apologies will respond now during my breakIs Xadlin just hard ghosting this or what? I'm going to be quite upset if he's town - @Xadlin can you at least make a token effort? Claim or whatever, give us *something* to discuss.
This looks like an extremely lazy attempt from you. You don't suspect anyone else?Vote lynch Xaldin
This is my pick for a lynch.
I think Xaldin deserves a vote in isolation. And knowing what he is helps with wagon analysis. I didn’t really “feel” a detail attempt yesterday. I could possibly see him being red too, hence him not coming back and not voting and Tat not even voting against the other wagon lol.
Chance Tat just genuinely never got back on and didn’t know he was gonna be lynched I guess, but if he had any idea… why not just vote the counter wagon. What’s the worse that could happen? You look scummy? You get lynched anyway? You get lynched the next day? All worth voting to get into another night if you’re him.
Can you stop OMGUSing everyone for a second?change vote lynch Xadlin
Die scum. Wish I had a kill right now.
Me too, I don't see the whole fuss after ISOing him, it's a handful of posts of nothing.I'm putting a very low chance of xaldin being scum due to everyone having a singular read of him and not even attempting to do anything differently lol.
You can claim abilities in general terms, just not with flavour. If you're not sure, ask Ekko exactly what you're allowed to claim for each one.apologies will respond now during my break
due to my low activity i dont know much. cant really claim anything since i dont wanna be modkilled.
i can mostly do thing s duering night so cant do much during the day phase.
I voted psychich since i saw people vote for them. Im not a detective, im usually only go for my abilities adn try to be more involvedm but due to finals i cant really do that.
Sigh.I asked to sub out to, but felt my low activity could still be somewhat good. cant drop this final atm
but i targeted sworder during the night
It's actually pretty remarkable you're low activity, yet you still managed to win the game and target someone at night. What did you target him with?I asked to sub out to, but felt my low activity could still be somewhat good. cant drop this final atm
but i targeted sworder during the night
Good post, I wonder if you'd take all this effort as scum
- Flower (1): Empty, Flower (2): Self, Flower (3): Clone
Based on this, RDK should get 0 from Flower (1). In order to maintain "0", Xadlin (1), TAT (1) and Tweet's shot on RDK (3) should be in total "0".
- Xadlin who didn't shoot anyone somehow has "4". There are in total 5 x Xadlin 3 shots, and 4 x Xadlin (1) shots. For him to get "4", he must hide his clone in (1) and leave (3) empty.
Based on this, RDK should get -1 from Xadlin (1). In order to reach "0", his TAT (1) and Tweet's RDK (3) should total to "0". That is only possible if his TAT (1) gets him +2, and Tweet's RDK (3) loses him -1. So RDK must have hid himself in (3), while TAT must have hid himself in (1).
- Tweet gets +1 from Magic (1), Magic (2), Magic (3). In order to maintain "2", RDK (3) and TAT (2) should be in total "1".
Based on above, Tweet successfuly predicted RDK's self-box so it gets him +2, but he got -1 from hitting TAT (2) so he must have hit TAT's clone box. So that tells us TAT (2) is clone.
- In order for Juliet to get +5, those who shot her must have missed. So Juliet (2) should be Juliet's clone. Kobe (2) was empty, and so was Xadlin (3) based on above. In order for Tpein to have -2, he must have hit one clone from TAT (3) and Hime (2). Based on above, TAT (3) is empty. So Hime (2) must have been clone.
--
TL;DR
Tweet, RDK and TAT knew each other's "self" clones. In combination with EoD shenanigans, it becomes very much possible that RDK, TAT and Tweet are teammates.
You can claim your abilities in general Mafia terms. Just not flavour/character.I asked to sub out to, but felt my low activity could still be somewhat good. cant drop this final atm
but i targeted sworder during the night
Yeah. He was active in scum chat, though.You just gave them town reads two posts before this, what changed yourmindgut?
