Again, contradictory. You simultaneously argue he would both mail it in and try harder.Maybe, but again, his goal here isn't to do nothing. That's affordable if you're scum in a neutral game state, but he's trying to dig new roads. Basically I feel like this is premature more than completely ungrounded.
That was the Marvel game, dude.im refering to another game, one of her first ones. she and soul had posts in general mafia chat after the game and she threatened to quit site etc..
That said if Kurumi is town I suspect there is some TMI here.
Also I need to point out that T-Pein is duelling a player he thinks is town so he can win the duel
yeah arguing for sake of being open minded to possibilitiesSo arguing for the sake of arguing.
You wanted this extra lynch soooooo badly but we have 5 hours left and what have you done in regards to informing it? Nothing.
No you said you thought she was town long after she ragequit.Fake news.
Thought she didnt rq as town
Saw this last game I played with her here and I was thinking she was town
Someone told me she was scum tho.
*shrugs*
And besides.
I always said I was gonna lynch whatever yall wanted
*shrugs again*
Fake news.
Thought she didnt rq as town
Saw this last game I played with her here and I was thinking she was town
Someone told me she was scum tho.
*shrugs*
And besides.
I always said I was gonna lynch whatever yall wanted
*shrugs again*
No you said you thought she was town long after she ragequit.
Your contention that it's premature is pointless too because the wagon is the formation of pressure to better inform the read. You hard veto it before he even reacts to it for ??? reasons
Typical of you and your ilk. Essentially threaten to sabotage the game because you want your way, and then make everyone else pick up the pieces. To say nothing of the open collusion between you and T-Pein which clearly goes beyond the context of the game.yeah arguing for sake of being open minded to possibilities
unfortunately i wasnt able to play as much as i hoped, but i think a doddsy direction is not a bad one. i have read exactly up to post 180 + playing live for a bit. i understand my opinion does not mean much now but a second lynch helps everyone, i'll comb over thread at night if i find time
And the second part of that sentence?No the wagon is a wagon at this point
lol, this is weak ekkoyeah arguing for sake of being open minded to possibilities
unfortunately i wasnt able to play as much as i hoped, but i think a doddsy direction is not a bad one. i have read exactly up to post 180 + playing live for a bit. i understand my opinion does not mean much now but a second lynch helps everyone, i'll comb over thread at night if i find time
See I think Magic had a point about not using the duel today, because I'm really mainly interested in lynching Doddsy if Kurumi is scum. If she's not, I don't think I'm all too bloodthirsty on that front. Doddsy never commented on Kurumi at all, nor anything that was going on around her, so I see teammate potential there. If Kurumi is town however, I'd have to readjust because idk if Doddsy categorically jumps in front of his teammate Sky in that little disagreement we had.
I dont strongly town read him but why are you risk averse with Craig but not magic?Lowkey wanna take a swing at Magic here
and in a game where she got post silenced, as town
excuse me?Typical of you and your ilk. Essentially threaten to sabotage the game because you want your way, and then make everyone else pick up the pieces. To say nothing of the open collusion between you and T-Pein which clearly goes beyond the context of the game.
Nah it's shady because of the timing and wholly false premise that Lethal claimed I was nervous or scared. You then repeatedly tried to link me to Msgic and Sky for asking about her scum meta.Do I have synergy with Lethal because we both sus you? Well, this is just false; this is not what synergy means; no one was combo-womboing you. And the timing is different as well, our confrontation is more recent. Lethal is an afk early game player.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?