TAT tried to lynch the SK at the start of day who was our only chance of winning, so absolutely don’t trust the Gram wagon
Who are you voting?Guysssss
Pick one
No more no lynches
My preference would probably be OLU over Gram. Mechanically there is more against it too - Xenos had a failed kill there.
You take issue with it? Why?This framing is presented without context.
REMINDER: TAT tried to lynch the SK
Already said OLUWho are you voting?
The cycle before CP wanted me dead and I didn't see you purport this then. Which is to say, I have my reservations lol.You don't want to take my word for Gram wagon fine, just take CP's who with his final breath said to lynch him and gave detailed reasoning
Much better player than I and is confirmed town
Can you stick your vote on him? I’m a bit nervy about a no lynchAlready said OLU
Pretty sure you're not voting at all. Do I need to check?Already said OLU
You take issue with it? Why?
So you have no issue with what I'm actually saying, and you're moaning for the sake of it. Gotcha.I take issue with it because that's not very meaningful without it. As imposter observed that almost certainly ties OLU/TAT together. My expected response of you is "so?", but I just think that presenting that without context is very informative at all, in either case. If this is on the board I'd like to see the paper trail addressed, at the very least.
The thing about protective claims is that it's usually quite safe for scum to claim them outright and then it's kinda up to town to figure out how they're balanced.
The cycle before CP wanted me dead and I didn't see you purport this then. Which is to say, I have my reservations lol.
So you have no issue with what I'm actually saying, and you're moaning for the sake of it. Gotcha.