Is this correct @Flower
It does seem kinda convenient, huhThis feels like a careful scum excuse
Shot at 3 people I was sus of at the time without barely even reading the mini game tbh
- Flower (1): Empty, Flower (2): Self, Flower (3): Clone
Based on this, RDK should get 0 from Flower (1). In order to maintain "0", Xadlin (1), TAT (1) and Tweet's shot on RDK (3) should be in total "0".
- Xadlin who didn't shoot anyone somehow has "4". There are in total 5 x Xadlin 3 shots, and 4 x Xadlin (1) shots. For him to get "4", he must hide his clone in (1) and leave (3) empty.
Based on this, RDK should get -1 from Xadlin (1). In order to reach "0", his TAT (1) and Tweet's RDK (3) should total to "0". That is only possible if his TAT (1) gets him +2, and Tweet's RDK (3) loses him -1. So RDK must have hid himself in (3), while TAT must have hid himself in (1).
- Tweet gets +1 from Magic (1), Magic (2), Magic (3). In order to maintain "2", RDK (3) and TAT (2) should be in total "1".
Based on above, Tweet successfuly predicted RDK's self-box so it gets him +2, but he got -1 from hitting TAT (2) so he must have hit TAT's clone box. So that tells us TAT (2) is clone.
- In order for Juliet to get +5, those who shot her must have missed. So Juliet (2) should be Juliet's clone. Kobe (2) was empty, and so was Xadlin (3) based on above. In order for Tpein to have -2, he must have hit one clone from TAT (3) and Hime (2). Based on above, TAT (3) is empty. So Hime (2) must have been clone.
--
TL;DR
Tweet, RDK and TAT knew each other's "self" clones. In combination with EoD shenanigans, it becomes very much possible that RDK, TAT and Tweet are teammates.
Huh?It does seem kinda convenient, huh
Not convenient as someone actually telling me what I missed, though.
Looking back a bit, it looks like there was a lot of discussion about a guy who is currently dead and not participating.
It was a good opportunity for everyone involved to make themselves look scummy, but in a way that doesn't really give me anything substantial to work with.
Idk, can someone make sense of this for me?
Why do people keep saying I pushed away from TAT lynch lolGood post, I wonder if you'd take all this effort as scum
It's possible both are his scummates. RDK was pushing away from the TAT lynch and Tweet was... Tweeting
@John Wayne do you still want to lynch ratchet? can you give me some reads outside of that?
Cause as much as I read, whatever the discussion was, you were rather stubborn to lynch Xadlin. Stubbornness and not considering other options can just be aimless scumming sometimesWhy do people keep saying I pushed away from TAT lynch lol
I was voting xladin all day, joined tat to help Magic pressure him and then went back to xladin as my lynch choice
People just completely ignoring context
Yeah, but you gotta admit it just looks weird given your vote tied the both of them. Not thinking you're scum, though. You bussed in the Big 3 game in a similar situation, so I don't see why you're pushed as scum for it now when you 99% would have bussed TAT there as his team mate. His role didn't even look so powerful that it would have needed to be saved.Why do people keep saying I pushed away from TAT lynch lol
I was voting xladin all day, joined tat to help Magic pressure him and then went back to xladin as my lynch choice
People just completely ignoring context
Not that it clears RDK, but to be chronologically correct it was Tweet that tied them with vote change. RDK's change was the first domino, though.Yeah, but you gotta admit it just looks weird given your vote tied the both of them. Not thinking you're scum, though. You bussed in the Big 3 game in a similar situation, so I don't see why you're pushed as scum for it now when you 99% would have bussed TAT there as his team mate. His role didn't even look so powerful that it would have needed to be saved.
There are several pages arguing about TAT being lynched and I have no idea what that accomplished. T-pein told me to go look back at those in specific when i asked if someone could explain what's been happening, and that’s what I got from it.Huh?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?