RDK
Marvelous
I didn't realize he had can you show me
I didn't realize he had can you show meMeh, you're assuming then that either Xadlin holstered or was blocked or the Indie did, for nights 1 and 2. It's a bit of a reach for me, especially when Nibel straight up implied he was going to shoot Magic at some point.
@RDKWhy? I claimed. You believe me or not. You're one of my scum reads, if you survive the lynch, you'll have an answer.
If we do, we should establish an order beforehand.We doin mass claim today?
Fair enough I didn't see that. Probably wouldn't lynch him then
If we do, we should establish an order beforehand.
Fair enough I didn't see that. Probably wouldn't lynch him then
- Favoured of the Gods (If you target an Olympian who isn’t already favouring another, you will be empowered with a buff according to the Olympian targeted. NOTE: This role is NOT safe to claim). You begin this game with the favour of Hermes, and you may may empower your Rolecop shot with 1x Hider modifier (you will be untargetable during a night phase this is used) – you may only ‘store’ the favour of one god at a time)
- Loyalty (If Asterius falls before you, you will be enraged and your role will be amended)
I don't know what any of this means lol
My role is Party Time!
It allows night roles to fire off without consuming a shot. Also disregards time based restrictions during the following night phase.
SK/VigCan anyone tell me whats the point of Magic having a x1 Hider as scum
Flavour and usage?My role is Party Time!
It allows night roles to fire off without consuming a shot. Also disregards time based restrictions during the following night phase.
Need Tweet and Ratchet to claim todayWe're almost there anywho
Ultra - JK
Aurelian - Census/???
Orca - Tracker
Nibel - Vig
Luka - Some sort of redirector thingie?
Dr. Watson - Zeus bodyguard
RDK - VT
Tpein - VT
Unclaimed
Tweet
Ratchet
Alco/Evans
Flavour and usage?
What does this mean?
Why do you think the xaldin read sucks? Have you actually seen him play?
Also idk why you're hating on vibes. That said I'm 99% sure I did explain my Watson town read. I didn't like her initial over defense to what Luka said and then afterwards she continued digging in not wanting to be too expansive in her reads and wanting to wait it out. It comes across as more of a genuine thought and play than if she suddenly pivoted and tried forcing reads as that's what scum do to appease the people accusing them.
He's done more as town in other games but that's generally as the game moves on. I'm comparing his play here to other games in which he's been scum not other games he's been town as the latter is much more likely to result in a false lead than the former
What do you think of Ratchet being hung up on my first post of the game/vote on luka
Xaldin has a habit of doing literally nothing at times due to inactivity, tkok-esque.
Vote ekko
I didn't like his early content either so I'll support here until I can catch up
the dolfa wagon seems like a distraction from the ekko wagon to be totally honest. he didn't really do much to have garnered as much attention as he did. seems like they saw ratchet vote there and then followed when the main other wagon of interest/person of interest at this point was ekko(who ratchet also suspected).
im not going by number of votes(as they all came on page 1 as far as i can tell as i havent seen any other votes on him since) but rather actual suspicions. craig/ratchet/luka/ultra all sussed ekko at that point for his actual content. dofla had almost nothing comparatively.
obviously didnt buy the reasoning. u put tpein red for something NAI, put alco red for a fair point against retro, put me red for ??? reason, put ratchet town when i think his post is NAI, or even lean scummy, put xadlin town for doing nothing without knowing his range.
as for the reads themselves, ratchet and tpein r null for me, alco town, i am town, xadlin weak lean town
the one we majorly disagree on is alco, wanna talk more about it and his direction on watson?
ratchet is my main guess for indie. i agree hes being too reserved
i dont think this day is hard for him to contribute anything as scum because this day has been pretty much a freebie for mafia
need pressure. down to get claim too
what is your new gameplan?
why is it that you OMGUS all the time yet ekko susses you and you suddenly have no appetite for it due to your new gameplan?
why the sudden shift in wanting ekko lynched after being null on him the whole time.
youve posted so much shit yet have almost no scum reads and the way youve treated me slot is still nothing like youve done in the past(as in you typically accuse me of bad tunneling because im scum and cant resolve your slot properly). pretty sure i mentioned this already and you still didnt bother.
Your predicating this entirely around claiming my progression from suspecting you and Melkor of being aligned to my read on Ekko not firmly putting him as town OR scum and claiming that I'm not being logical. You have claimed in every game since our first one played together you can read me because I make weird jumps in logic or don't properly articulate the point I'm making when arguing and debating someone.
But in this ONE game you somehow seem to be struggling to understand me? I simply don't buy it. Either way I don't necessarily have to rein in an absolute read of town or scum reading someone day 1 simply because their day 1 content hasn't impressed me or put confidence in reading Ekko strongly one way or another. Also I would say my lack of reluctance to happily hammer Ekko should be indicative of where my thoughts are so stop dissembling around this point.
Well I'm going to have to revoke your license on reading me sadly today, Magic-san! I preempted your question and asked you a few ones back about why you were digging so hard with your heels defending Orca who by general consensus hasn't done anything proactive or real solving and retraced himself back to voting Poyser for ??? reasons. Saying my progression here is strange and that I was putting a smoking gun to your head because of the contrast between how your defending Orca vs barely making an inquiry about Craig seems odd when you've mentioned plenty of times in past games Craig would always be a primary play you want to try and figure out as soon as possible.
But from this your basically accusing me of having agenda by asking, thanks for confirming that.
Bunch of posts from D1I already said before it looks way too on the nose for my liking how you two went about voting them.
You kinda of were though? And what question did I avoid?
Your gaslighting me and misframing this entire exchange from earlier. I don't believe for one second you actually are justifying your rationalization that by asking you some questions in regards to Orca who your main threadplay was around and being questioned on in that point of the game that you think I was setting you up. There isn't any other way to signify your intent that my "question wasn't innocent".
@Poyser is this true? Also no, Magic. If you are an expert you know I'm town but I think your feeling the heat and trying to diffuse from both yourself and Ekko to push this much back at me and try to redirect the Retro/Watson wagon. But let me give you a liferope: what haven't I done here that I have in past games to easily read me as town?
Why are you strawmanning my reply to Craig? He didn't say that, I did. That's my belief lol.
You weren't moving on. You were digging in and trying to hold your ground with Ultra, Poyser, and myself around your play with Orca and the others on Orca's own play pushing a meaingless lynch on a then absent player. If you think this isn't innocent on my part to question you on it then I don't know what to tell you but tough tiddies.
I'm pretty sure I did elaborate on why I'm treating you as scummy and why I don't town read you. And as well I don't think you have an actual adequate basis for why you don't have a town read me on me currently so your stalling here imo.
I'd like Tweet to claim before me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?