Ratchet started crying about how I was unfair to him the entire game (I wasn't), then I tried to sit down and have him explain to me how I offended him, he said it was a waste of time explaining.
Malice? Fucking really?
Malice? Fucking really?
Well that doesn't help me solve the game, does it? I'm talking about my perspective on it, if I end up getting lynched I'd want to have something to leave as a form of legacy.If RDK is town I would be surprised you don't get cooked yourself tomorrow
I can see her coming to the conclusions she said off of her Ekko ISO. You say it was created for the evidence to fit the narrative - possible, but I can see the angle for her to be genuine. I liked her posts. Obviously if I'm wrong on RDK I like it less.Her evidence made no sense at all
And by crying you mean, I explained I felt you have do r a poor job at behavioural analysis and that you've not really been charitable at all.Ratchet started crying about how I was unfair to him the entire game (I wasn't), then I tried to sit down and have him explain to me how I offended him, he said it was a waste of time explaining.
Malice? Fucking really?
I suppose I agree that scum would feel more of an onus to explain reads. But Psychic has gotten to D3 without having to do anything so, I could see her just playing into that.Bit of a level 1 read that tbh Ratchet
Ratchet started crying about how I was unfair to him the entire game (I wasn't), then I tried to sit down and have him explain to me how I offended him, he said it was a waste of time explaining.
Malice? Fucking really?
And by crying you mean, I explained I felt you have do r a poor job at behavioural analysis and that you've not really been charitable at all.
I explained them, you said you considered it by not demonstrating any consideration and ignoring it for a cycle, and then back to where you were. Uncharitable.Yes, and then I prompted you to bring up examples, and you dropped the subject, because I was genuinely interested
I explained them, you said you considered it by not demonstrating any consideration and ignoring it for a cycle, and then back to where you were. Uncharitable.
What are you using to scum read me, if not behaviour? For the record- it's not contradictory, I'm saying you ignore behaviour that doesn't suit your scum read, and focus on behaviour that does. Difficult concept, I know!So, no. First off, your position (that I actually cum read you for), was that I was "using your behavior to scum read you" (Complete bullshit). When you couldn't qualify that, you took the position me ignoring your behavior was actually a condemnation. Contradictory positions.
I think my position is clear. I would support it, but would prefer RDK.Gonna have to push for an answer ladies and gents