Regular-Nothing Eric
Distinguished
Geez, is almost everything even just decently high becoming fucking 1-A nowadays?Do we use VSB definitions here?
To answer you question, anything with a Type-4 Multiverse is 1-A by default.
Geez, is almost everything even just decently high becoming fucking 1-A nowadays?Do we use VSB definitions here?
To answer you question, anything with a Type-4 Multiverse is 1-A by default.
Pretty much, yeah...Geez, is almost everything even just decently high becoming fucking 1-A nowadays?
Well damn, fuck me...Pretty much, yeah...
![]()
Someone claimed they are omnipotent?end result of blanket statement scaling
a statement that can be backed up as existing beyond spacetime now counts as Low 1A on their standard
That's just not a sustainable way to do this hobby, it's not just too much power creep it's the fact that you're now opening the floodgates to all kinds of other open ended statements that by necessity have to be considered for this standard to be fair
You joke but this is unironically what their Tier 0 now basically boils down toSomeone claimed they are omnipotent?
Guess we gotta mark that down as a feat cause they said it
![]()
just throw the whole site in the trash at this rateYou joke but this is unironically what their Tier 0 now basically boils down to
It's not that simple, they debated it for a long time and it got fairly complicated, but the end result was more or less a much more sophisticated version of 2009 era battleboard omnipotence arguments. Not a fan of that
You joke but this is unironically what their Tier 0 now basically boils down to
It's not that simple, they debated it for a long time and it got fairly complicated, but the end result was more or less a much more sophisticated version of 2009 era battleboard omnipotence arguments. Not a fan of that
The thing I find really interesting about VSB is the guy spearheading most of their revisions is actually a really smart kid, eg this thread which initially sounds stupid off the titlejust throw the whole site in the trash at this rate
All quantitative differences are also continuous with each other, meaning you can add up a lot of small things to get a big thing. Put together a lot of 3 m³ cubes and you'll eventually cover a volume of 10 km³. Put together an aleph-2 amount of universes, and you'll have a High 1-B+ collection, even if the individual universes making up that collection are Low 2-C or somesuch. Same applies to higher-dimensional things; even if a physical square isn't a bunch of line segments "glued" together, it still has 1-dimensional sub-regions, and mathematically it is still a line segment multiplied by itself (Which is an uncountably infinite add-up).
Too late. VBW and it’s imitators have permeated this entire hobby.
VBW could literally die right now and change nothing
imma be real with you chief, this shit reads like hot ass, I understand what hes getting at but actually trying to use this in vs debates is just going to turn people off the hobby hardcoreThe thing I find really interesting about VSB is the guy spearheading most of their revisions is actually a really smart kid, eg this thread which initially sounds stupid off the title
![]()
Can 3-D characters have 1-A physicals?
So, as we all know, the Tiering System is divided into two directions of power: Quantitative and qualitative. When we say the difference between X and Y is "quantitative," we mean exactly what's on the tin: It has to do with quantity. Some numerical determination keeping them apart. So the...vsbattles.com
But then reading some of his examples he's already well aware of many of the issues a holistic tiering system runs into
eg
(This is one of the things I brought up in my tier thread as well as something we would need to account for trying to weigh one series against the other, and it's a way to account for series with different cosmologies)
It's just kinda funny to me that for all their issues VSB is at least aware of some of these and actively trying to workshop fixes.
Like I shouldn't need to delve into quantum physics and shit just to win a vs debate. Its the most turnoffish shit ive ever had the displeasure of seeing/reading/debating
its so fucking bad
Not as rare as you or I would hope, sadly.we are witnessing levels of sophistry rarely seen
I mean thats why nobody likes using multiversal characters, but this shit is unfortunately necessary if you’re gonna compare one to another at all![]()
imma be real with you chief, this shit reads like hot ass, I understand what hes getting at but actually trying to use this in vs debates is just going to turn people off the hobby hardcore
That's Ascension, actually. And its from a Goddess that was never a Primordial deity in the myths no matter who you read, who for some reason was made it for the GOW-verse, that represents the oceans/seas(which should be taken up by Oceanus and Pontus/Thalassa respectively) punching Ouranos, Kronos's father in the face.Kratos, Im a massive fan of all god of war games and getting anything close to universal requires very, very selective reading of the material. Specifically Im pretty sure most of it comes down to an explanation in god of war 1 where kronos/another titan got punched and created the stars in the sky and kratos getting scaled to that.