Eh, from what I can see, the STEAM you're talking about was a throwaway vote by me, a policy vote by CP and then 1 legit vote by Ratchet? If that's steam, then I wouldn't like to go to a sauna with you!vote ekko
whicker direction is good too but this one already has STEAM. Explained both positions already.
I've already gone over the futility of providing names - I don't need to go over it again. As for the second part, I agree it was off the cuff - what exactly is scummy about it?alternatively iratchet hasnt really provided the names of who could possibly be couching fang given fang replied to the vote on him within 3 minutes. its overall weak sauce hot take that is clearly not fully thought out, hence the ease at which it was retracted
@Alco you liked that post so I'd like you to answer this too.I've already gone over the futility of providing names - I don't need to go over it again. As for the second part, I agree it was off the cuff - what exactly is scummy about it?
just saw this when lethal brought itDear oh dear.
Ekko you clearly see something similar to what I did in Fang's posting - you read it differently but the idea was that his entrance was more aggressive than usual...
We apparently identified the same thing and went in opposite directions with it. Why are you not showing any consideration for this?
i would like it if u can find the time to read and give fresh thoughts. this game is going at a very manageable paceNo I'm skimming as well as getting distracted every 2 seconds lmao, I was hoping someone would talk to me
I don't think this is fair - I've discussed eith Gram too wherein I am trying to evaluate his slot, X as well albeit not much.just saw this when lethal brought it
i think his aggression was reactionary, u think otherwise. its not the same
i think u made some hot take that you expect will sail well, probably.. it didnt
i dont see any town ratchet's fire toward solving the game. you seem like u r in a bubble of your own just responding to accusations to you, your other outreach posts was the bad take on fang and the good guying between me and cp... none of these got any gears turning toward solving the game
why he shit talking u this much @T-Pein™ :sadzillaEkko has functioning brain cells though. The incel....the jury is out on that one.
I think you're town. I think Gramm's town, Lethal probably too. And Aurelian as well. No other strong town reads, though I haven't read all of the game.@Alco what r ur reads rn? town/scum. can be weak its fine
@MagicAm still there but haven't given him further thought from there.
I think you're town. I think Gramm's town, Lethal probably too. And Aurelian as well. No other strong town reads, though I haven't read all of the game.
unvote
Not sure I like what Magic's bringing. I think his reason for voting you was a bit flimsy.
my brother in Christ, let's just have fun together.Man I’m shit at this game now :hogansun
I do expect a response to this.@Alco you liked that post so I'd like you to answer this too.
talk to me more about the dalton read pls, i figure since hes going against magic and u scum read magic u probably have him townside which makes sense. is he not capable of that iso as scum? cuz hes done alot of those in elden ringVillage column leans: Fang, Ekko, Dalton, Gram
Wolf column lean: Magic
Vote: Magic
What's there to think about?I'll think about it!
its not townie so it automatically goes into the null/scum pile!I've already gone over the futility of providing names - I don't need to go over it again. As for the second part, I agree it was off the cuff - what exactly is scummy about it?
I don't really like to speak for others, but a common scum tactic is throwing out some lines here and there, see who bites, but then if there's no bite, make sure you can easily backtrack, which is what I suppose Ekko's getting at. He can answer for himself tho :)@Alco you liked that post so I'd like you to answer this too.
this guy doing the MU style post referencing with the hashtags smh