• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked You Will Eat The Bugs - A Mafia game brought to you by the World Economic Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
well, you can in day 2

also that's jumping into the assumption that i am scum. i may not be

im going to be solving in day 1, giving out town and scum reads. i might end up scum reading my entire team. surely u will be able to detect difference between my play around them from day 1 to day 2 yeah?

point is, im not really stopping anyone from getting a read. i am just playing day 1 as a spectator and it's my right to do so. if people do not like it they r welcomed to hammer this wagon any time
you are the most cowardly mafia player I've ever seen lmao. this is fucking pathetic, fr fr on god. nut up and read your damn role pm. I know you're terrified of being scum because you get blown up so easily every time lmao. fucking loser.
 
You being stubborn on your Bachi vote just isn't sitting well with him because he actually looks townie to me. You're hedging too much on your "tone" read and haven't substantiated much else concerning Bachi's slot.

And if you're not going to substantiate more, then I do expect you to pick out other directions like prod other players or give reads on other players here from what little we've seen.
It's literally all I've ever needed to read the guy, can't say I care much for your notion that I need to substantiate it further before it qualifies as whatever you need it to
 
oh good he's gone. guess I should've read all the way back before posting!

anyway, let's get that guap. Ultra low key GOAT mod for tossin the dork outta here.
 
well with that out of the way

vote mr reloaded

I don't know this guy but the easy town reads don't sit well! low key SUS or I guess high key since I placed a vote.
 
well with that out of the way

vote mr reloaded

I don't know this guy but the easy town reads don't sit well! low key SUS or I guess high key since I placed a vote.
You talking about my reads? I mean those are just early D1 vibes. It's not like much has really happened thread wise.
 
Feel free to substantiate on all of these. And google the meaning of "waffling" this time.
I guess sarcasm isn't very easily detected over the internet.
In fact, "pivoting for the fuck of it" given our low activity thread here would be a much better strategy anyway as it might incite activity and raise different perspectives. I wouldn't mind the effort from you, Tweet.
This is nonsensical. Why would you advise a player to just change their read simply to generate activity? That's more counterintuitive then anything.
 
This is nonsensical. Why would you advise a player to just change their read simply to generate activity? That's more counterintuitive then anything.
I didn't ask him to change any read lol. I asked him to either substantiate more on his Bachi read or prod else where too in order to generate activity.
 
If it's anything, Tweet's stubbornness here might be townie. It doesn't benefit his position as scum to have his only scum read come from a tone tell and discard other slots apart from a town read on Gad.

Melkor said that Tweet's scum meta isn't this bold and Gram town read him for his aggressiveness too - both of which is evidently displayed in his interactions with me thus far. I could perhaps just be wrong on his slot.

I wouldn't mind more input from others here tbh.
 
If it's anything, Tweet's stubbornness here might be townie. It doesn't benefit his position as scum to have his only scum read come from a tone tell and discard other slots apart from a town read on Gad.

Melkor said that Tweet's scum meta isn't this bold and Gram town read him for his aggressiveness too - both of which is evidently displayed in his interactions with me thus far. I could perhaps just be wrong on his slot.

I wouldn't mind more input from others here tbh.
It’s a flimsy read. It’s excusable I guess for eight pages in, but I don’t see why having a weak case on someone at a formative point makes them scum.
 
It’s a flimsy read. It’s excusable I guess for eight pages in, but I don’t see why having a weak case on someone at a formative point makes them scum.
You're right there. However, it wasn't the tone read alone. I found his other points towards Bachi either nitpicky, or thrown in later just to raise the value of his tone read. I outlined this in my earlier post. Then he defaulted back to tone read and refused to substantiate. It's a combination of these that formed my initial scum read on him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top