‘You dismissed rugrat’
Dear lord
Dear lord
A bad metric to measure me by tbdeani concur. he's leading post count. doubtful he's scum here.
Oh now back to Nibel
‘You dismissed rugrat’
Dear lord
My points are you aren't taking a strong position on anything for a push or wagon for lynching
Why not vote me since you just said I'm "sliding down" in your eyes?That’s what the letters say, yes!
Why not vote me since you just said I'm "sliding down" in your eyes?
My last vote was on Haza I thinkBecause .. you can only vote .. one person … at a time
Are you even voting anybody atm lmao
While I am interested in seeing you cook, Gram has reminded me of how much of a menace to himself Gad can be when forced to defend himself, sooooo nahyou should vote gad.
My last vote was on Haza I think
I didn't like his postUm, why?
I will since I'm still failing to understand why Gad voted meyou should vote gad.
Yeah, bed
The people from the first half ain't showing up in the second half.We playing with our pricks again okay
Frozen in scum chat possibly?
Okay, this is inaccurate:What exactly is inaccurate? He reads you as scum for not playing a certain way yet he concedes Melkor IS playing that way and yet reads him scum any way.
I said that it would be better for Tweet to prod other avenues for me to get a better read of his slot if he isn't going to substantiate his read on Bachi:You're right there. However, it wasn't the tone read alone. I found his other points towards Bachi either nitpicky, or thrown in later just to raise the value of his tone read. I outlined this in my earlier post. Then he defaulted back to tone read and refused to substantiate. It's a combination of these that formed my initial scum read on him.
You being stubborn on your Bachi vote just isn't sitting well with him because he actually looks townie to me. You're hedging too much on your "tone" read and haven't substantiated much else concerning Bachi's slot.
And if you're not going to substantiate more, then I do expect you to pick out other directions like prod other players or give reads on other players here from what little we've seen.
Given the low activity thread state, any avenues of approach helps generate activity and and would be better for me to get more reads not only on Tweet, but other respondents as well.In fact, "pivoting for the fuck of it" given our low activity thread here would be a much better strategy anyway as it might incite activity and raise different perspectives. I wouldn't mind the effort from you, Tweet.
The original point is a standard I am proposing to not only better read him, but might be better for the thread. Tunneling or commenting on only a single slot, however, won't help me here and thus my proposal to tweet stands. And AFTER THAT, the way a player approaches a slot is taken into account as well. This latter point is what I used against Melkor here:I’m not saying there aren’t other factors in him reading Melkor scum, but if the original point isn’t strong enough to get him to town read someone then why is that the main point he’s using against you? It doesn’t make sense.
I'm suggesting that Tweet could approach different slots to help me understand his approach because his approach to Bachi was mainly on tone and tone is subjective - interpreted differently by different players. Therefore, more substantiation on Bachi's slot could have been made to convince me, or prodding elsewhere. Prodding elsewhere would help me see his approach to different players and judge those approaches - a metric I used on Melkor as quoted above.
- Tweet has had posts concerning mainly Bachi and has been otherwise just responding to other posts concerning him. I haven't seen him pivot any other avenues.
- Melkor has tried to approach different avenues and tries to form more town reads. His scum read is weaker than tweet, but still exists simply because his reasoning to follow the Bachi vote is bad imo.
No. Read above ^. The approaches to both the slots are nuanced in steps and different. According to you, then, I wouldn't be giving Tweet more consideration and re-think my read on his slot if what you said was my main pet peeve with him, but I'm doing the exact opposite here:Look at the way lind read both tweet and Melkor, I’ve mentioned it a few times already. He basically read tweet as scum for not prodding more people, then admitted Melkor did this but scum read him anyway so not really sure why he’s so confident on tweet considering the only thing he had on him was something he dismissed for someone else?
If I read Tweet as scum for not prodding more people, then I wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt for being stubborn on a single read. What happened is exactly the opposite of what you said.If it's anything, Tweet's stubbornness here might be townie. It doesn't benefit his position as scum to have his only scum read come from a tone tell and discard other slots apart from a town read on Gad.
Melkor said that Tweet's scum meta isn't this bold and Gram town read him for his aggressiveness too - both of which is evidently displayed in his interactions with me thus far. I could perhaps just be wrong on his slot.
I wouldn't mind more input from others here tbh.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?