Game Ranked You Will Eat The Bugs - A Mafia game brought to you by the World Economic Forum

[Aurelian]

If you think I'm worrying about optics @Grammaton that isn't the case here if that IS what is on your mind

 

[Grammaton]

Because it's factually correct. Why are you interested in my callout on Melkor?

Why wouldn’t I be? I hope youre not going to cite me voting him here?

 

[Lindltaylor]

This is where you are trying to direct his focus. So while I don't care what particular inference you want to take here with me in relation to Tweet, you're trying almost from a bargaining position to get him to go elsewhere. If there is gonna be fallout for voting and behavior patterns from day 1 to day 2 then let it be and that bridge can be crossed when we get there.

@bolded - So let me get this straight, you went from telling me that I was telling tweet to "go sus someone else", to telling me now that I was trying to direct his focus, which is explore other options as well, which is basically what I was arguing for? That post you quoted is literally me telling him to explore other options / avenues.

@unbolded - I have no idea what you're saying here. It's such a vague statement.

 

[Lindltaylor]

I have no idea why there's so much confusion here for Fang over what I said there. @Aurelian what's your read of me and what's your read of tweet. Simple.

 

[Aurelian]

Why wouldn’t I be? I hope youre not going to cite me voting him here?

I'm predisposed to several reasons why you would be interested in my alignment on suspecting Melkor. But if you want the main one then I think your afraid I will pocket you like the last game if I am scum.

You are historically trending not reading me right in several games consecutively now, so that would also be another factor. I'm more or less your kryptonite.

Anyway I don't agree about your direction on Nibel. Not a hill I'm willing to die on.

 

[Aurelian]

I have no idea why there's so much confusion here for Fang over what I said there. @Aurelian what's your read of me and what's your read of tweet. Simple.

You say a lot of things but not much of substance and I despise the sheparding tactic with corraling PoE. I have you firmly as null, same as Tweet.

 

[Aurelian]

@Poyser ww@

 

[Bachi]

For real? Did you read anything about me? I voted before Gram.

How do you feel about Ratchet thus far?

 

[Bachi]

Could you contribute this day @RDK?

 

[Grammaton]

I'm predisposed to several reasons why you would be interested in my alignment on suspecting Melkor. But if you want the main one then I think your afraid I will pocket you like the last game if I am scum.

You are historically trending not reading me right in several games consecutively now, so that would also be another factor. I'm more or less your kryptonite.

Anyway I don't agree about your direction on Nibel. Not a hill I'm willing to die on.

I don’t have a direction on Nibel?

I can understand you posting this and being genuinely mistaken, but what do you make of rugrat liking it?

 

[Aurelian]

I don’t have a direction on Nibel?

I can understand you posting this and being genuinely mistaken, but what do you make of rugrat liking it?

You weren't shading Nibel earlier? Also not really sure what Rugrat is doing tbdean with the mass likes on my posts.

 

[Grammaton]

You weren't shading Nibel earlier? Also not really sure what Rugrat is doing tbdean with the mass likes on my posts.

I made one post about a post he’d made - not really a direction in any way - why did you bring this up? Especially as you apparently have no opinion either way?

 

[Ultra]

So we have a little bit over 7 hours on the clock, gonna make an executive decision to extend by 24 hours since we have old OLF levels of turnout so far. Will update countdown timer.

Vote count incoming

 

[Ultra]

Spoiler

​

Spoiler

^ This vote will not be counted. Please format correctly












​

Vote Count 1 Day 1

Magic: Lind
Emil: Lind
Lord Melkor: Emil > Bachi
Gad: Gram > Emil
Aurelian: Emil
Tweet: Bachi
Bachi: Lord Melkor

Emil: 2
Bachi: 2
Lind: 2
Lord Melkor: 1

With 18 players it takes 10 to lynch​

So you had to wait Tweet to come to go for Bachi, right? The-talking-like-a-robot was deciding in your choice to vote against him.

I really don't like how opportunistic you're playing.

Vote Lynch Melkor

Vote Melkor

Vote Ekko

Quite happy to get a claim from this

Vote ekko

I don’t even care what your alignment is tbh

r u still reading bachi the same way after his response to tweet?

