvement since the game started. Are you actually asking me to ISO his posts for you and parade them here?Ah ok
Can you point me to his solve?
I've heard enough.
Vote: Poyser
Bonus questions for the room:
1 - Why does Poyser apologise to Ultra in the post where he rescinds his Town read of Tweet if his reasoning now had no issue with it?
2 - Why did other players besides myself take exception with his reasoning, and if I'm not mistaken here, most notably Tweet himself?
I think Poyser is very transparently bloviating in his arguments - he dismisses points against him as stupid and nonsensical and tries to posit that there is no justifiable reason for the conclusions made to have been made. In spite of this, he continues to conflate the arguments themselves - when his reasoning is discussed, he makes it about the conclusion of the read for example. I feel like I've given more than enough opportunity here for him to show some form of a logical thought process - it is entirely absent.
I don't recall reading him town. Can you pull that up please?
Yesterday, I questioned why Tweet as Scum would claim Tree Stump. I believe it was you who provided a perfectly plausible and agreeable counter to that, which I duly retired, and then insisted he was firmly Null. I suppose you can argue that me saying "I don't know why scum tweet claims stump" is town reading him, but you were fully aware of this position I held, and you were fully aware of my resulting progression, so you trying to present it as a contradiction now is outright disingenuous.
I'm struggling to find the post where I said I think he gave up which looked bad on him, but I did find the post where I mentioned his stump claim was my (singular) reservation.
This post was directly towards Poyser, he read it and responded to it. In other words, he has no excuse to make this post:
I rest my case.
I think Tpein could be his lying buddy, yeah.@Black Pegged Dragon
I certainly don't think Poyser's claim is Teflon, Bus Driver is after all typically a scum flavored role, but I think you have to consider his usage and the evidence instead of just relying on "he could be" at this point. Like you have to argue T-Pein is his lying buddy or come up with a plausible reason for him as a bus driving target, like trying to snatch helpful abilities, and present it as a likely scenario. I'd rather step back and vote elsewhere for now especially since I wasn't quite sold on him in the first place, but if you wanna be taken seriously you need to step back a sec and not just shout into the void. Woof.
Anything to input?Sooooo
Everytime I come in here and wanna catch up, all I see are AIDS posts
I'd hope not, Fang isn't a shitty player. If hardly expect him to collapse every time he rolls scum. You think he can't step up his game a bit and react to pressure?Because his play and response to pressure in this game isn’t even same universe let alone same ballpark as his play when he has been scum in the two scum games I’ve seen him
I think Tpein could be his lying buddy, yeah.
But I agree, Poyser isn't the lynch today. I think all the players that claimed today and have this day free.
Yeah, but if hypothetically you and Tpein are mates, did Craig copping Ratchet hurt you, or in this scenario did wolf Tpein just get a free town check?Would be a good play to know ahead of time that cp was gonna cop Ratchet so we could make that whole thing work init
Unless… CP is with us too!
No, you said he was actively solving which I don’t really believe is true at all. In fact I’ve already said I think he was trying to force the logic to fit me being scum rather than trying to solve me, because he showed no consideration at all to the fact that me playing how I played around tweet doesn’t make a whole lot of sense coming from scum.I'm talking about his activity and involvement since the game started. Are you actually asking me to ISO his posts for you and parade them here?
Seemed like he did a fairly good job at his engagement with you.
But considering all possibilities? Come on man, you are always brain storming outside the box as well. If anything, me not barreling towards this idea shows I have spoke restraint this game.and this is why you will stay in the scum list.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?