Imposter
Illustrious
I can somewhat see ruling certain people out even if that's a bit dicey too but trying to figure out who would target any given player (besides maybe with a kill) seems a bit of a crapshoot
- It's that time of the year again! Just kidding, we were late.
Click here to see the awards and nominate people for the rest of the categories.
- We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!
- Status
Eh, there can be all sorts of WIFOM about why mafia would kill a certain someone. You wouldn't tend to see them roletrack somebody they weren't either wary of or planning to push tho
The reservation I have with Tweet here is - why as scum does he claim stump? I understand that this is approaching WIFOM, but with Xenos on the table I feel like basically anything but "lynching me is fine" would be strong enough a claim to at least dissuade some people from wanting his flip, but he chose the one claim that actually invites it. I don't believe this has been given due consideration - it was just tabled and then dismissed.
Lethal
T.B.A
Weak defence tbh
Lethal
T.B.A
Scum stumps have been seen on WS/WF games before. Although Tweet's go to claim is VT generally
Hans Tweetenberg
Marvelous
Hoo boy Poyser quoted 10 more posts of mine
Do I even bother with this or do I just take the lynch that's coming anyway and continue tomorrow
Do I even bother with this or do I just take the lynch that's coming anyway and continue tomorrow
@Alco it was this stuff with Imposter. These were all in the first handful of pages in the game and I really liked it as an entrance because he got straight stuck into trying to play the game and prodding with questions and votes, and I thought he handled TATs sus on him really well lol. Could be that they're a really good player and Im not giving them enough respect but I vibed them town pretty strongly actually
Hans Tweetenberg
Marvelous
Yeah no not gonna bother, I don't think anything is wrong with me and just think Poyser and Ultra choose to view everything I say as unflattering as they possibly can
There could be a number of reasons tho, like it could be a given fake from the host, a tailored fake claim or just a list of roles he's given that are safe to fake. It could also be his real role. Also the added benefits of never having to provide any kind of results or protection lol, excuses never being shot by scum etc
Hans Tweetenberg
Marvelous
Prob just gonna tunnel them all game tbhtbh
Lol you already decided not to reply to my longer posts earlier so Im gonna assume you're gonna "yeah i cba" it
Ye he was
shocker lol
Tweet I've got 3 votes on me including your own, there is clearly a level of interest there from others to lynch me and yet you're not at all interested in going back and forth with me or pushing it further. I even invited you to go deeper into your scum read of me earlier and now you're refusing to engage. Its almost like you don't believe in it at all
Rugrat
Caldust
Can you give a v quick read list plz
its actually pretty par for the course with tweet in particular lol
I've seen scum treestumps before - that isn't the point I'm making. Whatever Tweet *actually* is is besides the point, I'm asking why, as Scum in this hypothetical, does Tweet elect to claim the one role that gives compelling reason to lynch him over Xenos, who from Scum's perspective, is a very easy pivot because he is an outed anti town killer. There are actually few worse claims for Tweet to have possibly made here as scum.
Yeah I mean there are reasons sure, but it strikes me as very suboptimal given the current game state to roll with it. Even just vanilla is more compelling.
- Status