Vote Melkor

Unvote

well with that out of the way

vote mr reloaded

I don't know this guy but the easy town reads don't sit well! low key SUS or I guess high key since I placed a vote.

Vote lynch Aurelian

Okay from skimming through, I don't actively think Melkor is scum. My impression from the thread is that he got some pressure early and has felt like he's kept digging, as scum he would try to back off (see Members, where he was under pressure early and then said "I am known for being scummier as town" to work backwards from where he was).

Bachi can have a lean town. Liked how he was prompting Melkor, as scum I think he tends to stay more on the sidelines over the main points of co tention, and it would be quite easy to do here.

Lind... eh I want to say town, but he's still missing something. @Lindltaylor typically you tend to look for townies and your reason is often the kinds of things that mostly get ignored or overlooked, like them being funny or something. Here, I feel like you've mostly been looking for scum reads. Can you explain/reconcile the difference there?

Don't like Nibel so far. Think he waited on Melkor to get voted by Gram first to then find a way to join in on the wagon, has offered little else but parroting really. In relation to that, Gram more likely to be town.

Vote: Nibel

Vote Count 2 Day 1

Magic: Lind
Emil: Lind
Lord Melkor: Emil > Bachi > Aurelian
Gad: Gram > Emil
Aurelian: Emil
Tweet: Bachi
Bachi: Lord Melkor
Nibel: Melkor
Gram: Melkor > Emil > Melkor
Rugrat: Emil > Unvote
Tempest: Reloaded
Ratchet: Nibel

Melkor: 3
Emil: 2
Lind: 2
Reloaded: 1
Bachi: 1
Aurelian: 1
Nibel: 1

With 18 players it takes 10 to lynch. You have 31 hours remaining​

 

[Aurelian]

I made one post about a post he’d made - not really a direction in any way - why did you bring this up? Especially as you apparently have no opinion either way?

I didn't say I had no opinion though---I said it wasn't something I was invested in fighting over it.

 

[Grammaton]

I didn't say I had no opinion though---I said it wasn't something I was invested in fighting over it.

Exactly, your opinion was that you have no opinion

Which makes me wanna know why you mentioned it?

 

[Gaddamnit]

1. Nibel - Town
2. Magic - Null
3. Lord Melkor - Scum
4. Gram - Null
5. Tweet - Scum
6. Tempest - Null
8. Gad - Town
9. Aurelian - Null
12. Mr. Reloaded - Town
13. Fuji - Town
16. Bachi - Town
18. Rugrat - Null

You never told me why you town read me btw.

No one really stood out to me to be completely honest I could hop on the @Melkor wagon but I'd rather give him an opportunity to clear his name before I just vote with the crowd

No one? At least give us general thoughts then.

• Tweet has had posts concerning mainly Bachi and has been otherwise just responding to other posts concerning him. I haven't seen him pivot any other avenues.
• Melkor has tried to approach different avenues and tries to form more town reads. His scum read is weaker than tweet, but still exists simply because his reasoning to follow the Bachi vote is bad imo.

I like this post. I actually townread Melkor for that reason. It feels like he's prodding

Are you a dirty scum?

What do you mean by "waffling? I am not even sure i know this word.

Damn bruh, you waffling...

I like so far Magic, Fuji, Reloaded, Tweet, you propably still but less after your push on Tweet and me. I know I sound naturallly scummy though.

Why? And did your read on Lindl change?

 

[Gaddamnit]

Gonna say I agree that Fang does not look good in his interaction with Lind

Gonna push there until RDK gives us more

Vote Lynch Fang

 

[Aurelian]

Exactly, your opinion was that you have no opinion

Which makes me wanna know why you mentioned it?

No, my opinion was I didn't agree but I wasn't gonna bother to draw it out.

 

[Aurelian]

Gonna say I agree that Fang does not look good in his interaction with Lind

Gonna push there until RDK gives us more

Vote Lynch Fang

How do I look 'not good' when Lind was doing nothing but trying to steer Tweet's focus off Bachi? Why would that be a bad 'look' for me exactly?