• We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!

Game Ranked You Will Eat The Bugs - A Mafia game brought to you by the World Economic Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reader mode
Lindltaylor said:
Uh, no my dude lol. If you think Gad, LM, Bachi and I are willingly putting ourselves in the fire like this, then you're wrong. A personal experience and a sample size of 1 in your favor, even if recency bias is weighing in, is just bad outlook.
Click to expand...

Yes, it seems like a very simplistic chain of thought from him.
 
Grammaton said:
I seem extremely popular all of a sudden!

In all seriousness I haven’t really had the time or energy to play properly so understandable

I can’t really decide what I think on Melkor right now - initially I thought Nibel was acting in bad faith, but then I hated Melkors reply to Bachi about why he was reading him as he was

Poyser looked give or take how I’d expect town poyser to look, I also don’t feel he’s pushing a pre planned agenda given

Rugrat appears to just be trolling, wouldn’t really care if he’s lynched. Seems to be prioritising liking some of fangs more nonsensical posts over anything else. Also think the post about expecting magic and I to ‘joust’ is just plain wrong - if anything the last game would show how bad that can potentially be.

Still like tweet, probably the read I’m happiest with

Think the Bachi/Nibel/Lind axis is where I’d start, tier 4 maths but I feel there’s a high chance of scum in there, would probably say Nibel goes 1st

Finally a dishonourable mention for ratchet who gave me a town read I don’t really understand on reflection - that said he also voted Nibel straight up which aligns with my current worldview

If I haven’t covered it here, I probably don’t have an opinion on it
Click to expand...
This is a bit tepid. You think Tweet is town, indifferent on Melkor and myself. Seems a lot of “on one hand, but on the other hand” which philosophically speaking is fine for a balanced debate, but poor for a suggesting directions at formative points.

If you are town and working on a 13/4/1 split you have a 68% chance of suggesting there’s a scum in any three randomly listed players. i find it particularly threadbare you’ve cherry picked three of the “easier” lynches. I find it terrible spec at best, and incredibly opportunistic if we’re looking at it cynically.
 
Rugrat said:
This is a bit tepid. You think Tweet is town, indifferent on Melkor and myself. Seems a lot of “on one hand, but on the other hand” which philosophically speaking is fine for a balanced debate, but poor for a suggesting directions at formative points.

If you are town and working on a 13/4/1 split you have a 68% chance of suggesting there’s a scum in any three randomly listed players. i find it particularly threadbare you’ve cherry picked three of the “easier” lynches. I find it terrible spec at best, and incredibly opportunistic if we’re looking at it cynically.
Click to expand...

Cool story bro
 
Grammaton said:
What did you want me to say exactly? You vomited your opinion all over me with no invitation for further discussion - as I know what you’re saying is fundamentally incorrect, nothing more for me to do is there?
Click to expand...
so people need to be invited for further discussion now lol

Nothing I said was “fundamentally incorrect” which is why you’ve not pointed it out
 
Ok let’s go through the key points

  • You think Tweet is town
  • You’re indifferent on myself and Melkor
  • You have reconciled some of your reads with doubts
  • the statistical probability point

What of that is incorrect
 
Reader mode
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top