Whicker
Preeminent
This is kind of Orca’s MO. He doesn’t actually believe in the “7th spot” or anything, but he wants to see how people respond to himThe point is that you're looking increasingly scummy when pressed on your reasons
This is kind of Orca’s MO. He doesn’t actually believe in the “7th spot” or anything, but he wants to see how people respond to himThe point is that you're looking increasingly scummy when pressed on your reasons
Oh so he's another T-Pein then. Good to knowThis is kind of Orca’s MO. He doesn’t actually believe in the “7th spot” or anything, but he wants to see how people respond to him
Of course. But in general I'd wager that across communities drawing unneeded and unwarranted attention to yourself is not going to be a general playstyle for scumPretty sure everyone has their own style when playing as scum. Can't really peg it down to one single method or tactic on this site at least.
That's the point, do you not want to look at the "lurkers" for a reason?How convenient, those people have like 10 posts between them
See above. Although to be fair both Polar and Orca are good at replicating their town games and I’m not 100% at reading them.Orca, fine? Really? The guy who voted for no reason, then revealed he had nothing except fake statistics, and doubled down on his statistics? Really?
very much noted
T-Pein on steroids, I'd say I'm more calculated but a bit wilder at times lolOh so he's another T-Pein then. Good to know
Should I care that they appear scummy to you? They are my reasons. You do with it as you likeThe point is that you're looking increasingly scummy when pressed on your reasons
They're very shaky reasons, and when forced to confront that you refuse to admit itShould I care that they appear scummy to you? They are my reasons. You do with it as you like
Lurkers are definitely worth testing later, but it's the first half of Day 1. They've not produced any content yet. We're not blind votingThat's the point, do you not want to look at the "lurkers" for a reason?
Why are you as well ignoring the non statistical reasons as wellOrca, fine? Really? The guy who voted for no reason, then revealed he had nothing except fake statistics, and doubled down on his statistics? Really?
very much noted
Isn't that what you are in fact doing lol.Lurkers are definitely worth testing later, but it's the first half of Day 1. They've not produced any content yet. We're not blind voting
....uh no? Just because we don't have info doesn't make the Psychic vote a blind vote, it's based on her activity in the thread. Blind voting would be jumping on someone like CP who hasn't posted onceIsn't that what you are in fact doing lol.
Unless you just had a slip there? You have more knowledge then you are letting on?
Oh man, now I wish I had done something different to start this game lmaoSee above. Although to be fair both Polar and Orca are good at replicating their town games and I’m not 100% at reading them.
They’re both experienced mafia players though nor are they idiots. I don’t think this is a scum ploy
Did I ever say either of the statistical reasons were guaranteed? Its just a part of the equation and that part is far from a guarantee. It is however (for our old board) a statistical probability that the 7th spot is most likely to be scum regardless of game size. Does that hold true here, who knows, I dont. It is and how I framed it, a strike in my eyesThey're very shaky reasons, and when forced to confront that you refuse to admit it
From what I can tell (since you didn't quote shit) they are based on posts during fluff phase and so have about the same amount of basis as you continuing to latch on to slot 7 theory (which is to say none at all)Why are you as well ignoring the non statistical reasons as well
But we are all blindly voting at its core. Everyone just rationalized things to make them feel correct....uh no? Just because we don't have info doesn't make the Psychic vote a blind vote, it's based on her activity in the thread. Blind voting would be jumping on someone like CP who hasn't posted once
You mean like popping on with your first post and goingOh man, now I wish I had done something different to start this game lmao
Did I ever say either of the statistical reasons were guaranteed? Its just a part of the equation and that part is far from a guarantee. It is however (for our old board) a statistical probability that the 7th spot is most likely to be scum regardless of game size. Does that hold true here, who knows, I dont. It is and how I framed it, a strike in my eyes
"How do I join the mafia chat"But we are all blindly voting at its core. Everyone just rationalized things to make them feel correct
You mean like popping on with your first post and going
"Does red mean im with the good guys"
I don't get what you're trying to ask here. Is the implication that since often Day 1 is a ML, we might as well not bother trying to get scum before D2?